These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28235549)

  • 1. Clinical Outcome Following Low Suspicion Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging or Benign Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Biopsy to Detect Prostate Cancer.
    Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Thomsen HS
    J Urol; 2017 Aug; 198(2):310-315. PubMed ID: 28235549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Value of PSA Density in Combination with PI-RADS™ for the Accuracy of Prostate Cancer Prediction.
    Distler FA; Radtke JP; Bonekamp D; Kesch C; Schlemmer HP; Wieczorek K; Kirchner M; Pahernik S; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
    J Urol; 2017 Sep; 198(3):575-582. PubMed ID: 28373135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prebiopsy Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined with Prostate-specific Antigen Density in Detecting and Ruling out Gleason 7-10 Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-naïve Men.
    Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Bisbjerg R; Thestrup KC; Jakobsen H; Thomsen HS
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 May; 2(3):311-319. PubMed ID: 31200846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative analysis of transperineal template saturation prostate biopsy versus magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy with magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion guidance.
    Radtke JP; Kuru TH; Boxler S; Alt CD; Popeneciu IV; Huettenbrink C; Klein T; Steinemann S; Bergstraesser C; Roethke M; Roth W; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
    J Urol; 2015 Jan; 193(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 25079939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Negative Predictive Value of Prostate Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging among Men with Negative Prostate Biopsy and Elevated Prostate Specific Antigen: A Clinical Outcome Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Lo G; Burton KR; Haider MA; Fleshner N; Finelli A; Ghai S
    J Urol; 2019 Dec; 202(6):1159-1165. PubMed ID: 31188731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Natural History of Pathologically Benign Cancer Suspicious Regions on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Following Targeted Biopsy.
    Bryk DJ; Llukani E; Huang WC; Lepor H
    J Urol; 2015 Nov; 194(5):1234-40. PubMed ID: 26003206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Negative Prebiopsy Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Risk of Significant Prostate Cancer: Baseline and Long-Term Followup Results.
    Buisset J; Norris JM; Puech P; Leroy X; Ramdane N; Drumez E; Villers A; Olivier J
    J Urol; 2021 Mar; 205(3):725-731. PubMed ID: 33080153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Efficacy of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy in Risk Classification for Patients with Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance.
    Recabal P; Assel M; Sjoberg DD; Lee D; Laudone VP; Touijer K; Eastham JA; Vargas HA; Coleman J; Ehdaie B
    J Urol; 2016 Aug; 196(2):374-81. PubMed ID: 26920465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naive Men: The Biparametric MRI for Detection of Prostate Cancer (BIDOC) Study.
    Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Bisbjerg R; Thestrup KC; Winther MD; Jakobsen H; Thomsen HS
    JAMA Netw Open; 2018 Jun; 1(2):e180219. PubMed ID: 30646066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk of Prostate Cancer after a Negative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Biopsy.
    Kinnaird A; Sharma V; Chuang R; Priester A; Tran E; Barsa DE; Delfin M; Kwan L; Sisk A; Felker E; Marks LS
    J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1180-1186. PubMed ID: 32614257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Value of 3-Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and targeted biopsy for improved risk stratification in patients considered for active surveillance.
    Pessoa RR; Viana PC; Mattedi RL; Guglielmetti GB; Cordeiro MD; Coelho RF; Nahas WC; Srougi M
    BJU Int; 2017 Apr; 119(4):535-542. PubMed ID: 27500389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of prostate-specific antigen density on positive and negative predictive values of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to detect Gleason score 7-10 prostate cancer in a repeat biopsy setting.
    Hansen NL; Barrett T; Koo B; Doble A; Gnanapragasam V; Warren A; Kastner C; Bratt O
    BJU Int; 2017 May; 119(5):724-730. PubMed ID: 27488931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Prospective Comparison of Selective Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion-Targeted and Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsies for Detecting Prostate Cancer in Men Undergoing Repeated Biopsies.
    Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Thomsen HS
    Urol Int; 2017; 99(4):384-391. PubMed ID: 28651247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Utility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging suspicion levels for detecting prostate cancer.
    Rais-Bahrami S; Siddiqui MM; Turkbey B; Stamatakis L; Logan J; Hoang AN; Walton-Diaz A; Vourganti S; Truong H; Kruecker J; Merino MJ; Wood BJ; Choyke PL; Pinto PA
    J Urol; 2013 Nov; 190(5):1721-1727. PubMed ID: 23727310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Magnetic resonance imaging guided prostate biopsy in men with repeat negative biopsies and increased prostate specific antigen.
    Hambrock T; Somford DM; Hoeks C; Bouwense SA; Huisman H; Yakar D; van Oort IM; Witjes JA; Fütterer JJ; Barentsz JO
    J Urol; 2010 Feb; 183(2):520-7. PubMed ID: 20006859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy in Detection of Prostate Cancer Harboring Adverse Pathological Features of Intraductal Carcinoma and Invasive Cribriform Carcinoma.
    Prendeville S; Gertner M; Maganti M; Pintilie M; Perlis N; Toi A; Evans AJ; Finelli A; van der Kwast TH; Ghai S
    J Urol; 2018 Jul; 200(1):104-113. PubMed ID: 29408568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Role of Systematic and Targeted Biopsies in Light of Overlap on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy.
    Patel N; Cricco-Lizza E; Kasabwala K; Xu C; Robinson BD; Khani F; Wang Y; Margolis D; Hu JC
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Sep; 1(4):263-267. PubMed ID: 31100246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of histological findings obtained combining US/mp-MRI fusion-guided biopsies with systematic US biopsies: mp-MRI role in prostate cancer detection and false negative.
    Faiella E; Santucci D; Greco F; Frauenfelder G; Giacobbe V; Muto G; Zobel BB; Grasso RF
    Radiol Med; 2018 Feb; 123(2):143-152. PubMed ID: 29019021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer.
    Kuru TH; Roethke MC; Seidenader J; Simpfendörfer T; Boxler S; Alammar K; Rieker P; Popeneciu VI; Roth W; Pahernik S; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
    J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4):1380-6. PubMed ID: 23608676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging guided in-bore prostate biopsy versus systematic transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy in biopsy naïve men with elevated prostate specific antigen.
    Quentin M; Blondin D; Arsov C; Schimmöller L; Hiester A; Godehardt E; Albers P; Antoch G; Rabenalt R
    J Urol; 2014 Nov; 192(5):1374-9. PubMed ID: 24866597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.