201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28235549)
1. Clinical Outcome Following Low Suspicion Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging or Benign Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Biopsy to Detect Prostate Cancer.
Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Thomsen HS
J Urol; 2017 Aug; 198(2):310-315. PubMed ID: 28235549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Value of PSA Density in Combination with PI-RADS™ for the Accuracy of Prostate Cancer Prediction.
Distler FA; Radtke JP; Bonekamp D; Kesch C; Schlemmer HP; Wieczorek K; Kirchner M; Pahernik S; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
J Urol; 2017 Sep; 198(3):575-582. PubMed ID: 28373135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prebiopsy Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined with Prostate-specific Antigen Density in Detecting and Ruling out Gleason 7-10 Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-naïve Men.
Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Bisbjerg R; Thestrup KC; Jakobsen H; Thomsen HS
Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 May; 2(3):311-319. PubMed ID: 31200846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative analysis of transperineal template saturation prostate biopsy versus magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy with magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion guidance.
Radtke JP; Kuru TH; Boxler S; Alt CD; Popeneciu IV; Huettenbrink C; Klein T; Steinemann S; Bergstraesser C; Roethke M; Roth W; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
J Urol; 2015 Jan; 193(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 25079939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Negative Predictive Value of Prostate Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging among Men with Negative Prostate Biopsy and Elevated Prostate Specific Antigen: A Clinical Outcome Retrospective Cohort Study.
Lo G; Burton KR; Haider MA; Fleshner N; Finelli A; Ghai S
J Urol; 2019 Dec; 202(6):1159-1165. PubMed ID: 31188731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Natural History of Pathologically Benign Cancer Suspicious Regions on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Following Targeted Biopsy.
Bryk DJ; Llukani E; Huang WC; Lepor H
J Urol; 2015 Nov; 194(5):1234-40. PubMed ID: 26003206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Negative Prebiopsy Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Risk of Significant Prostate Cancer: Baseline and Long-Term Followup Results.
Buisset J; Norris JM; Puech P; Leroy X; Ramdane N; Drumez E; Villers A; Olivier J
J Urol; 2021 Mar; 205(3):725-731. PubMed ID: 33080153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Efficacy of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy in Risk Classification for Patients with Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance.
Recabal P; Assel M; Sjoberg DD; Lee D; Laudone VP; Touijer K; Eastham JA; Vargas HA; Coleman J; Ehdaie B
J Urol; 2016 Aug; 196(2):374-81. PubMed ID: 26920465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naive Men: The Biparametric MRI for Detection of Prostate Cancer (BIDOC) Study.
Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Bisbjerg R; Thestrup KC; Winther MD; Jakobsen H; Thomsen HS
JAMA Netw Open; 2018 Jun; 1(2):e180219. PubMed ID: 30646066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk of Prostate Cancer after a Negative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Biopsy.
Kinnaird A; Sharma V; Chuang R; Priester A; Tran E; Barsa DE; Delfin M; Kwan L; Sisk A; Felker E; Marks LS
J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1180-1186. PubMed ID: 32614257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Value of 3-Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and targeted biopsy for improved risk stratification in patients considered for active surveillance.
Pessoa RR; Viana PC; Mattedi RL; Guglielmetti GB; Cordeiro MD; Coelho RF; Nahas WC; Srougi M
BJU Int; 2017 Apr; 119(4):535-542. PubMed ID: 27500389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of prostate-specific antigen density on positive and negative predictive values of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to detect Gleason score 7-10 prostate cancer in a repeat biopsy setting.
Hansen NL; Barrett T; Koo B; Doble A; Gnanapragasam V; Warren A; Kastner C; Bratt O
BJU Int; 2017 May; 119(5):724-730. PubMed ID: 27488931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Prospective Comparison of Selective Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion-Targeted and Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsies for Detecting Prostate Cancer in Men Undergoing Repeated Biopsies.
Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Thomsen HS
Urol Int; 2017; 99(4):384-391. PubMed ID: 28651247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Utility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging suspicion levels for detecting prostate cancer.
Rais-Bahrami S; Siddiqui MM; Turkbey B; Stamatakis L; Logan J; Hoang AN; Walton-Diaz A; Vourganti S; Truong H; Kruecker J; Merino MJ; Wood BJ; Choyke PL; Pinto PA
J Urol; 2013 Nov; 190(5):1721-1727. PubMed ID: 23727310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Magnetic resonance imaging guided prostate biopsy in men with repeat negative biopsies and increased prostate specific antigen.
Hambrock T; Somford DM; Hoeks C; Bouwense SA; Huisman H; Yakar D; van Oort IM; Witjes JA; Fütterer JJ; Barentsz JO
J Urol; 2010 Feb; 183(2):520-7. PubMed ID: 20006859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy in Detection of Prostate Cancer Harboring Adverse Pathological Features of Intraductal Carcinoma and Invasive Cribriform Carcinoma.
Prendeville S; Gertner M; Maganti M; Pintilie M; Perlis N; Toi A; Evans AJ; Finelli A; van der Kwast TH; Ghai S
J Urol; 2018 Jul; 200(1):104-113. PubMed ID: 29408568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Role of Systematic and Targeted Biopsies in Light of Overlap on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy.
Patel N; Cricco-Lizza E; Kasabwala K; Xu C; Robinson BD; Khani F; Wang Y; Margolis D; Hu JC
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Sep; 1(4):263-267. PubMed ID: 31100246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of histological findings obtained combining US/mp-MRI fusion-guided biopsies with systematic US biopsies: mp-MRI role in prostate cancer detection and false negative.
Faiella E; Santucci D; Greco F; Frauenfelder G; Giacobbe V; Muto G; Zobel BB; Grasso RF
Radiol Med; 2018 Feb; 123(2):143-152. PubMed ID: 29019021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer.
Kuru TH; Roethke MC; Seidenader J; Simpfendörfer T; Boxler S; Alammar K; Rieker P; Popeneciu VI; Roth W; Pahernik S; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4):1380-6. PubMed ID: 23608676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging guided in-bore prostate biopsy versus systematic transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in biopsy naïve men with elevated prostate specific antigen.
Quentin M; Blondin D; Arsov C; Schimmöller L; Hiester A; Godehardt E; Albers P; Antoch G; Rabenalt R
J Urol; 2014 Nov; 192(5):1374-9. PubMed ID: 24866597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
