123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28230532)
1. Optimization of volumetric breast density estimation in digital mammograms.
Holland K; Gubern-Mérida A; Mann RM; Karssemeijer N
Phys Med Biol; 2017 May; 62(9):3779-3797. PubMed ID: 28230532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Volumetric breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms.
van Engeland S; Snoeren PR; Huisman H; Boetes C; Karssemeijer N
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Mar; 25(3):273-82. PubMed ID: 16524084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fatty and fibroglandular tissue volumes in the breasts of women 20-83 years old: comparison of X-ray mammography and computer-assisted MR imaging.
Lee NA; Rusinek H; Weinreb J; Chandra R; Toth H; Singer C; Newstead G
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Feb; 168(2):501-6. PubMed ID: 9016235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correlation between mammographic density and volumetric fibroglandular tissue estimated on breast MR images.
Wei J; Chan HP; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Zhou C; Paquerault S; Chenevert T; Goodsitt MM
Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):933-42. PubMed ID: 15125012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantification of masking risk in screening mammography with volumetric breast density maps.
Holland K; van Gils CH; Mann RM; Karssemeijer N
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Apr; 162(3):541-548. PubMed ID: 28161786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Using deep learning to segment breast and fibroglandular tissue in MRI volumes.
Dalmış MU; Litjens G; Holland K; Setio A; Mann R; Karssemeijer N; Gubern-Mérida A
Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):533-546. PubMed ID: 28035663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automated volumetric breast density measures: differential change between breasts in women with and without breast cancer.
Brandt KR; Scott CG; Miglioretti DL; Jensen MR; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Hruska C; Ma L; Wu FF; Cummings SR; Norman AD; Engmann NJ; Shepherd JA; Winham SJ; Kerlikowske K; Vachon CM
Breast Cancer Res; 2019 Oct; 21(1):118. PubMed ID: 31660981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automated Breast Density Computation in Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Influence on Mean Glandular Dose and BIRADS Density Categorization.
Castillo-García M; Chevalier M; Garayoa J; Rodriguez-Ruiz A; García-Pinto D; Valverde J
Acad Radiol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):802-810. PubMed ID: 28214227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Yield of Pre-operative Breast MRI in Patients According to Breast Tissue Density.
Seely JM; Lamb L; Malik N; Lau J
Eur Radiol; 2016 Sep; 26(9):3280-9. PubMed ID: 26620958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Area-based breast percentage density estimation in mammograms using weight-adaptive multitask learning.
Gudhe NR; Behravan H; Sudah M; Okuma H; Vanninen R; Kosma VM; Mannermaa A
Sci Rep; 2022 Jul; 12(1):12060. PubMed ID: 35835933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Volumetric breast density characteristics as determined from digital mammograms.
Alonzo-Proulx O; Jong RA; Yaffe MJ
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(22):7443-57. PubMed ID: 23093428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Utility of U-Net for the objective segmentation of the fibroglandular tissue region on clinical digital mammograms.
Yamamuro M; Asai Y; Hashimoto N; Yasuda N; Kimura H; Yamada T; Nemoto M; Kimura Y; Handa H; Yoshida H; Abe K; Tada M; Habe H; Nagaoka T; Nin S; Ishii K; Kondo Y
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2022 Jun; 8(4):. PubMed ID: 35728581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relationship between 18F-FDG uptake and breast density in women with normal breast tissue.
Vranjesevic D; Schiepers C; Silverman DH; Quon A; Villalpando J; Dahlbom M; Phelps ME; Czernin J
J Nucl Med; 2003 Aug; 44(8):1238-42. PubMed ID: 12902413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automated Volumetric Mammographic Breast Density Measurements May Underestimate Percent Breast Density for High-density Breasts.
Rahbar K; Gubern-Merida A; Patrie JT; Harvey JA
Acad Radiol; 2017 Dec; 24(12):1561-1569. PubMed ID: 28754209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Volumetric breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms: a validation study.
Gubern-Mérida A; Kallenberg M; Platel B; Mann RM; Martí R; Karssemeijer N
PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e85952. PubMed ID: 24465808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiation dose affected by mammographic composition and breast size: first application of a radiation dose management system for full-field digital mammography in Korean women.
Baek JE; Kang BJ; Kim SH; Lee HS
World J Surg Oncol; 2017 Feb; 15(1):38. PubMed ID: 28153022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In vivo measurement of the effective atomic number of breast skin using spectral mammography.
Berggren K; Eriksson M; Hall P; Wallis MG; Fredenberg E
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Oct; 63(21):215023. PubMed ID: 30375362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Volumetric breast composition analysis: reproducibility of breast percent density and fibroglandular tissue volume measurements in serial mammograms.
Engelken F; Singh JM; Fallenberg EM; Bick U; Böttcher J; Renz DM
Acta Radiol; 2014 Feb; 55(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 23878356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of volumetric breast density estimations from mammography and thorax CT.
Geeraert N; Klausz R; Cockmartin L; Muller S; Bosmans H; Bloch I
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Aug; 59(15):4391-409. PubMed ID: 25049219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
