These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
25. Heightened conflict in cue-target translation increases backward inhibition in set switching. Grange JA; Houghton G J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):1003-9. PubMed ID: 20565215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Investigating task inhibition in children versus adults: A diffusion model analysis. Schuch S; Konrad K J Exp Child Psychol; 2017 Apr; 156():143-167. PubMed ID: 28068551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Temporal cue-target overlap is not essential for backward inhibition in task switching. Grange JA; Houghton G Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Oct; 62(10):2068-79. PubMed ID: 19225989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effects of global and local task repetition proportion on n - 2 repetition costs. Scheil J; Kleinsorge T Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Mar; 72(3):579-588. PubMed ID: 29431022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. On costs and benefits of n-2 repetitions in task switching: towards a behavioural marker of cognitive inhibition. Grange JA; Juvina I; Houghton G Psychol Res; 2013 Mar; 77(2):211-22. PubMed ID: 22327120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The effect of episodic retrieval on inhibition in task switching. Grange JA; Kowalczyk AW; O'Loughlin R J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1568-1583. PubMed ID: 28383961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Can time-based decay explain temporal distinctiveness effects in task switching? Grange JA; Cross E Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(1):19-45. PubMed ID: 25028178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Does Task Activation in Task Switching Influence Inhibition or Episodic Interference? Grange JA Exp Psychol; 2018 Nov; 65(6):393-404. PubMed ID: 30638164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The role of cue-target translation in backward inhibition of attentional set. Houghton G; Pritchard R; Grange JA J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):466-76. PubMed ID: 19271859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Further investigating effects of task repetition proportion on Scheil J; Kleinsorge T Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Oct; 73(10):1629-1639. PubMed ID: 32238035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Task cues lead to item-level backward inhibition with univalent stimuli and responses. Prosser LJ; Jackson MC; Swainson R Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Mar; 73(3):442-457. PubMed ID: 31590604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Response selection and response execution in task switching: evidence from a go-signal paradigm. Philipp AM; Jolicoeur P; Falkenstein M; Koch I J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):1062-75. PubMed ID: 17983313 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Distinguishing between inhibitory and episodic processing accounts of switch-cost asymmetries. Wong J; Leboe JP Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Mar; 63(1):8-23. PubMed ID: 19271811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The impact of stimulus format on task inhibition during task switching. Sdoia S; Zivi P; Ferlazzo F Psychol Res; 2022 Oct; 86(7):2185-2194. PubMed ID: 35015110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]