These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28236818)

  • 1. Selecting Sustainability Indicators for Small to Medium Sized Urban Water Systems Using Fuzzy-ELECTRE.
    Chhipi-Shrestha G; Hewage K; Sadiq R
    Water Environ Res; 2017 Mar; 89(3):238-249. PubMed ID: 28236818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Advantages of integrated and sustainability based assessment for metabolism based strategic planning of urban water systems.
    Behzadian K; Kapelan Z
    Sci Total Environ; 2015 Sep; 527-528():220-31. PubMed ID: 25965035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new approach to aid urban water management decision making using trade-off sacrifice modelled by fuzzy logic.
    Lai E; Lundie S; Ashbolt NJ
    Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(8):11-20. PubMed ID: 17978428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Integrated assessment and scenarios simulation of urban water security system in the southwest of China with system dynamics analysis.
    Yin S; Dongjie G; Weici S; Weijun G
    Water Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 76(9-10):2255-2267. PubMed ID: 29144284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An Integrated Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach to Assess Sustainable Urban Development in an Emerging Economy.
    Dang VT; Wang J; Van-Thac Dang W
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Aug; 16(16):. PubMed ID: 31412685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Green Supplier Selection Based on Green Practices Evaluated Using Fuzzy Approaches of TOPSIS and ELECTRE with a Case Study in a Chinese Internet Company.
    Qu G; Zhang Z; Qu W; Xu Z
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 May; 17(9):. PubMed ID: 32392876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Systems analysis for environmental assessment of urban water and wastewater systems.
    Jeppsson U; Hellström D
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(6-7):121-9. PubMed ID: 12380983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating environmental sustainability: an integration of multiple-criteria decision-making and fuzzy logic.
    Liu KF
    Environ Manage; 2007 May; 39(5):721-36. PubMed ID: 17377731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimized plan of centralized and decentralized wastewater reuse systems for housing development in the urban area of Xi'an, China.
    Wang XC; Chen R; Zhang QH; Li K
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(5):969-75. PubMed ID: 18824793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A streamlined sustainability assessment tool for improved decision making in the urban water industry.
    Schulz M; Short MD; Peters GM
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Jan; 8(1):183-93. PubMed ID: 21751340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prioritization of rehabilitation interventions for urban water assets using multiple criteria decision-aid methods.
    Carriço N; Covas DI; Almeida MC; Leitão JP; Alegre H
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(5):1007-14. PubMed ID: 22797228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Feasibility versus sustainability in urban water management.
    Starkl M; Brunner N
    J Environ Manage; 2004 Jul; 71(3):245-60. PubMed ID: 15158287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Group decision-making analysis with complex spherical fuzzy N-soft sets.
    Akram M; Farooq A; Shabir M; Al-Shamiri MMA; Khalaf MM
    Math Biosci Eng; 2022 Mar; 19(5):4991-5030. PubMed ID: 35430851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dynamic metabolism modelling of urban water services--demonstrating effectiveness as a decision-support tool for Oslo, Norway.
    Venkatesh G; Sægrov S; Brattebø H
    Water Res; 2014 Sep; 61():19-33. PubMed ID: 24880242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of qualitative system dynamics to identify sustainability characteristics of decentralized wastewater management alternatives.
    Guest JS; Skerlos SJ; Daigger GT; Corbett JR; Love NG
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(6):1637-44. PubMed ID: 20351443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Service quality benchmarking via a novel approach based on fuzzy ELECTRE III and IPA: an empirical case involving the Italian public healthcare context.
    La Fata CM; Lupo T; Piazza T
    Health Care Manag Sci; 2019 Mar; 22(1):106-120. PubMed ID: 29164424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison between two methodologies for urban drainage decision aid.
    Moura PM; Baptista MB; Barraud S
    Water Sci Technol; 2006; 54(6-7):493-9. PubMed ID: 17120685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative systems analysis as a strategic planning approach for metropolitan water service providers.
    Lundie S; Peters G; Beavis P
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(9):11-20. PubMed ID: 16445169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating the potential water reuse based on fuzzy reasoning.
    Almeida G; Vieira J; Marques AS; Kiperstok A; Cardoso A
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Oct; 128():883-92. PubMed ID: 23880432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Decision support tools for urban water and wastewater systems--focussing on hazardous flows assessment.
    Malmqvist PA; Palmquist H
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(8):41-9. PubMed ID: 16007926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.