These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28231638)

  • 21. Variations in mouthguard thickness according to fabrication method.
    Mizuhashi F; Koide K; Takahashi M
    Dent Traumatol; 2015 Apr; 31(2):130-5. PubMed ID: 25279665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Appropriate fabrication method for vacuum-formed mouthguards.
    Mizuhashi F; Koide K
    Dent Traumatol; 2017 Apr; 33(2):110-113. PubMed ID: 27500893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Modifying the biomechanical response of mouthguards with hard inserts: A finite element study.
    Verissimo C; Santos-Filho PC; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A; Soares CJ
    Am J Dent; 2015 Apr; 28(2):116-20. PubMed ID: 26087579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparative evaluation of shock absorption ability of custom-fit mouthguards with new-generation polyolefin self-adapting mouthguards in three different maxillary anterior teeth alignments using Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG) sensors.
    Grewal N; Kumari F; Tiwari U
    Dent Traumatol; 2015 Aug; 31(4):294-301. PubMed ID: 25425316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Appropriate fabrication method for pressure-formed mouthguards using ethylene vinyl acetate sheets.
    Mizuhashi F; Koide K
    Dent Traumatol; 2018 Feb; 34(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 28901719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Scale of protection and the various types of sports mouthguard.
    Patrick DG; van Noort R; Found MS
    Br J Sports Med; 2005 May; 39(5):278-81. PubMed ID: 15849291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Study on cushioning and energy absorption of sports mouthguard].
    Bao SJ; Ye SJ; Ren XW; Chen QY; Wei B; Gong Y
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2021 Feb; 30(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 33907780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparing comfort and wearability between Type III single-layered and double-layered EVA mouthguards.
    Kenyon BJ; Loos LG
    Gen Dent; 2005; 53(4):261-4. PubMed ID: 16158793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of forces transmitted through different EVA mouthguards.
    Duhaime CF; Whitmyer CC; Butler RS; Kuban B
    Dent Traumatol; 2006 Aug; 22(4):186-92. PubMed ID: 16872387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An improved mouthguard material.
    Westerman B; Stringfellow PM; Eccleston JA
    Aust Dent J; 1997 Jun; 42(3):189-91. PubMed ID: 9241931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Thermoforming technique for maintaining the thickness of single-layer mouthguard during pressure formation.
    Takahashi M; Bando Y
    Dent Traumatol; 2019 Oct; 35(4-5):285-290. PubMed ID: 30927555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Influence of working model angle on the formation of a pressure-formed mouthguard.
    Mizuhashi F; Koide K; Mizuhashi R
    Dent Traumatol; 2017 Jun; 33(3):189-193. PubMed ID: 27960037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of commercially available mouthguards and a custom mouthguard.
    Guevara PH; Hondrum SO; Reichl RB
    Gen Dent; 2001; 49(4):402-6. PubMed ID: 12016685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Difference in vacuum-formed mouthguard thickness according to heating condition.
    Mizuhashi F; Koide K; Takahashi M
    Dent Traumatol; 2015 Jun; 31(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 25351525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of a dentoalveolar model for testing mouthguards: stress and strain analyses.
    Verissimo C; Costa PV; Santos-Filho PC; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A; Soares CJ
    Dent Traumatol; 2016 Feb; 32(1):4-13. PubMed ID: 26139006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The influence of impact object characteristics on impact force and force absorption by mouthguard material.
    Takeda T; Ishigami K; Shintaro K; Nakajima K; Shimada A; Regner CW
    Dent Traumatol; 2004 Feb; 20(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 14998410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Forming temperature of ethylene vinyl acetate sheets for fabrication of vacuum-formed mouthguards.
    Mizuhashi R; Ogura I; Sugawara Y; Oohashi M; Sekiguchi H; Saegusa H; Mizuhashi F
    Dent Traumatol; 2020 Oct; 36(5):538-542. PubMed ID: 32034882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The influence of the sensor type on the measured impact absorption of mouthguard material.
    Takeda T; Ishigami K; Jun H; Nakajima K; Shimada A; Ogawa T
    Dent Traumatol; 2004 Feb; 20(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 14998412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An investigation into the relationship between thickness variations and manufacturing techniques of mouthguards.
    Farrington T; Coward T; Onambele-Pearson G; Taylor RL; Earl P; Winwood K
    Dent Traumatol; 2016 Feb; 32(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 26095259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of different thicknesses of mouthguards according to the groove shape of sheets.
    Son HJ; Sim JY; Kim JH; Kim WC
    Dent Traumatol; 2018 Oct; 34(5):360-364. PubMed ID: 29774658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.