255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28236806)
1. Test-treatment RCTs are susceptible to bias: a review of the methodological quality of randomized trials that evaluate diagnostic tests.
Ferrante di Ruffano L; Dinnes J; Sitch AJ; Hyde C; Deeks JJ
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Feb; 17(1):35. PubMed ID: 28236806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Research waste in diagnostic trials: a methods review evaluating the reporting of test-treatment interventions.
Ferrante di Ruffano L; Dinnes J; Taylor-Phillips S; Davenport C; Hyde C; Deeks JJ
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Feb; 17(1):32. PubMed ID: 28231757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies.
Savović J; Jones H; Altman D; Harris R; Jűni P; Pildal J; Als-Nielsen B; Balk E; Gluud C; Gluud L; Ioannidis J; Schulz K; Beynon R; Welton N; Wood L; Moher D; Deeks J; Sterne J
Health Technol Assess; 2012 Sep; 16(35):1-82. PubMed ID: 22989478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality assessment of reporting of randomization, allocation concealment, and blinding in traditional Chinese medicine RCTs: a review of 3159 RCTs identified from 260 systematic reviews.
He J; Du L; Liu G; Fu J; He X; Yu J; Shang L
Trials; 2011 May; 12():122. PubMed ID: 21569452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The methodological quality of 176,620 randomized controlled trials published between 1966 and 2018 reveals a positive trend but also an urgent need for improvement.
Vinkers CH; Lamberink HJ; Tijdink JK; Heus P; Bouter L; Glasziou P; Moher D; Damen JA; Hooft L; Otte WM
PLoS Biol; 2021 Apr; 19(4):e3001162. PubMed ID: 33872298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Trends in the methodological quality of published randomized controlled trials on antibacterial agents.
Falagas ME; Pitsouni EI; Bliziotis IA
Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2008 Jun; 65(6):942-54. PubMed ID: 18279480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Methodological reporting quality of randomized controlled trials: A survey of seven core journals of orthopaedics from Mainland China over 5 years following the CONSORT statement.
Zhang J; Chen X; Zhu Q; Cui J; Cao L; Su J
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 Nov; 102(7):933-938. PubMed ID: 27514437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is Scientific Medical Literature Related to Endometriosis Treatment Evidence-Based? A Systematic Review on Methodological Quality of Randomized Clinical Trials.
Capraş RD; Urda-Cîmpean AE; Bolboacă SD
Medicina (Kaunas); 2019 Jul; 55(7):. PubMed ID: 31311075
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Systematic evaluation of the methodology of randomized controlled trials of anticoagulation in patients with cancer.
Rada G; Schünemann HJ; Labedi N; El-Hachem P; Kairouz VF; Akl EA
BMC Cancer; 2013 Feb; 13():76. PubMed ID: 23406262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Electronic symptom reporting between patient and provider for improved health care service quality: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. part 2: methodological quality and effects.
Johansen MA; Berntsen GK; Schuster T; Henriksen E; Horsch A
J Med Internet Res; 2012 Oct; 14(5):e126. PubMed ID: 23032363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Methodological review: quality of randomized controlled trials in health literacy.
Brainard J; Wilsher SH; Salter C; Loke YK
BMC Health Serv Res; 2016 Jul; 16():246. PubMed ID: 27402048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Systematic Review of Surgical Randomized Controlled Trials: Part I. Risk of Bias and Outcomes: Common Pitfalls Plastic Surgeons Can Overcome.
Voineskos SH; Coroneos CJ; Ziolkowski NI; Kaur MN; Banfield L; Meade MO; Thoma A; Chung KC; Bhandari M
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Feb; 137(2):696-706. PubMed ID: 26818309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality of reporting internal and external validity data from randomized controlled trials evaluating stents for percutaneous coronary intervention.
Ethgen M; Boutron L; Steg PG; Roy C; Ravaud P
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2009 Apr; 9():24. PubMed ID: 19358717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of methodological quality and outcome measures of acute stroke randomized controlled trials in China in recent 15 years.
He S; Wu S; Zeng Q; Zhang S; Lin S; Zhang C; Cui X; Liu M
J Evid Based Med; 2012 Aug; 5(3):174-82. PubMed ID: 23672224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evolution of poor reporting and inadequate methods over time in 20 920 randomised controlled trials included in Cochrane reviews: research on research study.
Dechartres A; Trinquart L; Atal I; Moher D; Dickersin K; Boutron I; Perrodeau E; Altman DG; Ravaud P
BMJ; 2017 Jun; 357():j2490. PubMed ID: 28596181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Trends and predictors of biomedical research quality, 1990-2015: a meta-research study.
Catillon M
BMJ Open; 2019 Sep; 9(9):e030342. PubMed ID: 31481564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The methodological and reporting quality of randomized controlled trials of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for advanced differentiated thyroid cancer: Meta-research study.
Dedivitis RA; Castro MAF; Boni AMD; Alvares ACB; Tresso AJP; Oliveira AD; Vieira AGDSD; Mendes FA; Rossi GO; Fava GN; Pouza IS; Santana IP; Laino JG; Lima LB; Martimbianco ALC
Head Neck; 2024 Jul; 46(7):1683-1697. PubMed ID: 38344932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do randomized clinical trials with inadequate blinding report enhanced placebo effects for intervention groups and nocebo effects for placebo groups?
Feys F; Bekkering GE; Singh K; Devroey D
Syst Rev; 2014 Feb; 3():14. PubMed ID: 24555576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
