These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28230399)

  • 1. Not all probabilities are equivalent: Evidence from orientation versus spatial probability learning.
    Jabar SB; Anderson B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 May; 43(5):853-867. PubMed ID: 28230399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tuned by experience: How orientation probability modulates early perceptual processing.
    Jabar SB; Filipowicz A; Anderson B
    Vision Res; 2017 Sep; 138():86-96. PubMed ID: 28768151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Knowing where is different from knowing what: Distinct response time profiles and accuracy effects for target location, orientation, and color probability.
    Jabar SB; Filipowicz A; Anderson B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Nov; 79(8):2338-2353. PubMed ID: 28842834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Probability shapes perceptual precision: A study in orientation estimation.
    Jabar SB; Anderson B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1666-79. PubMed ID: 26280261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implicit location probability learning does not induce baseline shifts of visuospatial attention.
    Addleman DA; Schmidt AL; Remington RW; Jiang YV
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):552-558. PubMed ID: 30887446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial suppression due to statistical regularities is driven by distractor suppression not by target activation.
    Failing M; Wang B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1405-1414. PubMed ID: 30868474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Implicitly-learned spatial attention is unimpaired in patients with Parkinson's disease.
    Sisk CA; Twedell EL; Koutstaal W; Cooper SE; Jiang YV
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Oct; 119():34-44. PubMed ID: 30063912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Feature reliability determines specificity and transfer of perceptual learning in orientation search.
    Yashar A; Denison RN
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Dec; 13(12):e1005882. PubMed ID: 29240813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spatial reference frame of incidentally learned attention.
    Jiang YV; Swallow KM
    Cognition; 2013 Mar; 126(3):378-90. PubMed ID: 23287419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Specificity and persistence of statistical learning in distractor suppression.
    Britton MK; Anderson BA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Mar; 46(3):324-334. PubMed ID: 31886698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of selection history on auditory spatial attention.
    Addleman DA; Jiang YV
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Apr; 45(4):474-488. PubMed ID: 30816786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Orienting attention to locations in internal representations.
    Griffin IC; Nobre AC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Nov; 15(8):1176-94. PubMed ID: 14709235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The footprints of visual attention during search with 100% valid and 100% invalid cues.
    Eckstein MP; Pham BT; Shimozaki SS
    Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1193-207. PubMed ID: 15066385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attentional effects on orientation judgements are dependent on memory consolidation processes.
    Haskell C; Anderson B
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016 Nov; 69(11):2147-65. PubMed ID: 26595533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Probability cuing of target location facilitates visual search implicitly in normal participants and patients with hemispatial neglect.
    Geng JJ; Behrmann M
    Psychol Sci; 2002 Nov; 13(6):520-5. PubMed ID: 12430835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acquisition of habitual visual attention and transfer to related tasks.
    Salovich NA; Remington RW; Jiang YV
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Jun; 25(3):1052-1058. PubMed ID: 28698989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Task specificity of attention training: the case of probability cuing.
    Jiang YV; Swallow KM; Won BY; Cistera JD; Rosenbaum GM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jan; 77(1):50-66. PubMed ID: 25113853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Probability and the changing shape of response distributions for orientation.
    Anderson B
    J Vis; 2014 Nov; 14(13):15. PubMed ID: 25406160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of spatial and feature probability cuing in visual search.
    Schwark J; Dolgov I
    Perception; 2013; 42(4):470-2. PubMed ID: 23866559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Competition between simultaneous stimuli modulated by location probability in hemispatial neglect.
    Geng JJ; Behrmann M
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(7):1050-60. PubMed ID: 16330056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.