These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28237013)

  • 21. Effects of spatial response coding on distractor processing: evidence from auditory spatial negative priming tasks with keypress, joystick, and head movement responses.
    Möller M; Mayr S; Buchner A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jan; 77(1):293-310. PubMed ID: 25214304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Top-down modulation of auditory processing: effects of sound context, musical expertise and attentional focus.
    Tervaniemi M; Kruck S; De Baene W; Schröger E; Alter K; Friederici AD
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Oct; 30(8):1636-42. PubMed ID: 19821835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Contextual constraints on the activation of lexical forms by nonlinguistic sounds.
    Kukona A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2021 Jul; 47(7):963-976. PubMed ID: 34424026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Virtually spatialized sounds enhance auditory processing in healthy participants and patients with a disorder of consciousness.
    Heine L; Corneyllie A; Gobert F; Luauté J; Lavandier M; Perrin F
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jul; 11(1):13702. PubMed ID: 34211035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Relation of sound intensity and accuracy of localization.
    Farrimond T
    Percept Mot Skills; 1989 Aug; 69(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 2780198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Role of spectral detail in sound-source localization.
    Kulkarni A; Colburn HS
    Nature; 1998 Dec 24-31; 396(6713):747-9. PubMed ID: 9874370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Listener expertise and sound identification influence the categorization of environmental sounds.
    Lemaitre G; Houix O; Misdariis N; Susini P
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2010 Mar; 16(1):16-32. PubMed ID: 20350041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Office noise: Can headphones and masking sound attenuate distraction by background speech?
    Jahncke H; Björkeholm P; Marsh JE; Odelius J; Sörqvist P
    Work; 2016 Nov; 55(3):505-513. PubMed ID: 27768004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The process of auditory distraction: disrupted attention and impaired recall in a simulated lecture environment.
    Zeamer C; Fox Tree JE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1463-72. PubMed ID: 23565786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Identification of environmental sounds with varying spectral resolution.
    Shafiro V
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):401-20. PubMed ID: 18344871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of the short-term learned significance of task-irrelevant sounds on involuntary attention in children and adults.
    Wetzel N
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Oct; 98(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 26093029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Perceptual load does not modulate auditory distractor processing.
    Murphy S; Fraenkel N; Dalton P
    Cognition; 2013 Nov; 129(2):345-55. PubMed ID: 23969299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cognitive control of involuntary distraction by deviant sounds.
    Parmentier FB; Hebrero M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1635-41. PubMed ID: 23565784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An examination of the effects of broadband air-conduction masker on the speech intelligibility of speech-modulated bone-conduction ultrasound.
    Nishimura T; Okayasu T; Saito O; Shimokura R; Yamashita A; Yamanaka T; Hosoi H; Kitahara T
    Hear Res; 2014 Nov; 317():41-9. PubMed ID: 25285623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Attention to human speakers in a virtual auditory environment: brain potential evidence.
    Nager W; Dethlefsen C; Münte TF
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():164-70. PubMed ID: 18655852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of sound location on visual task performance and electrophysiological measures of distraction.
    Corral MJ; Escera C
    Neuroreport; 2008 Oct; 19(15):1535-9. PubMed ID: 18797312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect on directional hearing in hunters using amplifying (level dependent) hearing protectors.
    Borg E; Bergkvist C; Bagger-Sjöbäck D
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Aug; 29(5):579-85. PubMed ID: 18520633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Attention and pain: are auditory distractors special?
    Sloan P; Hollins M
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 May; 235(5):1593-1602. PubMed ID: 28260156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effects of intervening interference on working memory for sound location as a function of inter-comparison interval.
    Ries DT; Hamilton TR; Grossmann AJ
    Hear Res; 2010 Sep; 268(1-2):227-33. PubMed ID: 20547219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The linkage between stimulus frequency and covert peak areas as it relates to monaural localization.
    Rogers ME; Butler RA
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 Nov; 52(5):536-46. PubMed ID: 1437486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.