These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28233341)

  • 1. Dynamical analysis of dislocation-associated factors in total hip replacements by hardware-in-the-loop simulation.
    Geier A; Kluess D; Grawe R; Herrmann S; D'Lima D; Woernle C; Bader R
    J Orthop Res; 2017 Nov; 35(11):2557-2566. PubMed ID: 28233341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Novel Approach for Dynamic Testing of Total Hip Dislocation under Physiological Conditions.
    Herrmann S; Kluess D; Kaehler M; Grawe R; Rachholz R; Souffrant R; Zierath J; Bader R; Woernle C
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0145798. PubMed ID: 26717236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of femoral head size on impingement, dislocation and stress distribution in total hip replacement.
    Kluess D; Martin H; Mittelmeier W; Schmitz KP; Bader R
    Med Eng Phys; 2007 May; 29(4):465-71. PubMed ID: 16901743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Impingement Free Motion in Total Hip Arthroplasty - How Can We Implement It?].
    Widmer KH
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2016 Aug; 154(4):392-7. PubMed ID: 27336842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Anterior dislocation of a total hip replacement. Radiographic and CT-scan assessment. Behavior following conservative management.
    Di Schino M; Baudart F; Zilber S; Poignard A; Allain J
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Dec; 95(8):573-8. PubMed ID: 19945930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Theoretically optimum position of the prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty to fulfill the severe range of motion criteria due to neck impingement.
    Hisatome T; Doi H
    J Orthop Sci; 2011 Mar; 16(2):229-37. PubMed ID: 21359509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of acetabular component anteversion on dislocation mechanisms in total hip arthroplasty.
    Higa M; Tanino H; Abo M; Kakunai S; Banks SA
    J Biomech; 2011 Jun; 44(9):1810-3. PubMed ID: 21529811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hard-on-hard total hip impingement causes extreme contact stress concentrations.
    Elkins JM; O'Brien MK; Stroud NJ; Pedersen DR; Callaghan JJ; Brown TD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2011 Feb; 469(2):454-63. PubMed ID: 20953853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors affecting impingement and dislocation after total hip arthroplasty - Computer simulation analysis.
    Shoji T; Ota Y; Saka H; Murakami H; Takahashi W; Yamasaki T; Yasunaga Y; Iwamori H; Adachi N
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2020 Dec; 80():105151. PubMed ID: 32836081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion.
    Widmer KH; Zurfluh B
    J Orthop Res; 2004 Jul; 22(4):815-21. PubMed ID: 15183439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Position of the prosthesis and the incidence of dislocation following total hip replacement.
    He RX; Yan SG; Wu LD; Wang XH; Dai XS
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2007 Jul; 120(13):1140-4. PubMed ID: 17637241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What Safe Zone? The Vast Majority of Dislocated THAs Are Within the Lewinnek Safe Zone for Acetabular Component Position.
    Abdel MP; von Roth P; Jennings MT; Hanssen AD; Pagnano MW
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):386-91. PubMed ID: 26150264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Guidelines for implant placement to minimize impingement during activities of daily living after total hip arthroplasty.
    Patel AB; Wagle RR; Usrey MM; Thompson MT; Incavo SJ; Noble PC
    J Arthroplasty; 2010 Dec; 25(8):1275-81.e1. PubMed ID: 20022449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of hip implant alignment on muscle and joint loading during dynamic activities.
    Myers CA; Laz PJ; Shelburne KB; Judd DL; Huff DN; Winters JD; Stevens-Lapsley JE; Rullkoetter PJ
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2018 Mar; 53():93-100. PubMed ID: 29482087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of the CCD-angle on range of motion and cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty.
    Widmer KH; Majewski M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Aug; 20(7):723-8. PubMed ID: 15964112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bone-on-bone versus hardware impingement in total hips: a biomechanical study.
    Elkins JM; Pedersen DR; Callaghan JJ; Brown TD
    Iowa Orthop J; 2012; 32():17-21. PubMed ID: 23576916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Method for the evaluation of factors influencing the dislocation stability of total hip endoprotheses].
    Bader R; Scholz R; Steinhauser E; Busch R; Mittelmeier W
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2004 May; 49(5):137-44. PubMed ID: 15212199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dislocation rate after conversion from hip hemiarthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty.
    Sah AP; Estok DM
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Mar; 90(3):506-16. PubMed ID: 18310700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of total hip design on dislocation: a computer model and clinical analysis.
    Padgett DE; Lipman J; Robie B; Nestor BJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Jun; 447():48-52. PubMed ID: 16741474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Component impingement in total hip arthroplasty: frequency and risk factors. A continuous retrieval analysis series of 416 cup.
    Marchetti E; Krantz N; Berton C; Bocquet D; Fouilleron N; Migaud H; Girard J
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2011 Apr; 97(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 21377948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.