These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28233050)

  • 1. Inverting the planning gradient: adjustment of grasps to late segments of multi-step object manipulations.
    Mathew H; Kunde W; Herbort O
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 May; 235(5):1397-1409. PubMed ID: 28233050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Habit outweighs planning in grasp selection for object manipulation.
    Herbort O; Mathew H; Kunde W
    Cogn Psychol; 2017 Feb; 92():127-140. PubMed ID: 27951435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Too much anticipation? Large anticipatory adjustments of grasping movements to minimal object manipulations.
    Herbort O
    Hum Mov Sci; 2015 Aug; 42():100-16. PubMed ID: 26004123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Individual differences in motor planning during a multi-segment object manipulation task.
    Seegelke C; Hughes CM; Schütz C; Schack T
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Oct; 222(1-2):125-36. PubMed ID: 22885998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of reducing intermediate target constraints on grasp posture planning during a three-segment object manipulation task.
    Seegelke C; Hughes CM; Knoblauch A; Schack T
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Feb; 233(2):529-38. PubMed ID: 25370347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The contribution of cognitive, kinematic, and dynamic factors to anticipatory grasp selection.
    Herbort O; Butz MV; Kunde W
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Jun; 232(6):1677-88. PubMed ID: 24534913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The continuous end-state comfort effect: weighted integration of multiple biases.
    Herbort O; Butz MV
    Psychol Res; 2012 May; 76(3):345-63. PubMed ID: 21499901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preschool children adapt grasping movements to upcoming object manipulations: Evidence from a dial rotation task.
    Herbort O; Büschelberger J; Janczyk M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Mar; 167():62-77. PubMed ID: 29154031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors influencing planning of a familiar grasp to an object: what it is to pick a cup.
    Rounis E; Zhang Z; Pizzamiglio G; Duta M; Humphreys G
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Apr; 235(4):1281-1296. PubMed ID: 28204861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Planning grasps for object manipulation: integrating internal preferences and external constraints.
    Herbort O; Butz MV
    Cogn Process; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 1():249-53. PubMed ID: 26224266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Grasp planning for object manipulation without simulation of the object manipulation action.
    Herbort O; Kirsch W; Kunde W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Feb; 45(2):237-254. PubMed ID: 30589359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Perturbations in action goal influence bimanual grasp posture planning.
    Hughes CM; Seegelke C
    J Mot Behav; 2013; 45(6):473-8. PubMed ID: 24006878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Grasp posture planning during multi-segment object manipulation tasks - interaction between cognitive and biomechanical factors.
    Seegelke C; Hughes CM; Knoblauch A; Schack T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Nov; 144(3):513-21. PubMed ID: 24095853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Limits of end-state planning.
    Hermens F; Kral D; Rosenbaum DA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 May; 148():148-62. PubMed ID: 24531145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Habitual and goal-directed factors in (everyday) object handling.
    Herbort O; Butz MV
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Sep; 213(4):371-82. PubMed ID: 21748333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Second-order grasp planning reflects sensitivity to inertial factors.
    Wagman JB; Abney DH; Rosenbaum DA
    Hum Mov Sci; 2018 Feb; 57():451-460. PubMed ID: 29074308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Where grasps are made reveals how grasps are planned: generation and recall of motor plans.
    Cohen RG; Rosenbaum DA
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Aug; 157(4):486-95. PubMed ID: 15071711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of initial and final precision on motor planning: individual differences in end-state comfort during unimanual grasping and placing.
    Hughes CM; Seegelke C; Schack T
    J Mot Behav; 2012; 44(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 22551086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influences of grasp selection in typically developing children.
    Wilmut K; Byrne M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 May; 148():181-7. PubMed ID: 24594384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective and retrospective effects in human motor control: planning grasps for object rotation and translation.
    Cohen RG; Rosenbaum DA
    Psychol Res; 2011 Jul; 75(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20941504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.