139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2823785)
1. Management of squamous atypia (borderline nuclear abnormalities): repeat cytology or colposcopy?
Tay SK; Jenkins D; Singer A
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1987 May; 27(2):140-1. PubMed ID: 2823785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The significance of human papilloma virus atypia ('wart virus infection') found alone on cervical cytology screening.
Pagano R; Chanen W; Rome RM; Johnstone NR
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1987 May; 27(2):136-9. PubMed ID: 2823784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia among young women with abnormal screening cytology.
Massad SL; Markwell S; Cejtin HE; Collins Y
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2005 Oct; 9(4):225-9. PubMed ID: 16205193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prevalence of High-Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Patients with Cytology Presenting Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance.
Marcos Lopes AC; Campaner AB; Henrique LQ
Acta Cytol; 2016; 60(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 27215420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cervical disease in women referred to colposcopy following inadequate smears.
Hollingworth J; Kotecha K; Dobbs SP; Shaw PA; Ireland D
Cytopathology; 2000 Feb; 11(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 10714375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the atypical cytologic smear. Validity of the 1991 Bethesda System.
Widra EA; Dookhan D; Jordan A; McCue P; Bibbo M; Dunton CJ
J Reprod Med; 1994 Sep; 39(9):682-4. PubMed ID: 7807479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Significance of atypical cervical cytology in pregnancy.
Kaminski PF; Lyon DS; Sorosky JI; Wheelock JB; Podczaski ES
Am J Perinatol; 1992; 9(5-6):340-3. PubMed ID: 1418129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Squamous atypia on cytology. The influence of age.
Kaminski PF; Stevens CW; Wheelock JB
J Reprod Med; 1989 Sep; 34(9):617-20. PubMed ID: 2553961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Routine colposcopic survey of patients with squamous atypia. A method for identifying cases with false-negative smears.
Cecchini S; Iossa A; Ciatto S; Bonardi L; Confortini M; Cipparrone G; Taddei G; Cianferoni L; Scuderi A
Acta Cytol; 1990; 34(6):778-80. PubMed ID: 2175135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcome of women referred to colposcopy for persistently inadequate smears.
Sen C; Brett MT
Cytopathology; 2000 Feb; 11(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 10714374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cytological and histological outcome following a borderline cervical smear.
Rawal N; Saridogan E; Weekes AW; Haq Khan N
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2003 Jul; 23(4):419-21. PubMed ID: 12881086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outcome analysis of 4 years' follow-up of patients referred for colposcopy with one smear showing mild dyskaryosis.
Ahmed AS; Goumalatsos G; Akbar N; Lawton FG; Savvas M
Cytopathology; 2008 Apr; 19(2):94-105. PubMed ID: 17937774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Intraepithelial cervical carcinoma and HIV. Prevalence, risk factors and prevention strategies].
Soncini E; Condemi V
Minerva Ginecol; 2003 Feb; 55(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 12598843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic value of cytology and colposcopy for squamous and glandular cervical intraepithelial lesions.
Pajtler M; Audy-Jurković S; Ovanin-Rakić A; Makarović Z; Milojković M; Ljubojević N
Coll Antropol; 2003 Jun; 27(1):239-46. PubMed ID: 12974152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cytological surveillance compared with immediate referral for colposcopy in management of women with low grade cervical abnormalities: multicentre randomised controlled trial.
TOMBOLA Group
BMJ; 2009 Jul; 339():b2546. PubMed ID: 19638646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The incidence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in a population of pregnant women with an abnormal cytology.
Pruski D; Malkowska-Walczak B; Paluszkiewicz A; Kędzia W
Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(1):20-23. PubMed ID: 28157250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Colposcopic and histologic findings in women with a cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
Yarandi F; Izadi Mood N; Mirashrafi F; Eftekhar Z
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Dec; 44(6):514-6. PubMed ID: 15598287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The significance of atypical cervical cytology in an older population.
Kaminski PF; Sorosky JI; Wheelock JB; Stevens CW
Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Jan; 73(1):13-5. PubMed ID: 2535763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical relevance of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance by the 2001 bethesda system: experience from a cervical cancer high incidence region.
Kantathavorn N; Kietpeerakool C; Suprasert P; Srisomboon J; Khunamornpong S; Nimmanhaeminda K; Siriaungkul S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2008; 9(4):785-8. PubMed ID: 19256777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. False negative colposcopy is associated with thinner cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 and 3.
Yang B; Pretorius RG; Belinson JL; Zhang X; Burchette R; Qiao YL
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Jul; 110(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 18485462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
