283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28231767)
1. Performance of Firth-and logF-type penalized methods in risk prediction for small or sparse binary data.
Rahman MS; Sultana M
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Feb; 17(1):33. PubMed ID: 28231767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On estimation for accelerated failure time models with small or rare event survival data.
Alam TF; Rahman MS; Bari W
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Jun; 22(1):169. PubMed ID: 35689190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Confidence intervals for multinomial logistic regression in sparse data.
Bull SB; Lewinger JP; Lee SS
Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):903-18. PubMed ID: 16489602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bias-reduced and separation-proof GEE with small or sparse longitudinal binary data.
Mondol MH; Rahman MS
Stat Med; 2019 Jun; 38(14):2544-2560. PubMed ID: 30793784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Penalized maximum likelihood inference under the mixture cure model in sparse data.
Xu C; Bull SB
Stat Med; 2023 Jun; 42(13):2134-2161. PubMed ID: 36964996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sample size considerations and predictive performance of multinomial logistic prediction models.
de Jong VMT; Eijkemans MJC; van Calster B; Timmerman D; Moons KGM; Steyerberg EW; van Smeden M
Stat Med; 2019 Apr; 38(9):1601-1619. PubMed ID: 30614028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of likelihood penalization and variance decomposition approaches for clinical prediction models: A simulation study.
Lohmann A; Groenwold RHH; van Smeden M
Biom J; 2024 Jan; 66(1):e2200108. PubMed ID: 37199142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An investigation of penalization and data augmentation to improve convergence of generalized estimating equations for clustered binary outcomes.
Geroldinger A; Blagus R; Ogden H; Heinze G
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Jun; 22(1):168. PubMed ID: 35681120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. To tune or not to tune, a case study of ridge logistic regression in small or sparse datasets.
Šinkovec H; Heinze G; Blagus R; Geroldinger A
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Sep; 21(1):199. PubMed ID: 34592945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bias-reduced and separation-proof conditional logistic regression with small or sparse data sets.
Heinze G; Puhr R
Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):770-7. PubMed ID: 20213709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Penalization, bias reduction, and default priors in logistic and related categorical and survival regressions.
Greenland S; Mansournia MA
Stat Med; 2015 Oct; 34(23):3133-43. PubMed ID: 26011599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Review and evaluation of penalised regression methods for risk prediction in low-dimensional data with few events.
Pavlou M; Ambler G; Seaman S; De Iorio M; Omar RZ
Stat Med; 2016 Mar; 35(7):1159-77. PubMed ID: 26514699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression.
Heinze G; Schemper M
Stat Med; 2002 Aug; 21(16):2409-19. PubMed ID: 12210625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Firth's logistic regression with rare events: accurate effect estimates and predictions?
Puhr R; Heinze G; Nold M; Lusa L; Geroldinger A
Stat Med; 2017 Jun; 36(14):2302-2317. PubMed ID: 28295456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Solutions to problems of nonexistence of parameter estimates and sparse data bias in Poisson regression.
Joshi A; Geroldinger A; Jiricka L; Senchaudhuri P; Corcoran C; Heinze G
Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 Feb; 31(2):253-266. PubMed ID: 34931909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Regression shrinkage methods for clinical prediction models do not guarantee improved performance: Simulation study.
Van Calster B; van Smeden M; De Cock B; Steyerberg EW
Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Nov; 29(11):3166-3178. PubMed ID: 32401702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Penalized Cox regression analysis in the high-dimensional and low-sample size settings, with applications to microarray gene expression data.
Gui J; Li H
Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(13):3001-8. PubMed ID: 15814556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Inferential tools in penalized logistic regression for small and sparse data: A comparative study.
Siino M; Fasola S; Muggeo VM
Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 May; 27(5):1365-1375. PubMed ID: 27510370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Penalized maximum likelihood estimation to directly adjust diagnostic and prognostic prediction models for overoptimism: a clinical example.
Moons KG; Donders AR; Steyerberg EW; Harrell FE
J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 57(12):1262-70. PubMed ID: 15617952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An accurate substitution method for analyzing censored data.
Ganser GH; Hewett P
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Apr; 7(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 20169489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
