220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28229232)
1. Comparison of cure rates in women treated with cold-coagulation versus LLETZ cervical treatment for CIN2-3 on pretreatment cervical punch biopsies: a retrospective cohort study.
Papoutsis D; Underwood M; Parry-Smith W; Panikkar J
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Apr; 295(4):979-986. PubMed ID: 28229232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Early and late pregnancy outcomes in women treated with cold-coagulation versus LLETZ cervical treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; a retrospective cohort study.
Papoutsis D; Underwood M; Parry-Smith W; Panikkar J
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Apr; 297(4):1015-1025. PubMed ID: 29404740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk factors for treatment failure following cold coagulation cervical treatment for CIN pathology: a cohort-based study.
Papoutsis D; Underwood M; Parry-Smith W; Panikkar J
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Dec; 292(6):1329-37. PubMed ID: 26006259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women with transformation zone type 3: cervical biopsy versus large loop excision.
Gustafson LW; Hammer A; Bennetsen MH; Kristensen CB; Majeed H; Petersen LK; Andersen B; Bor P
BJOG; 2022 Dec; 129(13):2132-2140. PubMed ID: 35488417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effectiveness of cold coagulation in treating high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: the human papillomavirus evidence of cure.
Tadesse WG; Oni AAA; Hickey KPW
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Oct; 39(7):965-968. PubMed ID: 31094247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does colposcopically directed punch biopsy reduce the incidence of negative LLETZ?
Denny LA; Soeters R; Dehaeck K; Bloch B
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 Jul; 102(7):545-8. PubMed ID: 7647056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The use of cold coagulation for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Wyse A; Seah WA; O'Neill J; Byrne P
Ir Med J; 2017 May; 110(5):565. PubMed ID: 28737306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biopsy and selective recall compared with immediate large loop excision in management of women with low grade abnormal cervical cytology referred for colposcopy: multicentre randomised controlled trial.
TOMBOLA Group
BMJ; 2009 Jul; 339():b2548. PubMed ID: 19638647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Small lesion size measured by colposcopy may predict absence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a large loop excision of the transformation zone specimen.
Munmany M; Marimon L; Cardona M; Nonell R; Juiz M; Astudillo R; Ordi J; Torné A; Del Pino M
BJOG; 2017 Feb; 124(3):495-502. PubMed ID: 27506510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy of large loop excision of the transformation zone for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Chia KV; Fayle RJ; Sobowale OA
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1993 Aug; 33(3):287-9. PubMed ID: 8304896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Low recurrence rate of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after successful excision and routine colposcopy during follow-up.
Lili E; Chatzistamatiou K; Kalpaktsidou-Vakiani A; Moysiadis T; Agorastos T
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jan; 97(4):e9719. PubMed ID: 29369205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does CIN2 Have the Same Aggressive Potential As CIN3? A Secondary Analysis of High-Grade Cytology Recurrence in Women Treated with Cold-Coagulation Cervical Treatment.
Papoutsis D; Underwood M; Parry-Smith W; Panikkar J
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 2017 Mar; 77(3):284-289. PubMed ID: 28392582
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Association between grade of referral smear and high-grade disease among women with biopsy samples showing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2.
Hakem E; Ibrahim E; Tanyous E; Astbury K; Purandare N
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2018 Feb; 140(2):223-227. PubMed ID: 29049873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Overtreatment rate after immediate local excision of suspected cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: A prospective cohort study.
Kiviharju M; Heinonen A; Jakobsson M; Virtanen S; Auvinen E; Kotaniemi-Talonen L; Dillner J; Kyrgiou M; Nieminen P; Aro K; Kalliala I
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Nov; 167(2):167-173. PubMed ID: 36153296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of primary human papillomavirus cervical screening in England: extended follow-up of the ARTISTIC randomised trial cohort through three screening rounds.
C Kitchener H; Canfell K; Gilham C; Sargent A; Roberts C; Desai M; Peto J
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Apr; 18(23):1-196. PubMed ID: 24762804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cytologic follow-up in patients with CIN treated by LLETZ, Cold knife Conization and Semm's cold coagulation.
Grubisić G; Vukosavić-Cimić B; Kraljević Z; Pirkić A; Grbavac I; Bolanca I
Coll Antropol; 2010 Mar; 34(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 20432727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The volume perspective: a comparison of two excisional treatments for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (laser versus LLETZ).
Phadnis SV; Atilade A; Young MP; Evans H; Walker PG
BJOG; 2010 Apr; 117(5):615-9. PubMed ID: 20156211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Endocervical Crypt Involvement by CIN2-3 as a Predictor of Cytology Recurrence After Excisional Cervical Treatment.
Papoutsis D; Panikkar J; Underwood M; Blundell S; Sahu B; Blackmore J; Reed N
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2015 Oct; 19(4):311-8. PubMed ID: 26247257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The borderline cervical smear: colposcopic and biopsy outcome.
al-Nafussi A; Rebello G; al-Yusif R; McGoogan E
J Clin Pathol; 2000 Jun; 53(6):439-44. PubMed ID: 10911801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does LLETZ excision margin status predict residual disease in women who have undergone post-treatment cervical cytology and high-risk human papillomavirus testing?
Palmer JE; Ravenscroft S; Ellis K; Crossley J; Dudding N; Smith JH; Tidy JA
Cytopathology; 2016 Jun; 27(3):210-7. PubMed ID: 26415635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
