263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28231958)
1. Reliability of Two Smartphone Applications for Radiographic Measurements of Hallux Valgus Angles.
Mattos E Dinato MC; Freitas MF; Milano C; Valloto E; Ninomiya AF; Pagnano RG
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2017; 56(2):230-233. PubMed ID: 28231958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiographic angles in hallux valgus: differences between measurements made manually and with a computerized program.
Piqué-Vidal C; Maled-García I; Arabi-Moreno J; Vila J
Foot Ankle Int; 2006 Mar; 27(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 16539898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radiographic measurements in patients with hallux valgus before and after proximal crescentic osteotomy.
Shima H; Okuda R; Yasuda T; Jotoku T; Kitano N; Kinoshita M
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Jun; 91(6):1369-76. PubMed ID: 19487514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability of Visual Estimation of the First Intermetatarsal Angle.
Higashi M; Shofler D; Manji K; Penera K
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2017; 56(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 27989352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Effect of Incorrect Foot Placement on the Accuracy of Radiographic Measurements of the Hallux Valgus and Inter-Metatarsal Angles for Treating Hallux Valgus.
Kuyucu E; Ceylan HH; Surucu S; Erdil I; Kara A; Gulenc BG; Bulbul M; Erdil M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2017; 84(3):196-201. PubMed ID: 28809639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiographic angles in hallux valgus: Comparison between protractor and iPhone measurements.
Meng HZ; Zhang WL; Li XC; Yang MW
J Orthop Res; 2015 Aug; 33(8):1250-4. PubMed ID: 25763918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intra- and Interobserver Agreement in Hallux Valgus Angle Measurements on Weightbearing and Non-Weightbearing Radiographs.
van der Woude P; Keizer SB; Wever-Korevaar M; Thomassen BJW
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2019 Jul; 58(4):706-712. PubMed ID: 31256898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A novel rapid measurement of hallux valgus parameters using the built-in photo edit function of smartphones.
Huang T; Wang L; Lu C; Zhong W; Zhao Z; Luo X
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Aug; 22(1):716. PubMed ID: 34419028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability of different smartphones measuring the hallux valgus parameters in a new rapid method: a follow-up study.
Wang L; Zhang C; Liang H; Zhang J; Zhong W; Zhao Z; Huang T; Luo X
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Apr; 23(1):315. PubMed ID: 35366850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validity and reliability of hallux valgus angle measurement on smartphone digital photographs.
Cakar A; Kose O; Dogruoz F; Selcuk H; Kirtis T; Egerci OF
J Foot Ankle Res; 2023 Oct; 16(1):70. PubMed ID: 37840128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability of 2 Smartphone Applications for Cobb Angle Measurement in Scoliosis.
Ketenci İE; Yanık HS; Erdoğan Ö; Adıyeke L; Erdem Ş
Clin Orthop Surg; 2021 Mar; 13(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 33747380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Inter- and intra-observer reliability of a smartphone application for measuring hallux valgus angles.
Walter R; Kosy JD; Cove R
Foot Ankle Surg; 2013 Mar; 19(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 23337271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility of hallux valgus angular measurements and the study of a linear measurement.
Sanhudo JV; Gomes JE; Rabello MC; Delucca G
Foot Ankle Spec; 2012 Dec; 5(6):374-7. PubMed ID: 22965218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. "Angle to Be Corrected" in Preoperative Evaluation for Hallux Valgus Surgery: Analysis of a New Angular Measurement.
Ortiz C; Wagner P; Vela O; Fischman D; Cavada G; Wagner E
Foot Ankle Int; 2016 Feb; 37(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 26525223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Goniometric versus computerized angle measurement in assessing hallux valgus.
Farber DC; Deorio JK; Steel MW
Foot Ankle Int; 2005 Mar; 26(3):234-8. PubMed ID: 15766427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of the iPhone for radiographic evaluation of hallux valgus.
Ege T; Kose O; Koca K; Demiralp B; Basbozkurt M
Skeletal Radiol; 2013 Feb; 42(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 22669733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiographic angles in hallux valgus: comparison between manual and computer-assisted measurements.
Srivastava S; Chockalingam N; El Fakhri T
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2010; 49(6):523-8. PubMed ID: 20833569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hallux valgus interphalangeus: reliability of radiological assessment.
Hujazi I; Yassa R; Sevenoaks H; Khalfaoui M; Barrie J
Foot Ankle Surg; 2019 Aug; 25(4):507-510. PubMed ID: 30321956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validity and reliability of hallux valgus angle measured on digital photographs.
Nix S; Russell T; Vicenzino B; Smith M
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2012 Jul; 42(7):642-8. PubMed ID: 22282040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The hallux valgus angle of the margo medialis pedis as an alternative to the measurement of the metatarsophalangeal hallux valgus angle.
Klein C; Kinz W; Zembsch A; Groll-Knapp E; Kundi M
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2014 Apr; 15():133. PubMed ID: 24751201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
