These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28237742)

  • 1. Sensor-array-based evaluation and grading of beef taste quality.
    Han Y; Wang X; Cai Y; Li Z; Zhao L; Wang H; Jin J; Cai Y; Xu L; Zhu L
    Meat Sci; 2017 Jul; 129():38-42. PubMed ID: 28237742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A PVC/polypyrrole sensor designed for beef taste detection using electrochemical methods and sensory evaluation.
    Zhu L; Wang X; Han Y; Cai Y; Jin J; Wang H; Xu L; Wu R
    Meat Sci; 2018 Mar; 137():1-8. PubMed ID: 29149624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Eating quality prediction of beef from Italian Simmental cattle based on experts' steak assessment.
    Borgogno M; Saccà E; Corazzin M; Favotto S; Bovolenta S; Piasentier E
    Meat Sci; 2016 Aug; 118():1-7. PubMed ID: 26998946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A predictive model for the evaluation of flavor attributes of raw and cooked beef based on sensor array analyses.
    Xu L; Wang X; Huang Y; Wang Y; Zhu L; Wu R
    Food Res Int; 2019 Aug; 122():16-24. PubMed ID: 31229068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of beef eating quality by Irish consumers.
    McCarthy SN; Henchion M; White A; Brandon K; Allen P
    Meat Sci; 2017 Oct; 132():118-124. PubMed ID: 28522169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do demographic and beef eating preferences impact on South African consumers' willingness to pay (WTP) for graded beef?
    Strydom P; Burrow H; Polkinghorne R; Thompson J
    Meat Sci; 2019 Apr; 150():122-130. PubMed ID: 30677552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Beef assessments using functional magnetic resonance imaging and sensory evaluation.
    Tapp WN; Davis TH; Paniukov D; Brooks JC; Brashears MM; Miller MF
    Meat Sci; 2017 Apr; 126():11-17. PubMed ID: 27984700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Smart chemical taste sensor for determination and prediction of taste qualities based on a two-phase optimized radial basis function network.
    Ishihara S; Ikeda A; Citterio D; Maruyama K; Hagiwara M; Suzuki K
    Anal Chem; 2005 Dec; 77(24):7908-15. PubMed ID: 16351137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exploring innovative possibilities of recovering the value of dark-cutting beef in the Canadian grading system.
    Prieto N; López-Campos Ó; Suman SP; Uttaro B; Rodas-González A; Aalhus JL
    Meat Sci; 2018 Mar; 137():77-84. PubMed ID: 29154222
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Identification of the taste enhancer alapyridaine in beef broth and evaluation of its sensory impact by taste reconstitution experiments.
    Ottinger H; Hofmann T
    J Agric Food Chem; 2003 Nov; 51(23):6791-6. PubMed ID: 14582976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sensory characteristics and consumer acceptability of beef stock containing glutathione Maillard reaction products prepared at various conditions.
    Kwon GY; Hong JH; Kim YS; Lee SM; Kim KO
    J Food Sci; 2011; 76(1):S1-7. PubMed ID: 21535706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Consumer and trained panel evaluation of beef strip steaks of varying marbling and enhancement levels cooked to three degrees of doneness.
    Lucherk LW; O'Quinn TG; Legako JF; Rathmann RJ; Brooks JC; Miller MF
    Meat Sci; 2016 Dec; 122():145-154. PubMed ID: 27544884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sensory characteristics and consumer acceptability of beef stock containing the glutathione-xylose Maillard reaction product and/or monosodium glutamate.
    Hong JH; Kwon KY; Kim KO
    J Food Sci; 2012 Jun; 77(6):S233-9. PubMed ID: 22591448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of retail packaging method on objective and consumer assessment of beef quality traits.
    Geesink G; Robertson J; Ball A
    Meat Sci; 2015 Jun; 104():85-9. PubMed ID: 25732179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlation between skeletal muscle fiber type and responses of a taste sensing system in various beef samples.
    Komiya Y; Mizunoya W; Kajiwara K; Yokoyama I; Ogasawara H; Arihara K
    Anim Sci J; 2020; 91(1):e13425. PubMed ID: 32691493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application of a taste evaluation system to the monitoring of Kimchi fermentation.
    Kim N; Park KR; Park IS; Cho YJ; Bae YM
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2005 May; 20(11):2283-91. PubMed ID: 15797327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. N,N'-Diphenylthiourea electrochemical sensor for the detection of l-glutamate and Aspartate in beef.
    Wang X; Hu F; Zhu L; Liu D; Dong Y; Wang C; Wu D
    J Food Sci; 2020 Nov; 85(11):3852-3857. PubMed ID: 33067859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A unique method for detecting beef tenderness based on viscoelasticity principle.
    Long Y; Tang X; Wang W; Peng Y; Dong X; Kang X; Li Y
    J Texture Stud; 2017 Oct; 48(5):433-438. PubMed ID: 28967212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An emotional approach to beef evaluation.
    Borgogno M; Cardello AV; Favotto S; Piasentier E
    Meat Sci; 2017 May; 127():1-5. PubMed ID: 28088036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of consumer sensory acceptance, purchase intention, and willingness to pay for high quality United States and Spanish beef under different information scenarios.
    Beriain MJ; Sánchez M; Carr TR
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Oct; 87(10):3392-402. PubMed ID: 19542506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.