344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28233910)
21. The Impact of Age on Noise Sensitivity in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Shew MA; Herzog JA; Kallogjeri D; Chen S; Wick C; Durakovic N; McJunkin J; Buchman CA;
Otol Neurotol; 2022 Jan; 43(1):72-79. PubMed ID: 34889840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison between bilateral cochlear implants and Neurelec Digisonic(®) SP Binaural cochlear implant: speech perception, sound localization and patient self-assessment.
Bonnard D; Lautissier S; Bosset-Audoit A; Coriat G; Beraha M; Maunoury A; Martel J; Darrouzet V; Bébéar JP; Dauman R
Audiol Neurootol; 2013; 18(3):171-83. PubMed ID: 23548561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Speech Recognition as a Function of Age and Listening Experience in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
Murr AT; Canfarotta MW; O'Connell BP; Buss E; King ER; Bucker AL; Dillon SA; Rooth MA; Dedmon MM; Brown KD; Dillon MT
Laryngoscope; 2021 Sep; 131(9):2106-2111. PubMed ID: 34043247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Clinical Outcomes of the Cochlear™ Nucleus(®) 5 Cochlear Implant System and SmartSound™ 2 Signal Processing.
Runge CL; Henion K; Tarima S; Beiter A; Zwolan TA
J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jun; 27(6):425-440. PubMed ID: 27310402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Considerations for a Revised Adult Cochlear Implant Candidacy Evaluation Protocol.
Biever A; Amurao C; Mears M
Otol Neurotol; 2021 Jan; 42(1):159-164. PubMed ID: 33885262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Does quality of life depend on speech recognition performance for adult cochlear implant users?
Capretta NR; Moberly AC
Laryngoscope; 2016 Mar; 126(3):699-706. PubMed ID: 26256441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Delaying Cochlear Implantation Impacts Postoperative Speech Perception of Nontraditional Pediatric Candidates.
Park LR; Perkins EL; Woodard JS; Brown KD
Audiol Neurootol; 2021; 26(3):182-187. PubMed ID: 33352551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Improvement of cognitive function after cochlear implantation in elderly patients.
Mosnier I; Bebear JP; Marx M; Fraysse B; Truy E; Lina-Granade G; Mondain M; Sterkers-Artières F; Bordure P; Robier A; Godey B; Meyer B; Frachet B; Poncet-Wallet C; Bouccara D; Sterkers O
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2015 May; 141(5):442-50. PubMed ID: 25763680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Neurocognitive Factors Contributing to Cochlear Implant Candidacy.
Moberly AC; Castellanos I; Mattingly JK
Otol Neurotol; 2018 Dec; 39(10):e1010-e1018. PubMed ID: 30444846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of preoperative residual hearing on speech perception after cochlear implantation.
Adunka OF; Buss E; Clark MS; Pillsbury HC; Buchman CA
Laryngoscope; 2008 Nov; 118(11):2044-9. PubMed ID: 18813141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cochlear implantation for single-sided deafness: A multicenter study.
Sladen DP; Frisch CD; Carlson ML; Driscoll CL; Torres JH; Zeitler DM
Laryngoscope; 2017 Jan; 127(1):223-228. PubMed ID: 27346874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing.
Gantz BJ; Turner C; Gfeller KE; Lowder MW
Laryngoscope; 2005 May; 115(5):796-802. PubMed ID: 15867642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. (Even Off-Label) Cochlear Implantation in Single-Sided Deafness and Asymmetric Hearing Loss Results in Measurable Objective and Subjective Benefit.
Sydlowski SA; Farrokhian N; Carrozza M; Jamis C; Woodson E
Otol Neurotol; 2022 Sep; 43(8):e895-e902. PubMed ID: 35970168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Unilateral Hearing Loss: Understanding Speech Recognition and Localization Variability-Implications for Cochlear Implant Candidacy.
Firszt JB; Reeder RM; Holden LK
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):159-173. PubMed ID: 28067750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cochlear implantation outcome in straightforward cases: can we do more for adults who cannot understand speech using hearing aids alone?
Luntz M; Khuri M; Khayr R; Gedaon Khuri W; Yehudai N; Shpak T
Acta Otolaryngol; 2018 Dec; 138(12):1070-1079. PubMed ID: 30686138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comprehensive hearing aid assessment in adults with bilateral severe-profound sensorineural hearing loss who present for Cochlear implant evaluation.
Lupo JE; Biever A; Kelsall DC
Am J Otolaryngol; 2020; 41(2):102300. PubMed ID: 31761407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. From hearing with a cochlear implant and a contralateral hearing aid (CI/HA) to hearing with two cochlear implants (CI/CI): a within-subject design comparison.
Luntz M; Egra-Dagan D; Attias J; Yehudai N; Most T; Shpak T
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Dec; 35(10):1682-90. PubMed ID: 25275862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in the adolescent population.
Friedmann DR; Green J; Fang Y; Ensor K; Roland JT; Waltzman SB
Laryngoscope; 2015 Aug; 125(8):1952-8. PubMed ID: 25946482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Survey of the American Neurotology Society on Cochlear Implantation: Part 1, Candidacy Assessment and Expanding Indications.
Carlson ML; Sladen DP; Gurgel RK; Tombers NM; Lohse CM; Driscoll CL
Otol Neurotol; 2018 Jan; 39(1):e12-e19. PubMed ID: 29210952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
