147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28236038)
1. Suburethral sling procedures in the United States: complications, readmission, and reoperation.
Propst K; O'Sullivan DM; Tulikangas PK
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Oct; 28(10):1463-1467. PubMed ID: 28236038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Readmission and reoperation after midurethral sling.
Hokenstad ED; Glasgow AE; Habermann EB; Occhino JA
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Sep; 29(9):1367-1370. PubMed ID: 29327120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surgeon volume and reoperation risk after midurethral sling surgery.
Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Nov; 221(5):523.e1-523.e8. PubMed ID: 31526790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of concomitant mid-urethral sling surgery on patients undergoing vaginal prolapse repair.
Malacarne Pape D; Escobar CM; Agrawal S; Rosenblum N; Brucker B
Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Mar; 32(3):681-685. PubMed ID: 33048178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Thirty-day readmission and reoperation after surgery for spinal tumors: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis.
Karhade AV; Vasudeva VS; Dasenbrock HH; Lu Y; Gormley WB; Groff MW; Chi JH; Smith TR
Neurosurg Focus; 2016 Aug; 41(2):E5. PubMed ID: 27476847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 30-Day Morbidity and Reoperation Following Midurethral Sling: Analysis of 8772 Cases Using a National Prospective Database.
Cohen AJ; Packiam VT; Nottingham CU; Alberts BD; Faris SF; Bales GT
Urology; 2016 Sep; 95():72-9. PubMed ID: 27196030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Low Serum Albumin Correlates With Adverse Events Following Surgery for Male Urinary Incontinence: Analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project.
Ginsburg KB; Schwabe JR; Cochrane JA; Tapper A; Burks F; Rambhatla A
Urology; 2020 Mar; 137():178-182. PubMed ID: 31866523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Postoperative Admission, Readmission, and Complications for Patients 60 Years and Older Who Are Undergoing an Isolated Sling Procedure for Stress Incontinence: A Database Study.
Winkelman WD; Jaresova A; Modest AM; Richardson ML
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Jun; 27(6):e542-e548. PubMed ID: 33208653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of body mass index on short-term subjective improvement and risk of reoperation after mid-urethral sling surgery.
Weltz V; Guldberg R; Larsen MD; Magnussen B; Lose G
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Apr; 29(4):585-591. PubMed ID: 29435604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rates of Sling Procedures and Revisions-A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database Study.
Bretschneider CE; Geynisman-Tan J; Mueller MG; Collins SA; Lewicky-Gaupp C; Kenton K
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Jun; 27(6):e559-e562. PubMed ID: 33315624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of complication rates related to male urethral slings and artificial urinary sphincters for urinary incontinence: national multi-institutional analysis of ACS-NSQIP database.
Alwaal A; Harris CR; Awad MA; Allen IE; Breyer BN
Int Urol Nephrol; 2016 Oct; 48(10):1571-6. PubMed ID: 27417131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Readmission and Reoperation After Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Hokenstad ED; Glasgow AE; Habermann EB; Occhino JA
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(2):131-135. PubMed ID: 28067747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predictors of sling revision after mid-urethral sling procedures: a case-control study.
Clancy AA; Gauthier I; Ramirez FD; Hickling D; Pascali D
BJOG; 2019 Feb; 126(3):419-426. PubMed ID: 30220104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Are suburethral slings less successful in the elderly?
Alas A; Chinthakanan O; Espaillat L; Plowright L; Aguilar V; Davila GW
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Apr; 28(4):553-559. PubMed ID: 27629119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sling Procedures for the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence: Comparison of National Practice Patterns between Urologists and Gynecologists.
James MB; Theofanides MC; Sui W; Onyeji I; Badalato GM; Chung DE
J Urol; 2017 Dec; 198(6):1386-1391. PubMed ID: 28684228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk Factors for Urinary Tract Infection following Mid Urethral Sling Surgery.
Vigil HR; Mallick R; Nitti VW; Lavallée LT; Breau RH; Hickling DR
J Urol; 2017 May; 197(5):1268-1273. PubMed ID: 28034608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Impact of Frailty on Outcomes of Sling Surgery with and without Prolapse Repair.
Medendorp AR; Liu H; Kwan L; Suskind AM; Lee UJ; Amin KA; Litwin MS; Anger JT
J Urol; 2021 Aug; 206(2):382-389. PubMed ID: 33793295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Can candidates for reimplantation of suburethral sling after sling removal due to chronic obstruction be identified intraoperatively?].
Mouracade P; Lang H; Jacqmin D; Saussine C
Prog Urol; 2008 Apr; 18(4):238-44. PubMed ID: 18501304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk of repeat anti-incontinence surgery following sling release: a review of 93 cases.
Clifton MM; Linder BJ; Lightner DJ; Elliott DS
J Urol; 2014 Mar; 191(3):710-4. PubMed ID: 24060639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multicentre randomized trial of the Ajust™ single-incision sling compared to the Align™ transobturator tape sling.
Sabadell J; Palau-Gené M; Huguet E; Montero-Armengol A; Salicrú S; Poza JL
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Jul; 28(7):1041-1047. PubMed ID: 27921162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
