These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 282367)

  • 21. [A new osteoblast cell culture system for standardized testing of biomaterials].
    Hendrich C; Geyer M; Scheddin D; Schütze N; Eulert J; Thull R
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1996 Oct; 41(10):278-83. PubMed ID: 9019229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Changes of ciscoelastic behaviour during curing of polyether rubber impression material].
    Inoue K; Hayashi I; Kakigawa H; Sugino Y; Terashita M
    Shika Rikogaku Zasshi; 1976 Jan; 17(37):44-50. PubMed ID: 1063232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Tear strength of hydrocolloid and rubber impression materials (author's transl)].
    Suzuki E; Nomoto S
    Nihon Shika Zairyo Kikai Gakkai Zasshi; 1974 Sep; 31(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 4535438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Effects of electrical stimulus upon L-strain cells. (Part 2)--Response of the cells to alternative current prior to cultivation (author's transl)].
    Maeda T; Kawahara H; Nakamura M; Mise T; Koda Y; Isomura S; Yokota J
    Shika Rikogaku Zasshi; 1977 Oct; 18(44):237-53. PubMed ID: 282369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Rheological studies of the polymerization of elastomeric impression materials. I. Network structure of the set state.
    Cook WD
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1982 Jul; 16(4):315-30. PubMed ID: 7107652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
    Michalakis KX; Bakopoulou A; Hirayama H; Garefis DP; Garefis PD
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [The effect of filler content on properties of polyaddition-type silicone impression material].
    Hosotani M; Katakura N; Kawakami M; Iijima K; Honma H
    Shika Zairyo Kikai; 1990 Mar; 9(2):326-35. PubMed ID: 2135525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Toxicity of L-ascorbic acid to L929 fibroblast cultures: relevance to biocompatibility testing of materials for use in wound management.
    Schmidt RJ; Chung LY; Andrews AM; Turner TD
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 Apr; 27(4):521-30. PubMed ID: 8463353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [The physical properties of silicone impression materials with hydrophilicity and hydrophobicity. Wetting, water absorption, surface structure of dental stone and dimensional change on stone dies].
    Murakami H; Takehana S; Takenaka M; Abe T
    Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi; 1990 Dec; 28(4):1105-14. PubMed ID: 2135145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The wetting of surface-treated silicone impression materials by gypsum mixes containing disinfectants and modifiers.
    Abdelaziz KM; Combe EC; Hodges JS
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Jun; 14(2):104-9. PubMed ID: 16011621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Factors affecting the accuracy of elastometric impression materials.
    Chen SY; Liang WM; Chen FN
    J Dent; 2004 Nov; 32(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 15476954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A microbiological investigation following the disinfection of alginate and addition cured silicone rubber impression materials.
    al-Omari WM; Jones JC; Hart P
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1998 Sep; 6(3):97-101. PubMed ID: 10218013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Some properties of hydrophilic addition-type silicone impression materials].
    Tokushima T; Nagayama K; Tawaragi T; Hashimoto H
    Meikai Daigaku Shigaku Zasshi; 1989; 18(2):205-12. PubMed ID: 2489668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Polysulfide rubber base impression materials, the vulcanization of thiokol by t-butyl hydroperoxide-guanidine catalyst].
    Sakurai H
    Nihon Shika Zairyo Kikai Gakkai Zasshi; 1972 Jun; 27():95-119. PubMed ID: 4506049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Study on rubber-base impression material.
    Fuei HK
    J Osaka Dent Univ; 1969 Oct; 3(2):134-48. PubMed ID: 5287398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Comparative analysis of tissue reaction to acrylic resin materials in studies on Wistar strain rats].
    Sobolewska E
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 1999; 45():253-64. PubMed ID: 10909494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Comparative studies on the accuracy of dental casts obtained from elastic impression materials (author's transl)].
    Hide M
    Shikwa Gakuho; 1974 Oct; 74(10):1423-34. PubMed ID: 4532298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Adhesion of polysulfide rubber impression material to dental metals (author's transl)].
    Kawai T; Iwata T; Nishimoto K; Aida Y; Aoki Y; Yamauchi M; Hasegawa J
    Shika Rikogaku Zasshi; 1982 Jan; 23(61):40-6. PubMed ID: 7042866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Rheological studies of the polymerization of elastomeric impression materials. III. Dynamic stress relaxation modulus.
    Cook WD
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1982 Jul; 16(4):345-57. PubMed ID: 7107654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Influence of surface condition upon the cytotoxicity of copper-gold alloy (in vitro) (author's transl)].
    Kato J
    Shika Rikogaku Zasshi; 1976 May; 17(38):63-78. PubMed ID: 1066408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.