174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28235046)
1. Community recommendations on biobank governance: Results from a deliberative community engagement in California.
Dry SM; Garrett SB; Koenig BA; Brown AF; Burgess MM; Hult JR; Longstaff H; Wilcox ES; Madrigal Contreras SK; Martinez A; Boyd EA; Dohan D
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172582. PubMed ID: 28235046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. EngageUC: Developing an Efficient and Ethical Approach to Biobanking Research at the University of California.
Garrett SB; Koenig BA; Brown A; Hult JR; Boyd EA; Dry S; Dohan D;
Clin Transl Sci; 2015 Aug; 8(4):362-6. PubMed ID: 25581047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biobanks in the low- and middle-income countries of the Arab Middle East region: challenges, ethical issues, and governance arrangements-a qualitative study involving biobank managers.
Abdelhafiz AS; Ahram M; Ibrahim ME; Elgamri A; Gamel E; Labib R; Silverman H
BMC Med Ethics; 2022 Aug; 23(1):83. PubMed ID: 35965314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Linking Broad Consent to Biobank Governance: Support From a Deliberative Public Engagement in California.
Garrett SB; Dohan D; Koenig BA
Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(9):56-7. PubMed ID: 26305757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Involving Research Stakeholders in Developing Policy on Sharing Public Health Research Data in Kenya: Views on Fair Process for Informed Consent, Access Oversight, and Community Engagement.
Jao I; Kombe F; Mwalukore S; Bull S; Parker M; Kamuya D; Molyneux S; Marsh V
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Jul; 10(3):264-77. PubMed ID: 26297748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Public Attitudes toward Consent and Data Sharing in Biobank Research: A Large Multi-site Experimental Survey in the US.
Sanderson SC; Brothers KB; Mercaldo ND; Clayton EW; Antommaria AHM; Aufox SA; Brilliant MH; Campos D; Carrell DS; Connolly J; Conway P; Fullerton SM; Garrison NA; Horowitz CR; Jarvik GP; Kaufman D; Kitchner TE; Li R; Ludman EJ; McCarty CA; McCormick JB; McManus VD; Myers MF; Scrol A; Williams JL; Shrubsole MJ; Schildcrout JS; Smith ME; Holm IA
Am J Hum Genet; 2017 Mar; 100(3):414-427. PubMed ID: 28190457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
American Society of Clinical Oncology
J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. From 'trust us' to participatory governance: Deliberative publics and science policy.
Burgess MM
Public Underst Sci; 2014 Jan; 23(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 24434712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Consent and research governance in biobanks: evidence from focus groups with medical researchers.
Whitley EA; Kanellopoulou N; Kaye J
Public Health Genomics; 2012; 15(5):232-42. PubMed ID: 22722687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Parents' attitudes toward consent and data sharing in biobanks: A multisite experimental survey.
Antommaria AHM; Brothers KB; Myers JA; Feygin YB; Aufox SA; Brilliant MH; Conway P; Fullerton SM; Garrison NA; Horowitz CR; Jarvik GP; Li R; Ludman EJ; McCarty CA; McCormick JB; Mercaldo ND; Myers MF; Sanderson SC; Shrubsole MJ; Schildcrout JS; Williams JL; Smith ME; Clayton EW; Holm IA
AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2018; 9(3):128-142. PubMed ID: 30240342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. "It's all about trust": reflections of researchers on the complexity and controversy surrounding biobanking in South Africa.
Moodley K; Singh S
BMC Med Ethics; 2016 Oct; 17(1):57. PubMed ID: 27724893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A solidarity-based approach to the governance of research biobanks.
Prainsack B; Buyx A
Med Law Rev; 2013; 21(1):71-91. PubMed ID: 23325780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biobank participation and returning research results: perspectives from a deliberative engagement in South Side Chicago.
Lemke AA; Halverson C; Ross LF
Am J Med Genet A; 2012 May; 158A(5):1029-37. PubMed ID: 22438108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Practice evaluation of biobank ethics and governance: current needs and future perspectives.
Langhof H; Schwietering J; Strech D
J Med Genet; 2019 Mar; 56(3):176-185. PubMed ID: 30464052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biorepository regulatory frameworks: building parallel resources that both promote scientific investigation and protect human subjects.
Marko-Varga G; Baker MS; Boja ES; Rodriguez H; Fehniger TE
J Proteome Res; 2014 Dec; 13(12):5319-24. PubMed ID: 25277501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Informed consent for biobanking research: cancer patient recruitment from rural communities in Maine.
Morrison DG; Farah C; Hock JM
Biopreserv Biobank; 2013 Apr; 11(2):107-14. PubMed ID: 24845431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stakeholder perspectives on the ethico-legal dimensions of biobanking in South Africa.
Singh S; Moodley K
BMC Med Ethics; 2021 Jul; 22(1):84. PubMed ID: 34210291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Engaging the public on biobanks: outcomes of the BC biobank deliberation.
O'Doherty KC; Burgess MM
Public Health Genomics; 2009; 12(4):203-15. PubMed ID: 19367089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Future-proofing biobanks' governance.
Gille F; Vayena E; Blasimme A
Eur J Hum Genet; 2020 Aug; 28(8):989-996. PubMed ID: 32424324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
