309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28234772)
1. Minimally Invasive Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy: Freiburg Experience With 34 Patients.
Peto I; Scheiwe C; Kogias E; Hubbe U
Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Dec; 30(10):E1419-E1425. PubMed ID: 28234772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Complications, outcomes, and need for fusion after minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy and microdiscectomy.
Skovrlj B; Gologorsky Y; Haque R; Fessler RG; Qureshi SA
Spine J; 2014 Oct; 14(10):2405-11. PubMed ID: 24486472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy with tubes to prevent undesired fusion: a long-term follow-up study.
Dunn C; Moore J; Sahai N; Issa K; Faloon M; Sinha K; Hwang KS; Emami A
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Oct; 29(4):358-364. PubMed ID: 29957145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally Invasive Full-Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy Assisted by O-Arm-Based Navigation.
Zhang C; Wu J; Xu C; Zheng W; Pan Y; Li C; Zhou Y
Pain Physician; 2018 May; 21(3):E215-E223. PubMed ID: 29871377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally Invasive Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy as an Alternative to Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Unilateral Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Sahai N; Changoor S; Dunn CJ; Sinha K; Hwang KS; Faloon M; Emami A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Dec; 44(24):1731-1739. PubMed ID: 31343619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term patient outcomes after posterior cervical foraminotomy: an analysis of 151 cases.
Bydon M; Mathios D; Macki M; de la Garza-Ramos R; Sciubba DM; Witham TF; Wolinsky JP; Gokaslan ZL; Bydon A
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Nov; 21(5):727-31. PubMed ID: 25127430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy Via Full-Endoscopic Versus Microendoscopic Approach for Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Wu PF; Li YW; Wang B; Jiang B; Tu ZM; Lv GH
Pain Physician; 2019 Jan; 22(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 30700067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing Mid-Term Outcomes Between ACDF and Minimally Invasive Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy in the Treatment of Cervical Radiculopathy.
Emami A; Coban D; Changoor S; Dunn C; Sahai N; Sinha K; Hwang KS; Faloon M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2022 Feb; 47(4):324-330. PubMed ID: 34107527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surgical Treatment of Single Level Cervical Radiculopathy: A Comparison of Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion (ACDF) Versus Cervical Disk Arthroplasty (CDA) Versus Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy (PCF).
Padhye K; Shultz P; Alcala C; Mehbod A; Garvey T; Schwender J; Dawson JM; Transfeldt E
Clin Spine Surg; 2022 May; 35(4):149-154. PubMed ID: 35351839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy for patients with cervical radiculopathy: a cost analysis.
Mansfield HE; Canar WJ; Gerard CS; O'Toole JE
Neurosurg Focus; 2014 Nov; 37(5):E9. PubMed ID: 25491887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-Utility Analysis of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With Plating (ACDFP) Versus Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy (PCF) for Patients With Single-level Cervical Radiculopathy at 1-Year Follow-up.
Alvin MD; Lubelski D; Abdullah KG; Whitmore RG; Benzel EC; Mroz TE
Clin Spine Surg; 2016 Mar; 29(2):E67-72. PubMed ID: 26889994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimally invasive 2-level posterior cervical foraminotomy: preliminary clinical results.
Holly LT; Moftakhar P; Khoo LT; Wang JC; Shamie N
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Feb; 20(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 17285047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Complications of Full-Endoscopic Versus Microendoscopic Foraminotomy for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Wu PF; Liu BH; Wang B; Li YW; Dai YL; Qing YL; Lv GH
World Neurosurg; 2018 Jun; 114():217-227. PubMed ID: 29602008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A meta-analysis of cervical foraminotomy: open versus minimally-invasive techniques.
McAnany SJ; Kim JS; Overley SC; Baird EO; Anderson PA; Qureshi SA
Spine J; 2015 May; 15(5):849-56. PubMed ID: 25623079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally invasive foraminotomy through tubular retractors via a contralateral approach in patients with unilateral radiculopathy.
Alimi M; Njoku I; Cong GT; Pyo SY; Hofstetter CP; Grunert P; Härtl R
Neurosurgery; 2014 Sep; 10 Suppl 3():436-47; discussion 446-7. PubMed ID: 24681643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Minimally invasive posterior cervical discectomy for cervical radiculopathy: technique and clinical results.
Lidar Z; Salame K
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Dec; 24(8):521-4. PubMed ID: 21430573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effective cervical decompression by the posterior cervical foraminotomy without discectomy.
Kang MS; Choi KC; Lee CD; Shin YH; Hur SM; Lee SH
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Jul; 27(5):271-6. PubMed ID: 23897055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical radiculopathy: a meta-analysis.
Zou T; Wang PC; Chen H; Feng XM; Sun HH
Neurosurg Rev; 2022 Dec; 45(6):3609-3618. PubMed ID: 36255547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Limitations of minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy-a decompression method of posteriorly shifting the nerve root-in cases of large anterior osteophytes in cervical radiculopathy: A retrospective multicenter cohort study.
Oshina M; Tani S; Yamada T; Ohe T; Iwai H; Oshima Y; Inanami H
J Orthop Sci; 2023 Jul; 28(4):758-764. PubMed ID: 35817666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of clinical outcomes in anterior cervical discectomy versus foraminotomy for brachialgia.
Foster MT; Carleton-Bland NP; Lee MK; Jackson R; Clark SR; Wilby MJ
Br J Neurosurg; 2019 Feb; 33(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 30450995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
