145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28236038)
41. Recurrence of Stress Urinary Incontinence After Midurethral Sling Revision: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Shaw J; Wohlrab K; Rardin C
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(3):184-187. PubMed ID: 27748665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Risk factors for postoperative urinary tract infection following midurethral sling procedures.
Doganay M; Cavkaytar S; Kokanali MK; Ozer I; Aksakal OS; Erkaya S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Apr; 211():74-77. PubMed ID: 28192735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. [Analysis of the results of urinary incontinence treatment in women using free suburethral synthetic sling: the experience of 1000 operations].
Kasian GR; Gvozdev MIu; Godunov BN; Prokopovich MA; Pushkar' DIu
Urologiia; 2013; (4):5-11. PubMed ID: 24159756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Five years after midurethral sling surgery for stress incontinence: obesity continues to have an impact on outcomes.
Brennand EA; Tang S; Birch C; Murphy M; Ross S; Robert M;
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Apr; 28(4):621-628. PubMed ID: 27686569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes of Autologous Bladder Neck Fascial Slings Based on Fascial Harvest Site: A Secondary Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
Cardenas-Trowers OO; Stewart R; Meriwether KV; Francis S; Gupta A
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2020 Aug; 26(8):526-529. PubMed ID: 31425372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Salvage surgery after failed treatment of synthetic mesh sling complications.
Blaivas JG; Purohit RS; Weinberger JM; Tsui JF; Chouhan J; Sidhu R; Saleem K
J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4):1281-6. PubMed ID: 23523928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The role of provider volume on outcomes after sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence.
Anger JT; Rodríguez LV; Wang Q; Pashos CL; Litwin MS
J Urol; 2007 Apr; 177(4):1457-62; discussion 1462. PubMed ID: 17382752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Trends in reoperation for female stress urinary incontinence: A nationwide study.
Wu MP; Long CY; Liang CC; Weng SF; Tong YC
Neurourol Urodyn; 2015 Sep; 34(7):693-8. PubMed ID: 25067811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Perioperative complications and reoperations after incontinence and prolapse surgeries using prosthetic implants.
Nguyen JN; Jakus-Waldman SM; Walter AJ; White T; Menefee SA
Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Mar; 119(3):539-46. PubMed ID: 22353951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. An analysis of causes of readmission after spine surgery.
McCormack RA; Hunter T; Ramos N; Michels R; Hutzler L; Bosco JA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jun; 37(14):1260-6. PubMed ID: 22699448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Decreasing transobturator sling groin pain without decreasing efficacy using TVT-Abbrevo.
Shaw JS; Jeppson PC; Rardin CR
Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Sep; 26(9):1369-72. PubMed ID: 26032699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Sling location in women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence following midurethral sling.
Gilchrist AS; Rovner ES
Urology; 2012 Jan; 79(1):76-9. PubMed ID: 22014964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Indications and risk factors for midurethral sling revision.
Unger CA; Rizzo AE; Ridgeway B
Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Jan; 27(1):117-22. PubMed ID: 26134541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. A randomized comparison of a single-incision midurethral sling and a transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: results of 12-mo follow-up.
Schellart RP; Oude Rengerink K; Van der Aa F; Lucot JP; Kimpe B; de Ridder DJ; Dijkgraaf MG; Roovers JP
Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1179-85. PubMed ID: 25168619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Thirty-day Morbidity of Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy Is Influenced by Additional Surgical Treatment for Stress Urinary Incontinence.
Boysen WR; Adamsky MA; Cohen AJ; Rodriguez J; Faris SF; Bales GT
Urology; 2017 Nov; 109():82-87. PubMed ID: 28735715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Functional outcomes for surgical revision of synthetic slings performed for voiding dysfunction: a retrospective study.
Agnew G; Dwyer PL; Rosamilia A; Edwards G; Lee JK
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Jul; 163(1):113-6. PubMed ID: 22579029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Results of collagen sling placement following the partial removal of a synthetic midurethral sling.
Hogewoning CR; Elzevier HW; Pelger RC; Hogewoning CJ
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Sep; 134(3):286-9. PubMed ID: 27432535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Protective effect of suburethral slings on postoperative cystocele recurrence after reconstructive pelvic operation.
Goldberg RP; Koduri S; Lobel RW; Culligan PJ; Tomezsko JE; Winkler HA; Sand PK
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Dec; 185(6):1307-12; discussion 1312-3. PubMed ID: 11744901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. [Bladder injury during sling operation in the treatment of SUI--review of literature and case report].
Gałczyński K; Futyma K; Bar K; Rechberger T
Ginekol Pol; 2012 Oct; 83(10):784-8. PubMed ID: 23383566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Readmission and Other Adverse Events after Transsphenoidal Surgery: Prevalence, Timing, and Predictive Factors.
Cote DJ; Dasenbrock HH; Muskens IS; Broekman MLD; Zaidi HA; Dunn IF; Smith TR; Laws ER
J Am Coll Surg; 2017 May; 224(5):971-979. PubMed ID: 28279778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
