These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28234979)
1. Assessment of laboratory and daily energy expenditure estimates from consumer multi-sensor physical activity monitors. Chowdhury EA; Western MJ; Nightingale TE; Peacock OJ; Thompson D PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171720. PubMed ID: 28234979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of four Fitbit and Jawbone activity monitors with a research-grade ActiGraph accelerometer for estimating physical activity and energy expenditure. Imboden MT; Nelson MB; Kaminsky LA; Montoye AH Br J Sports Med; 2018 Jul; 52(13):844-850. PubMed ID: 28483930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of consumer monitors for estimating energy expenditure in youth. LaMunion SR; Blythe AL; Hibbing PR; Kaplan AS; Clendenin BJ; Crouter SE Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2020 Feb; 45(2):161-168. PubMed ID: 31269409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of Consumer Wearable Heart Rate Measurement During an Ecologically Valid 24-Hour Period: Intraindividual Validation Study. Nelson BW; Allen NB JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Mar; 7(3):e10828. PubMed ID: 30855232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimating Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in a Free-Living Context: A Pragmatic Comparison of Consumer-Based Activity Trackers and ActiGraph Accelerometry. Gomersall SR; Ng N; Burton NW; Pavey TG; Gilson ND; Brown WJ J Med Internet Res; 2016 Sep; 18(9):e239. PubMed ID: 27604226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The validity of consumer-level, activity monitors in healthy adults worn in free-living conditions: a cross-sectional study. Ferguson T; Rowlands AV; Olds T; Maher C Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2015 Mar; 12():42. PubMed ID: 25890168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How well do activity monitors estimate energy expenditure? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the validity of current technologies. O'Driscoll R; Turicchi J; Beaulieu K; Scott S; Matu J; Deighton K; Finlayson G; Stubbs J Br J Sports Med; 2020 Mar; 54(6):332-340. PubMed ID: 30194221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers in Laboratory and Free-Living Settings for Patients With Chronic Pain: Criterion Validity Study. Sjöberg V; Westergren J; Monnier A; Lo Martire R; Hagströmer M; Äng BO; Vixner L JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Jan; 9(1):e24806. PubMed ID: 33433391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of the Fitbit One, Garmin Vivofit and Jawbone UP activity tracker in estimation of energy expenditure during treadmill walking and running. Price K; Bird SR; Lythgo N; Raj IS; Wong JY; Lynch C J Med Eng Technol; 2017 Apr; 41(3):208-215. PubMed ID: 27919170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comprehensive comparison of Apple Watch and Fitbit monitors in a free-living setting. Bai Y; Tompkins C; Gell N; Dione D; Zhang T; Byun W PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251975. PubMed ID: 34038458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of the Multisensory Wristwatch Polar Vantage's Estimation of Energy Expenditure in Various Activities: Instrument Validation Study. Gilgen-Ammann R; Schweizer T; Wyss T JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Oct; 7(10):e14534. PubMed ID: 31579020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validity of consumer-based physical activity monitors. Lee JM; Kim Y; Welk GJ Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2014 Sep; 46(9):1840-8. PubMed ID: 24777201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Wrist-worn devices for the measurement of heart rate and energy expenditure: A validation study for the Apple Watch 6, Polar Vantage V and Fitbit Sense. Hajj-Boutros G; Landry-Duval MA; Comtois AS; Gouspillou G; Karelis AD Eur J Sport Sci; 2023 Feb; 23(2):165-177. PubMed ID: 34957939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of activity trackers to estimate energy expenditure in older adults with cardiovascular risk factors. Rieckmann A; Jordan B; Burczik F; Meixner J; Thiel C PLoS One; 2024; 19(8):e0309481. PubMed ID: 39190715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validity Evaluation of the Fitbit Charge2 and the Garmin vivosmart HR+ in Free-Living Environments in an Older Adult Cohort. Tedesco S; Sica M; Ancillao A; Timmons S; Barton J; O'Flynn B JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Jun; 7(6):e13084. PubMed ID: 31219048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Agreement between the Apple Series 1, LifeTrak Core C200, and Fitbit Charge HR with Indirect Calorimetry for Assessing Treadmill Energy Expenditure. Zhang P; Burns RD; Fu Y; Godin S; Byun W Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Oct; 16(20):. PubMed ID: 31658628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of the Apple Watch for Estimating Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity and Activity Energy Expenditure in School-Aged Children. Kwon S; Kim Y; Bai Y; Burns RD; Brusseau TA; Byun W Sensors (Basel); 2021 Sep; 21(19):. PubMed ID: 34640733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Consumer and Research Monitors under Semistructured Settings. Bai Y; Welk GJ; Nam YH; Lee JA; Lee JM; Kim Y; Meier NF; Dixon PM Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 Jan; 48(1):151-8. PubMed ID: 26154336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers. Evenson KR; Goto MM; Furberg RD Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2015 Dec; 12():159. PubMed ID: 26684758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validity of Consumer-Based Physical Activity Monitors for Specific Activity Types. Nelson MB; Kaminsky LA; Dickin DC; Montoye AH Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 Aug; 48(8):1619-28. PubMed ID: 27015387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]