These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Finishing and polishing of indirect composite and ceramic inlays in-vivo: occlusal surfaces. Jung M; Wehlen O; Klimek J Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):131-41. PubMed ID: 15088723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Micrographic and profilometric evaluation of the finish produced by diamond and tungsten carbide finishing burs on enamel and dentin. Price RB; Sutow EJ J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Sep; 60(3):311-6. PubMed ID: 2845071 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Surface roughness of glass-ceramic insert-composite restorations: assessing several polishing techniques. Ashe MJ; Tripp GA; Eichmiller FC; George LA; Meiers JC J Am Dent Assoc; 1996 Oct; 127(10):1495-500. PubMed ID: 8908919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. New finishing instruments for composite resins. Lutz F; Setcos JC; Phillips RW J Am Dent Assoc; 1983 Oct; 107(4):575-80. PubMed ID: 6579090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surface roughness and cutting efficiency of composite finishing instruments. Jung M Oper Dent; 1997; 22(3):98-104. PubMed ID: 9484147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effectiveness of reciprocal-action instrumentation for polishing composite resin: an in vitro study. Small KL; Goldfogel MH; Newman SM J Esthet Dent; 1992; 4(6):208-15. PubMed ID: 1338572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of finishing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials. Lopes GC; Franke M; Maia HP J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 12239477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of dental rotary instruments on the roughness and wettability of human dentin surfaces. Ayad MF; Johnston WM; Rosenstiel SF J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Aug; 102(2):81-8. PubMed ID: 19643221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of tooth preparation burs and luting cement types on the marginal fit of extracoronal restorations. Ayad MF J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 19054303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of cement selection and finishing technique on marginal opening of cast gold inlays. Farrell CV; Johnson GH; Oswald MT; Tucker RD J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):287-92. PubMed ID: 18395539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of repeated hand instrumentation on the marginal portion of a cast gold crown. Yagi H; Ito K; Eda M; Murai S J Periodontol; 1998 Jan; 69(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 9527560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Effect of rotary instruments on composites for coronal restoration. A proposed evaluation protocol for the effect of rotary instruments and surface conditions]. Ache M; Goldberg M; Lefort A; Renaux P Cah Prothese; 1991 Jun; (74):56-68. PubMed ID: 1650285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Removal of overhanging amalgam: a comparative study of three instruments. Givens EG; Gwinnett AJ; Boucher LJ J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Dec; 52(6):815-20. PubMed ID: 6392513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of different grit sizes of diamond rotary instruments for tooth preparation on the retention and adaptation of complete coverage restorations. Li YQ; Wang H; Wang YJ; Chen JH J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):86-93. PubMed ID: 22304742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]