These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28234406)
1. Reflections on bird and mammal risk assessment for plant protection products in the European Union: Past, present, and future. Brooks AC; Fryer M; Lawrence A; Pascual J; Sharp R Environ Toxicol Chem; 2017 Mar; 36(3):565-575. PubMed ID: 28234406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Focal Species Candidates for Pesticide Risk Assessment in European Rice Fields: A Review. Vallon M; Dietzen C; Laucht S; Ludwigs JD Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2018 Sep; 14(5):537-551. PubMed ID: 29691977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interpretation of aged sorption studies for pesticides and their use in European Union regulatory leaching assessments. Beulke S; van Beinum W; Suddaby L Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2015 Apr; 11(2):276-86. PubMed ID: 25565626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predicted Dermal and Dietary Exposure of Bats to Pesticides. Brooks AC; Nopper JH; Blakey A; Ebeling M; Foudoulakis M; Weyers A Environ Toxicol Chem; 2022 Oct; 41(10):2595-2602. PubMed ID: 35866471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Toward the definition of specific protection goals for the environmental risk assessment of chemicals: A perspective on environmental regulation in Europe. Brown AR; Whale G; Jackson M; Marshall S; Hamer M; Solga A; Kabouw P; Galay-Burgos M; Woods R; Nadzialek S; Maltby L Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Jan; 13(1):17-37. PubMed ID: 27243906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Draft DG SANCO document: addressing the new challenges for risk assessment--an industry perspective. Campbell P; Dohmen P Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Jul; 9(3):e81-4. PubMed ID: 23564648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Appropriate exposure estimates for wildlife risk assessments of crop protection products based on continuous radio telemetry: A case study with woodpigeons. Ludwigs JD; Ebeling M; Fredricks TB; Murfitt RC; Kragten S Environ Toxicol Chem; 2017 May; 36(5):1270-1277. PubMed ID: 27753137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Potential application of ecological models in the European environmental risk assessment of chemicals. I. Review of protection goals in EU directives and regulations. Hommen U; Baveco JM; Galic N; van den Brink PJ Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2010 Jul; 6(3):325-37. PubMed ID: 20821697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing the Risks to Bats from Plant Protection Products: A Review of the Recent European Food Safety Authority Statement Regarding Toxicity and Exposure Routes. Brooks AC; Nopper J; Weyers A; Crosland H; Foudoulakis M; Haaf S; Hackett M; Lawrence A Environ Toxicol Chem; 2021 Nov; 40(11):2978-2989. PubMed ID: 34499761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Focal species of birds in European crops for higher tier pesticide risk assessment. Dietzen C; Edwards PJ; Wolf C; Ludwigs JD; Luttik R Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2014 Apr; 10(2):247-59. PubMed ID: 24129982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Environmental risk assessment in agro-ecosystems: Revisiting the concept of receiving environment after the EFSA guidance document. Arpaia S Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2021 Jan; 208():111676. PubMed ID: 33396008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How to use mechanistic effect models in environmental risk assessment of pesticides: Case studies and recommendations from the SETAC workshop MODELINK. Hommen U; Forbes V; Grimm V; Preuss TG; Thorbek P; Ducrot V Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2016 Jan; 12(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 26437629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Design and analysis of field studies with bees: A critical review of the draft EFSA guidance. Bakker F Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2016 Jul; 12(3):422-8. PubMed ID: 26436642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An evaluation of fish early life stage tests for predicting reproductive and longer-term toxicity from plant protection product active substances. Wheeler JR; Maynard SK; Crane M Environ Toxicol Chem; 2014 Aug; 33(8):1874-8. PubMed ID: 24799351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk assessment of pesticides and other stressors in bees: Principles, data gaps and perspectives from the European Food Safety Authority. Rortais A; Arnold G; Dorne JL; More SJ; Sperandio G; Streissl F; Szentes C; Verdonck F Sci Total Environ; 2017 Jun; 587-588():524-537. PubMed ID: 28279532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Health risk assessment procedures for endocrine disrupting compounds within different regulatory frameworks in the European Union. Beronius A; Rudén C; Hanberg A; Håkansson H Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Nov; 55(2):111-22. PubMed ID: 19500631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Secondary poisoning risk assessment of terrestrial birds and mammals exposed to nickel. DeForest DK; Schlekat CE; Brix KV; Fairbrother A Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Jan; 8(1):107-19. PubMed ID: 21793198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Integrated testing and intelligent assessment-new challenges under REACH. Ahlers J; Stock F; Werschkun B Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2008 Oct; 15(7):565-72. PubMed ID: 18818964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Energy Content, Moisture Content, and Energy Assimilation Efficiency by Birds and Mammals of Oil-Containing Seeds and Implications for Seed Treatment Risk Assessments for Birds and Mammals. Gutiérrez-Expósito C; Russ A; Sainz-Elipe R; Wolf C; Kragten S Environ Toxicol Chem; 2024 Sep; 43(9):2080-2085. PubMed ID: 39051738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. PBT assessment using the revised annex XIII of REACH: a comparison with other regulatory frameworks. Moermond CT; Janssen MP; de Knecht JA; Montforts MH; Peijnenburg WJ; Zweers PG; Sijm DT Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Apr; 8(2):359-71. PubMed ID: 22006646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]