These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28228932)

  • 1. A clinically relevant in vivo model for the assessment of scaffold efficacy in abdominal wall reconstruction.
    Chan JC; Burugapalli K; Huang YS; Kelly JL; Pandit A
    J Tissue Eng; 2017; 8():2041731416686532. PubMed ID: 28228932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cross-Linked Cholecyst-Derived Extracellular Matrix for Abdominal Wall Repair.
    Chan JCY; Burugapalli K; Huang YS; Kelly JL; Pandit A
    Tissue Eng Part A; 2018 Aug; 24(15-16):1190-1206. PubMed ID: 29448888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The repair of abdominal defects in rabbits with Parietex and Surgisis meshes abdominal wall].
    Baroncello JB; Czeczko NG; Malafaia O; Ribas-Filho JM; Nassif PA; Dietz AU
    Arq Gastroenterol; 2008; 45(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 19148362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. One-year outcome of biological and synthetic bioabsorbable meshes for augmentation of large abdominal wall defects in a rabbit model.
    Peeters E; van Barneveld KW; Schreinemacher MH; De Hertogh G; Ozog Y; Bouvy N; Miserez M
    J Surg Res; 2013 Apr; 180(2):274-83. PubMed ID: 23481559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical and histological evaluation of abdominal wall compliance with intraperitoneal onlay mesh implants in rabbits: a comparison of six different state-of-the-art meshes.
    Konerding MA; Chantereau P; Delventhal V; Holste JL; Ackermann M
    Med Eng Phys; 2012 Sep; 34(7):806-16. PubMed ID: 21992970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characteristics of different mesh types for abdominal wall repair in an experimental model of peritonitis.
    Kaufmann R; Jairam AP; Mulder IM; Wu Z; Verhelst J; Vennix S; Giesen LJX; Clahsen-van Groningen MC; Jeekel J; Lange JF
    Br J Surg; 2017 Dec; 104(13):1884-1893. PubMed ID: 28901533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mechanical behavior of surgical meshes for abdominal wall repair: In vivo versus biaxial characterization.
    Simón-Allué R; Ortillés A; Calvo B
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Jun; 82():102-111. PubMed ID: 29579555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mechanical behaviour of synthetic surgical meshes: finite element simulation of the herniated abdominal wall.
    Hernández-Gascón B; Peña E; Melero H; Pascual G; Doblaré M; Ginebra MP; Bellón JM; Calvo B
    Acta Biomater; 2011 Nov; 7(11):3905-13. PubMed ID: 21763794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long term behavior of biological prostheses used as abdominal wall substitutes.
    Pascual G; Sotomayor S; Pérez-López P; Buján J; Bellón JM
    Histol Histopathol; 2014 Jan; 29(1):139-49. PubMed ID: 23868096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Combined in vivo and ex vivo analysis of mesh mechanics in a porcine hernia model.
    Kahan LG; Lake SP; McAllister JM; Tan WH; Yu J; Thompson D; Brunt LM; Blatnik JA
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Feb; 32(2):820-830. PubMed ID: 28733734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term anisotropic mechanical response of surgical meshes used to repair abdominal wall defects.
    Hernández-Gascón B; Peña E; Pascual G; Rodríguez M; Bellón JM; Calvo B
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2012 Jan; 5(1):257-71. PubMed ID: 22100101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experimental reconstruction of an abdominal wall defect with electrospun polycaprolactone-ureidopyrimidinone mesh conserves compliance yet may have insufficient strength.
    Hympanova L; Mori da Cunha MGMC; Rynkevic R; Wach RA; Olejnik AK; Dankers PYW; Arts B; Mes T; Bosman AW; Albersen M; Deprest J
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Dec; 88():431-441. PubMed ID: 30216933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Functional and morphological evaluation of different polypropylene-mesh modifications for abdominal wall repair.
    Klosterhalfen B; Klinge U; Schumpelick V
    Biomaterials; 1998 Dec; 19(24):2235-46. PubMed ID: 9884036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Large pore size and controlled mesh elongation are relevant predictors for mesh integration quality and low shrinkage--Systematic analysis of key parameters of meshes in a novel minipig hernia model.
    Weyhe D; Cobb W; Lecuivre J; Alves A; Ladet S; Lomanto D; Bayon Y
    Int J Surg; 2015 Oct; 22():46-53. PubMed ID: 26277532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is biocompatibility affected by constant shear stress?--comparison of three commercially available meshes in a rabbit model.
    Böhm G; Steinau G; Krähling E; Schumpelick V; Hermanns-Sachweh B; Stanzel S; Ottinger A
    J Biomater Appl; 2011 Mar; 25(7):721-41. PubMed ID: 20219847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical and morphological study of a new elastic mesh (Ciberlastic) to repair abdominal wall defects.
    Calvo B; Pascual G; Peña E; Pérez-Khöler B; Rodríguez M; Bellón JM
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Jun; 59():366-378. PubMed ID: 26905037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Resorbable Synthetic Meshes for Abdominal Wall Defects in Preclinical Setting: A Literature Review.
    Miserez M; Jairam AP; Boersema GSA; Bayon Y; Jeekel J; Lange JF
    J Surg Res; 2019 May; 237():67-75. PubMed ID: 30710881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What is the evidence for the use of biologic or biosynthetic meshes in abdominal wall reconstruction?
    Köckerling F; Alam NN; Antoniou SA; Daniels IR; Famiglietti F; Fortelny RH; Heiss MM; Kallinowski F; Kyle-Leinhase I; Mayer F; Miserez M; Montgomery A; Morales-Conde S; Muysoms F; Narang SK; Petter-Puchner A; Reinpold W; Scheuerlein H; Smietanski M; Stechemesser B; Strey C; Woeste G; Smart NJ
    Hernia; 2018 Apr; 22(2):249-269. PubMed ID: 29388080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Infection susceptibility of crosslinked and non-crosslinked biological meshes in an experimental contaminated environment.
    Mulder IM; Deerenberg EB; Bemelman WA; Jeekel J; Lange JF
    Am J Surg; 2015 Jul; 210(1):159-66. PubMed ID: 25277544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Abdominal wall reinforcement: biologic vs. degradable synthetic devices.
    Gruber-Blum S; Brand J; Keibl C; Fortelny RH; Redl H; Mayer F; Petter-Puchner AH
    Hernia; 2017 Apr; 21(2):305-315. PubMed ID: 28012032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.