These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Use the patent system to regulate gene editing. Parthasarathy S Nature; 2018 Oct; 562(7728):486-488. PubMed ID: 30353159 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. CRISPR plants now subject to tough GM laws in European Union. Callaway E Nature; 2018 Aug; 560(7716):16. PubMed ID: 30065322 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. CRISPR conundrum: Strict European court ruling leaves food-testing labs without a plan. Ledford H Nature; 2019 Aug; 572(7767):15. PubMed ID: 31363192 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Separate product from process: framing the debate that surrounds the potential uptake of new breeding technologies. Parry G; Jose S Physiol Plant; 2018 Dec; 164(4):372-377. PubMed ID: 29220093 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Strict EU ruling on gene-edited crops squeezes science. Wight AJ Nature; 2018 Nov; 563(7729):15-16. PubMed ID: 30377319 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. CRISPR-Cas9 and the Promise of a Better Future. Raposo VL Eur J Health Law; 2019 Oct; 26(4):308-329. PubMed ID: 31597119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. EU verdict on CRISPR crops dismays scientists. Kupferschmidt K Science; 2018 Aug; 361(6401):435-436. PubMed ID: 30072518 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Broad Institute wins bitter battle over CRISPR patents. Ledford H Nature; 2017 Feb; 542(7642):401. PubMed ID: 28230140 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. GARNet gene editing workshop. Parry G; Harrison CJ New Phytol; 2019 Jan; 221(2):640-643. PubMed ID: 30569609 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Editing EU legislation to fit plant genome editing: The use of genome editing technologies in plant breeding requires a novel regulatory approach for new plant varieties that involves farmers. Ricroch AE; Ammann K; Kuntz M EMBO Rep; 2016 Oct; 17(10):1365-1369. PubMed ID: 27629042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The EU Court of Justice extends the GMO Directive to gene-edited organisms. Ruffell D FEBS Lett; 2018 Nov; 592(22):3653-3657. PubMed ID: 30426476 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Legal issues regarding gene editing at the beginning of life: an EU perspective. De Miguel Beriain I Regen Med; 2017 Sep; 12(6):669-679. PubMed ID: 28976851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. EU proposal on CRISPR-edited crops is welcome - but not enough. Mehta D Nature; 2023 Jul; 619(7970):437. PubMed ID: 37464084 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. CRISPR-Cas9 claim sets and the potential to stifle innovation. Gray BN; Spruill WM Nat Biotechnol; 2017 Jul; 35(7):630-633. PubMed ID: 28700549 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Rogues and Regulation of Germline Editing. Charo RA N Engl J Med; 2019 Mar; 380(10):976-980. PubMed ID: 30650001 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Revamp of UK CRISPR regulation will require public trust. Nature; 2021 Mar; 591(7850):345. PubMed ID: 33727726 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Europe's first and last field trial of gene-edited plants? Faure JD; Napier JA Elife; 2018 Dec; 7():. PubMed ID: 30558714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]