318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28233917)
1. Restoration planning to guide Aichi targets in a megadiverse country.
Tobón W; Urquiza-Haas T; Koleff P; Schröter M; Ortega-Álvarez R; Campo J; Lindig-Cisneros R; Sarukhán J; Bonn A
Conserv Biol; 2017 Oct; 31(5):1086-1097. PubMed ID: 28233917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of inverse spatial conservation prioritization to avoid biological diversity loss outside protected areas.
Kareksela S; Moilanen A; Tuominen S; Kotiaho JS
Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1294-303. PubMed ID: 24033397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating complementary networks of restoration plantings for landscape-scale occurrence of temporally dynamic species.
Ikin K; Tulloch A; Gibbons P; Ansell D; Seddon J; Lindenmayer D
Conserv Biol; 2016 Oct; 30(5):1027-37. PubMed ID: 27040452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating approaches for scaling-up community-based marine-protected areas into socially equitable and ecologically representative networks.
Kockel A; Ban NC; Costa M; Dearden P
Conserv Biol; 2020 Feb; 34(1):137-147. PubMed ID: 31206826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Representation of critical natural capital in China.
Lü Y; Zhang L; Zeng Y; Fu B; Whitham C; Liu S; Wu B
Conserv Biol; 2017 Aug; 31(4):894-902. PubMed ID: 28218967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Urban sprawl into Natura 2000 network over Europe.
Concepción ED
Conserv Biol; 2021 Aug; 35(4):1063-1072. PubMed ID: 33377545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Aquaculture expansion in Brazilian freshwaters against the Aichi Biodiversity Targets.
Lima Junior DP; Magalhães ALB; Pelicice FM; Vitule JRS; Azevedo-Santos VM; Orsi ML; Simberloff D; Agostinho AA
Ambio; 2018 May; 47(4):427-440. PubMed ID: 29306998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Economic and ecological outcomes of flexible biodiversity offset systems.
Habib TJ; Farr DR; Schneider RR; Boutin S
Conserv Biol; 2013 Dec; 27(6):1313-23. PubMed ID: 23869724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Forest restoration: a global dataset for biodiversity and vegetation structure.
Crouzeilles R; Ferreira MS; Curran M
Ecology; 2016 Aug; 97(8):2167. PubMed ID: 27859188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. One size does not fit all: the emerging frontier in large-scale marine conservation.
Toonen RJ; Wilhelm T'; Maxwell SM; Wagner D; Bowen BW; Sheppard CR; Taei SM; Teroroko T; Moffitt R; Gaymer CF; Morgan L; Lewis N; Sheppard AL; Parks J; Friedlander AM;
Mar Pollut Bull; 2013 Dec; 77(1-2):7-10. PubMed ID: 24246654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating and expanding the European Union's protected-area network toward potential post-2020 coverage targets.
Müller A; Schneider UA; Jantke K
Conserv Biol; 2020 Jun; 34(3):654-665. PubMed ID: 32022301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multicriteria analysis of critical areas for restoration in a semiarid landscape: A comparison between stakeholder groups.
Derak M; Silva E; Climent-Gil E; Bonet A; López G; Cortina-Segarra J
J Environ Manage; 2023 Jun; 336():117545. PubMed ID: 36871448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Setting the scene for achievable post-2020 convention on biological diversity targets: A review of the impacts of invasive alien species on ecosystem services in Africa.
Egoh BN; Ntshotsho P; Maoela MA; Blanchard R; Ayompe LM; Rahlao S
J Environ Manage; 2020 May; 261():110171. PubMed ID: 32148262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Interpreting beta-diversity components over time to conserve metacommunities in highly dynamic ecosystems.
Ruhí A; Datry T; Sabo JL
Conserv Biol; 2017 Dec; 31(6):1459-1468. PubMed ID: 28188969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Global status of and prospects for protection of terrestrial geophysical diversity.
Sanderson EW; Segan DB; Watson JE
Conserv Biol; 2015 Jun; 29(3):649-56. PubMed ID: 25923989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Protected area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement as a threat to iconic protected areas.
Qin S; Golden Kroner RE; Cook C; Tesfaw AT; Braybrook R; Rodriguez CM; Poelking C; Mascia MB
Conserv Biol; 2019 Dec; 33(6):1275-1285. PubMed ID: 31192510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Addressing transboundary conservation challenges through marine spatial prioritization.
Gissi E; McGowan J; Venier C; Carlo DD; Musco F; Menegon S; Mackelworth P; Agardy T; Possingham H
Conserv Biol; 2018 Oct; 32(5):1107-1117. PubMed ID: 29767466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Conservation priorities for mammals in megadiverse Mexico: the efficiency of reserve networks.
Ceballos G
Ecol Appl; 2007 Mar; 17(2):569-78. PubMed ID: 17489260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Challenges during the execution, results, and monitoring phases of ecological restoration: Learning from a country-wide assessment.
Méndez-Toribio M; Martínez-Garza C; Ceccon E
PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0249573. PubMed ID: 33822816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving effectiveness of systematic conservation planning with density data.
Veloz S; Salas L; Altman B; Alexander J; Jongsomjit D; Elliott N; Ballard G
Conserv Biol; 2015 Aug; 29(4):1217-1227. PubMed ID: 25873240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
