BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28232233)

  • 1. A predator equalizes rate of capture of a schooling prey in a patchy environment.
    Vijayan S; Kotler BP; Abramsky Z
    Behav Processes; 2017 May; 138():91-95. PubMed ID: 28232233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Time to revisit? A predator's previous successes and failures in prey capture determine its return time to patches.
    Vijayan S; Lee JK; Balaban-Feld J; Mitchell WA; Kotler BP; Rosenzweig ML; Lotan TT; Abramsky Z
    Oecologia; 2019 Jun; 190(2):387-397. PubMed ID: 31147778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How does the presence of a conspecific individual change the behavioral game that a predator plays with its prey?
    Vardi R; Abramsky Z; Kotler BP; Altstein O; Rosenzweig ML
    Oecologia; 2017 Jul; 184(3):597-607. PubMed ID: 28516320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimal foraging of little egrets and their prey in a foraging game in a patchy environment.
    Katz MW; Abramsky Z; Kotler BP; Rosenzweig ML; Alteshtein O; Vasserman G
    Am Nat; 2013 Mar; 181(3):381-95. PubMed ID: 23448887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Social behaviour and foraging success of little egrets (Egretta garzetta).
    Vardi R; Kotler BP; Altstein O; Abramsky Z
    Behav Processes; 2021 Feb; 183():104318. PubMed ID: 33434628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 'Take-away' foraging spatially uncouples predator and prey-attack distributions.
    Smallegange IM; van der Meer J; Sabelis MW
    J Anim Ecol; 2010 Jul; 79(4):769-76. PubMed ID: 20443987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Density-dependent prey mortality is determined by the spatial scale of predator foraging.
    McCarthy EK; White JW
    Oecologia; 2016 Feb; 180(2):305-11. PubMed ID: 26116266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ratio- and predator-dependent functional forms for predators optimally foraging in patches.
    Anderson JJ
    Am Nat; 2010 Feb; 175(2):240-9. PubMed ID: 20028238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What do predators really want? The role of gerbil energetic state in determining prey choice by Barn Owls.
    Embar K; Mukherjee S; Kotler BP
    Ecology; 2014 Feb; 95(2):280-5. PubMed ID: 24669722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tracking prey or tracking the prey's resource? Mechanisms of movement and optimal habitat selection by predators.
    Flaxman SM; Lou Y
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Jan; 256(2):187-200. PubMed ID: 18952108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scaling the effects of predation and disturbance in a patchy environment.
    Lancaster J
    Oecologia; 1996 Aug; 107(3):321-331. PubMed ID: 28307260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. State-dependent foraging among social fish in a risky environment.
    Balaban-Feld J; Mitchell WA; Kotler BP; Vijayan S; Tov Elem LT; Abramsky Z
    Oecologia; 2019 May; 190(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 30929073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Behavioral response races, predator-prey shell games, ecology of fear, and patch use of pumas and their ungulate prey.
    Laundré JW
    Ecology; 2010 Oct; 91(10):2995-3007. PubMed ID: 21058559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Binary patch assessment by goldfish under safe and dangerous conditions.
    Vijayan S; Kotler BP; Tamar Tov-Elem L; Mitchell WA; Abramsky Z
    Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():417-421. PubMed ID: 30056079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Foraging strategy mediates ectotherm predator-prey responses to climate warming.
    Twardochleb LA; Treakle TC; Zarnetske PL
    Ecology; 2020 Nov; 101(11):e03146. PubMed ID: 32726861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimal Bayesian foraging policies and prey population dynamics-some comments on Rodriguez-Girones and Vasquez.
    Olsson O; Holmgren NM
    Theor Popul Biol; 2000 Jun; 57(4):369-75. PubMed ID: 10900189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimal forager against ideal free distributed prey.
    Garay J; Cressman R; Xu F; Varga Z; Cabello T
    Am Nat; 2015 Jul; 186(1):111-22. PubMed ID: 26098343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does prey capture induce area-restricted search? A fine-scale study using GPS in a marine predator, the wandering albatross.
    Weimerskirch H; Pinaud D; Pawlowski F; Bost CA
    Am Nat; 2007 Nov; 170(5):734-43. PubMed ID: 17926295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Negotiating a noisy, information-rich environment in search of cryptic prey: olfactory predators need patchiness in prey cues.
    Carthey AJ; Bytheway JP; Banks PB
    J Anim Ecol; 2011 Jul; 80(4):742-52. PubMed ID: 21401592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Central-place foraging and ecological effects of an invasive predator across multiple habitats.
    Benkwitt CE
    Ecology; 2016 Oct; 97(10):2729-2739. PubMed ID: 27859117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.