These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28231296)

  • 1. Cooperation, decision time, and culture: Online experiments with American and Indian participants.
    Nishi A; Christakis NA; Rand DG
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171252. PubMed ID: 28231296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Punishment is slower than cooperation or defection in online network games.
    Dewey G; Ando H; Ikesu R; Brewer TF; Goto R; Nishi A
    Sci Rep; 2024 Oct; 14(1):23024. PubMed ID: 39362883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Asymmetric effects of social and economic incentives on cooperation in real effort based public goods games.
    Hackel J; Yamamoto H; Okada I; Goto A; Taudes A
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0249217. PubMed ID: 33852605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Social Environment Shapes the Speed of Cooperation.
    Nishi A; Christakis NA; Evans AM; O'Malley AJ; Rand DG
    Sci Rep; 2016 Jul; 6():29622. PubMed ID: 27435940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Social setting, intuition and experience in laboratory experiments interact to shape cooperative decision-making.
    Capraro V; Cococcioni G
    Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Jul; 282(1811):. PubMed ID: 26156762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dynamic social networks promote cooperation in experiments with humans.
    Rand DG; Arbesman S; Christakis NA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Nov; 108(48):19193-8. PubMed ID: 22084103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of reputational and social knowledge on cooperation.
    Gallo E; Yan C
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Mar; 112(12):3647-52. PubMed ID: 25775544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intuitive cooperators: Time pressure increases children's cooperative decisions in a modified public goods game.
    Corbit J; Dockrill M; Hartlin S; Moore C
    Dev Sci; 2023 Jul; 26(4):e13344. PubMed ID: 36399363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cooperation and contagion in web-based, networked public goods experiments.
    Suri S; Watts DJ
    PLoS One; 2011 Mar; 6(3):e16836. PubMed ID: 21412431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Positive interactions may decrease cooperation in social dilemma experiments.
    Wardil L; Silva IR; da Silva JKL
    Sci Rep; 2019 Jan; 9(1):1017. PubMed ID: 30705328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the long-run efficacy of punishments and recommendations in a laboratory public goods game.
    Chaudhuri A; Paichayontvijit T
    Sci Rep; 2017 Sep; 7(1):12286. PubMed ID: 28947764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Uncalculating cooperation is used to signal trustworthiness.
    Jordan JJ; Hoffman M; Nowak MA; Rand DG
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Jul; 113(31):8658-63. PubMed ID: 27439873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A functional MRI study on how oxytocin affects decision making in social dilemmas: Cooperate as long as it pays off, aggress only when you think you can win.
    Lambert B; Declerck CH; Boone C; Parizel PM
    Horm Behav; 2017 Aug; 94():145-152. PubMed ID: 28676252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of $1, $5 and $10 stakes in an online dictator game.
    Raihani NJ; Mace R; Lamba S
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(8):e73131. PubMed ID: 23951342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Response time in economic games reflects different types of decision conflict for prosocial and proself individuals.
    Yamagishi T; Matsumoto Y; Kiyonari T; Takagishi H; Li Y; Kanai R; Sakagami M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Jun; 114(24):6394-6399. PubMed ID: 28559334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Social rank and social cooperation: Impact of social comparison processes on cooperative decision-making.
    Gong X; Sanfey AG
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0175472. PubMed ID: 28388684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evolution of cooperation in stochastic games.
    Hilbe C; Šimsa Š; Chatterjee K; Nowak MA
    Nature; 2018 Jul; 559(7713):246-249. PubMed ID: 29973718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Punishment diminishes the benefits of network reciprocity in social dilemma experiments.
    Li X; Jusup M; Wang Z; Li H; Shi L; Podobnik B; Stanley HE; Havlin S; Boccaletti S
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Jan; 115(1):30-35. PubMed ID: 29259113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cooperation and decision time.
    Evans AM; Rand DG
    Curr Opin Psychol; 2019 Apr; 26():67-71. PubMed ID: 29879640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cultural impediments to learning to cooperate: An experimental study of high- and low-caste men in rural India.
    Brooks BA; Hoff K; Pandey P
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Nov; 115(45):11385-11392. PubMed ID: 30397115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.