381 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28233347)
1. Validation of prediction model for successful vaginal birth after Cesarean delivery based on sonographic assessment of hysterotomy scar.
Baranov A; Salvesen KÅ; Vikhareva O
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 51(2):189-193. PubMed ID: 28233347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of Cesarean hysterotomy scar before pregnancy and at 11-14 weeks of gestation: a prospective cohort study.
Baranov A; Salvesen KÅ; Vikhareva O
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 50(1):105-109. PubMed ID: 27419374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hysterotomy level at Cesarean section and occurrence of large scar defects: a randomized single-blind trial.
Vikhareva O; Rickle GS; Lavesson T; Nedopekina E; Brandell K; Salvesen KÅ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 53(4):438-442. PubMed ID: 30484920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predicting successful vaginal birth after Cesarean section using a model based on Cesarean scar features examined by transvaginal sonography.
Naji O; Wynants L; Smith A; Abdallah Y; Stalder C; Sayasneh A; McIndoe A; Ghaem-Maghami S; Van Huffel S; Van Calster B; Timmerman D; Bourne T
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jun; 41(6):672-8. PubMed ID: 23371440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery at the university hospital in Barcelona.
Baranov A; Gratacós E; Vikhareva O; Figueras F
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Dec; 30(24):2998-3003. PubMed ID: 27936993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predicting the chance of vaginal delivery after one cesarean section: validation and elaboration of a published prediction model.
Fagerberg MC; Maršál K; Källén K
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 May; 188():88-94. PubMed ID: 25801723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of a vaginal birth after cesarean delivery prediction model in women with two prior cesarean deliveries.
Metz TD; Allshouse AA; Faucett AM; Grobman WA
Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Apr; 125(4):948-952. PubMed ID: 25751218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Third-trimester prediction of successful vaginal birth after one cesarean delivery-A Swedish model.
Carlsson Fagerberg M; Källén K
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 May; 99(5):660-668. PubMed ID: 31788783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Value of first-trimester ultrasound in prediction of third-trimester sonographic stage of placenta accreta spectrum disorder and surgical outcome.
Calí G; Timor-Tritsch IE; Forlani F; Palacios-Jaraquemada J; Monteagudo A; Kaelin Agten A; Flacco ME; Khalil A; Buca D; Manzoli L; Liberati M; D'Antonio F
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 55(4):450-459. PubMed ID: 31788885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Uterine scar rupture - Prediction, prevention, diagnosis, and management.
Tanos V; Toney ZA
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Aug; 59():115-131. PubMed ID: 30837118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Are prediction models for vaginal birth after cesarean accurate?
Harris BS; Heine RP; Park J; Faurot KR; Hopkins MK; Rivara AJ; Kemeny HR; Grotegut CA; Jelovsek JE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 220(5):492.e1-492.e7. PubMed ID: 30716285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does midtrimester cervical length aid in predicting vaginal birth after cesarean?
Miller ES; Sakowicz A; Donelan EA; Grobman WA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jun; 212(6):791.e1-4. PubMed ID: 25726519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Influencing factors and antenatal assessment of the vaginal birth after cesarean section].
Guo N; Bai RM; Qu PF; Huang P; He YP; Wang CL; Mi Y
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 54(6):369-374. PubMed ID: 31262120
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF).
Sentilhes L; Vayssière C; Beucher G; Deneux-Tharaux C; Deruelle P; Diemunsch P; Gallot D; Haumonté JB; Heimann S; Kayem G; Lopez E; Parant O; Schmitz T; Sellier Y; Rozenberg P; d'Ercole C
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2013 Sep; 170(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 23810846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
Costantine MM; Fox K; Byers BD; Mateus J; Ghulmiyyah LM; Blackwell S; Hankins GDV; Grobman WA; Saade G
Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Nov; 114(5):1029-1033. PubMed ID: 20168103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mid-trimester cervical length and prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Chinese parturients: A retrospective study.
Liu G; Zhou C; Wang S; Zhang H
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2023 Nov; 52(9):102647. PubMed ID: 37611746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of a prediction model for vaginal birth after caesarean.
Chaillet N; Bujold E; Dubé E; Grobman WA
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 Feb; 35(2):119-124. PubMed ID: 23470060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Clinical study on vaginal birth after cesarean].
He L; Chen M; He GL; Liu XX
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Aug; 51(8):586-91. PubMed ID: 27561937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical importance of appearance of cesarean hysterotomy scar at transvaginal ultrasonography in nonpregnant women.
Vikhareva Osser O; Valentin L
Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 117(3):525-532. PubMed ID: 21343754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Analysis of factors affecting vaginal birth after cesarean].
Wu SW; Lu YZ; Wang SS; Dong XJ; Fang JH; He D; Zhang WY
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Aug; 51(8):576-80. PubMed ID: 27561935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
