152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28234858)
1. Traditional Methods versus Quantitative Sensory Testing of the Feet at Risk: Results from the Rotterdam Diabetic Foot Study.
Rinkel WD; Castro Cabezas M; Setyo JH; Van Neck JW; Coert JH
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Mar; 139(3):752e-763e. PubMed ID: 28234858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Testing for loss of protective sensation in patients with foot ulceration: a cross-sectional study.
Wood WA; Wood MA; Werter SA; Menn JJ; Hamilton SA; Jacoby R; Dellon AL
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2005; 95(5):469-74. PubMed ID: 16166466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sensory thresholds of normal human feet.
Jeng C; Michelson J; Mizel M
Foot Ankle Int; 2000 Jun; 21(6):501-4. PubMed ID: 10884110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development of grading scales of pedal sensory loss using Mokken scale analysis on the Rotterdam Diabetic Foot Study Test Battery data.
Rinkel WD; Aziz MH; Van Neck JW; Cabezas MC; van der Ark LA; Coert JH
Muscle Nerve; 2019 Nov; 60(5):520-527. PubMed ID: 31281987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitation of breast sensibility following reduction mammaplasty: a comparison of inferior and medial pedicle techniques.
Mofid MM; Dellon AL; Elias JJ; Nahabedian MY
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Jun; 109(7):2283-8. PubMed ID: 12045551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computer-assisted measurement in diabetic patients with and without foot ulceration.
Tassler PL; Dellon AL; Scheffler NM
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 1995 Nov; 85(11):679-84. PubMed ID: 8537899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of Cutaneous Spatial Resolution and Pressure Threshold Secondary to Digital Nerve Repair.
Klein HJ; Fakin RM; Ducommun P; Giesen T; Giovanoli P; Calcagni M
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Apr; 137(4):1203-1212. PubMed ID: 27018675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Item reduction of the 39-item Rotterdam Diabetic Foot Study Test Battery using decision tree modelling.
Rinkel WD; van der Oest MJW; Coert JH
Diabetes Metab Res Rev; 2020 May; 36(4):e3291. PubMed ID: 31955486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Grading the loss of sensation in diabetic patients: A psychometric evaluation of the rotterdam diabetic foot study test battery.
Rinkel WD; Rizopoulos D; Aziz MH; Van Neck JW; Cabezas MC; Coert JH
Muscle Nerve; 2018 Oct; 58(4):559-565. PubMed ID: 30028522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Semmes-Weinstein monofilament as a potential predictor of foot ulceration in patients with noninsulin-dependent diabetes.
Olmos PR; Cataland S; O'Dorisio TM; Casey CA; Smead WL; Simon SR
Am J Med Sci; 1995 Feb; 309(2):76-82. PubMed ID: 7847445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Possible sources of discrepancies in the use of the Semmes-Weinstein monofilament. Impact on prevalence of insensate foot and workload requirements.
McGill M; Molyneaux L; Spencer R; Heng LF; Yue DK
Diabetes Care; 1999 Apr; 22(4):598-602. PubMed ID: 10189538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pilot study on the significance of random intrasite placement of the Semmes-Weinstein monofilament.
Slater RA; Koren S; Ramot Y; Buchs A; Rapoport MJ
Diabetes Metab Res Rev; 2013 Mar; 29(3):235-8. PubMed ID: 23283830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Screening patients at risk for diabetic foot ulceration: a comparison between measurement of vibration perception threshold and 10-g monofilament test.
Richard JL; Reilhes L; Buvry S; Goletto M; Faillie JL
Int Wound J; 2014 Apr; 11(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 22892021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Cutaneous sensibility threshold in the feet of diabetic patients with pressure specified sensory device: an assessment of the neuropathy].
Carvalho VF; Ferreira MC; Vieira SA; Ueda T
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2009; 55(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 19360274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Choosing a practical screening instrument to identify patients at risk for diabetic foot ulceration.
Armstrong DG; Lavery LA; Vela SA; Quebedeaux TL; Fleischli JG
Arch Intern Med; 1998 Feb; 158(3):289-92. PubMed ID: 9472210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Peripheral neuropathy in the hands of diabetic patients with lower extremity amputations.
Pinzur MS; Labore A; Bednar M
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2001 Feb; 30(2):121-4. PubMed ID: 11234938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 4.5-gram monofilament sensation beneath both first metatarsal heads indicates protective foot sensation in diabetic patients.
Saltzman CL; Rashid R; Hayes A; Fellner C; Fitzpatrick D; Klapach A; Frantz R; Hillis SL
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Apr; 86(4):717-23. PubMed ID: 15069135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of donor and recipient site sensation in free tissue reconstruction of the oral cavity.
Cordeiro PG; Schwartz M; Neves RI; Tuma R
Ann Plast Surg; 1997 Nov; 39(5):461-8. PubMed ID: 9374141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical examination for the detection of protective sensation in the feet of diabetic patients. International Cooperative Group for Clinical Examination Research.
Smieja M; Hunt DL; Edelman D; Etchells E; Cornuz J; Simel DL
J Gen Intern Med; 1999 Jul; 14(7):418-24. PubMed ID: 10417599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of neurosensory devices in detecting cutaneous thresholds related to protective sensibility: A cross-sectional study in São Paulo, Brazil.
Carvalho VF; Ueda T; Paggiaro AO; Nascimento ARF; Ferreira MC; Gemperli R
Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2019 Nov; 157():107821. PubMed ID: 31437560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
