These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28233533)

  • 1. Meaningful Peer Review in Radiology: A Review of Current Practices and Potential Future Directions.
    Moriarity AK; Hawkins CM; Geis JR; Dreyer KJ; Kamer AP; Khandheria P; Morey J; Whitfill J; Wiggins RH; Itri JN
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Dec; 13(12 Pt A):1519-1524. PubMed ID: 28233533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiology peer-review feedback scorecards: optimizing transparency, accessibility, and education in a children׳s hospital.
    Iyer RS; Munsell A; Weinberger E
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2014; 43(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 24948210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The next level of radiology peer review: enterprise-wide education and improvement.
    Butler GJ; Forghani R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 May; 10(5):349-53. PubMed ID: 23642877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Consensus-oriented group peer review: a new process to review radiologist work output.
    Alkasab TK; Harvey HB; Gowda V; Thrall JH; Rosenthal DI; Gazelle GS
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Feb; 11(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 24139321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer Review: Lessons Learned in A Pediatric Radiology Department.
    Stanescu AL; Parisi MT; Weinberger E; Ferguson MR; Otto RK; Iyer RS
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2016; 45(2):139-48. PubMed ID: 26489791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Peer review in clinical radiology practice.
    Kaewlai R; Abujudeh H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Aug; 199(2):W158-62. PubMed ID: 22826416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimizing peer review: A year of experience after instituting a real-time comment-enhanced program at a children's hospital.
    Swanson JO; Thapa MM; Iyer RS; Otto RK; Weinberger E
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 May; 198(5):1121-5. PubMed ID: 22528902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. RADPEER peer review: relevance, use, concerns, challenges, and direction forward.
    Abujudeh H; Pyatt RS; Bruno MA; Chetlen AL; Buck D; Hobbs SK; Roth C; Truwit C; Agarwal R; Kennedy ST; Glenn L
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Sep; 11(9):899-904. PubMed ID: 24842585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peer Feedback, Learning, and Improvement: Answering the Call of the Institute of Medicine Report on Diagnostic Error.
    Larson DB; Donnelly LF; Podberesky DJ; Merrow AC; Sharpe RE; Kruskal JB
    Radiology; 2017 Apr; 283(1):231-241. PubMed ID: 27673509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Peer review in cardiothoracic radiology.
    Kanne JP
    J Thorac Imaging; 2014 Sep; 29(5):270-6; quiz 277-8. PubMed ID: 25160595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Just Culture: Practical Implementation for Radiologist Peer Review.
    Burns J; Miller T; Weiss JM; Erdfarb A; Silber D; Goldberg-Stein S
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Mar; 16(3):384-388. PubMed ID: 30584040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance results for a workstation-integrated radiology peer review quality assurance program.
    O'Keeffe MM; Davis TM; Siminoski K
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2016 Jun; 28(3):294-8. PubMed ID: 26892609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality assurance in radiology: peer review and peer feedback.
    Strickland NH
    Clin Radiol; 2015 Nov; 70(11):1158-64. PubMed ID: 26223739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality and variability in diagnostic radiology.
    Alpert HR; Hillman BJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Feb; 1(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 17411540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. RADPEER quality assurance program: a multifacility study of interpretive disagreement rates.
    Borgstede JP; Lewis RS; Bhargavan M; Sunshine JH
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Jan; 1(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 17411521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Practical considerations when implementing peer learning conferences.
    Ngo AV; Stanescu AL; Swenson DW; Moore MM; Sze RW; Iyer RS
    Pediatr Radiol; 2019 Apr; 49(4):526-530. PubMed ID: 30923885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Radiology peer review as an opportunity to reduce errors and improve patient care.
    Halsted MJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Dec; 1(12):984-7. PubMed ID: 17411742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnostic Error Categorization at Abdominal Imaging Peer Learning Conference.
    Del Gaizo AJ; Itri JN; Pendergrast TE; Tappouni R
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2019; 48(6):535-542. PubMed ID: 30244814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interrater agreement in the evaluation of discrepant imaging findings with the Radpeer system.
    Bender LC; Linnau KF; Meier EN; Anzai Y; Gunn ML
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Dec; 199(6):1320-7. PubMed ID: 23169725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. RADPEER scoring white paper.
    Jackson VP; Cushing T; Abujudeh HH; Borgstede JP; Chin KW; Grimes CK; Larson DB; Larson PA; Pyatt RS; Thorwarth WT
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Jan; 6(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 19111267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.