241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28237866)
1. Cost-effectiveness of capecitabine and bevacizumab maintenance treatment after first-line induction treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Franken MD; van Rooijen EM; May AM; Koffijberg H; van Tinteren H; Mol L; Ten Tije AJ; Creemers GJ; van der Velden AMT; Tanis BC; Uyl-de Groot CA; Punt CJA; Koopman M; van Oijen MGH
Eur J Cancer; 2017 Apr; 75():204-212. PubMed ID: 28237866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of Maintenance Capecitabine and Bevacizumab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Sherman SK; Lange JJ; Dahdaleh FS; Rajeev R; Gamblin TC; Polite BN; Turaga KK
JAMA Oncol; 2019 Feb; 5(2):236-242. PubMed ID: 30489611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness analysis of capecitabine plus bevacizumab versus capecitabine alone in elderly patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer from Chinese societal perspective.
Zhang PF; Wen F; Zhou J; Huang JX; Zhou KX; Wu QJ; Wang XY; Zhang MX; Liao WT; Li Q
Clin Transl Oncol; 2020 Jan; 22(1):103-110. PubMed ID: 31062173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bevacizumab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Global Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Goldstein DA; Chen Q; Ayer T; Chan KKW; Virik K; Hammerman A; Brenner B; Flowers CR; Hall PS
Oncologist; 2017 Jun; 22(6):694-699. PubMed ID: 28592621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-Effectiveness of Treatment Sequences of Chemotherapies and Targeted Biologics for Elderly Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients.
Parikh RC; Du XL; Robert MO; Lairson DR
J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2017 Jan; 23(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 28025930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Capecitabine plus bevacizumab versus capecitabine in maintenance treatment for untreated characterised KRAS exon 2 wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective analysis in Chinese postmenopausal women.
Su J; Lai J; Yang R; Xu B; Zhu Y; Zhao M; Yang C; Liang G
BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):17. PubMed ID: 30683047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Economic analysis of bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
Lawrence D; Maschio M; Leahy KJ; Yunger S; Easaw JC; Weinstein MC
J Med Econ; 2013 Dec; 16(12):1387-98. PubMed ID: 24102083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness analysis of panitumumab plus mFOLFOX6 compared with bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 for first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer.
Graham CN; Hechmati G; Hjelmgren J; de Liège F; Lanier J; Knox H; Barber B
Eur J Cancer; 2014 Nov; 50(16):2791-801. PubMed ID: 25219451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of panitumumab compared with bevacizumab in the first-line treatment of patients with wild-type RAS metastatic colorectal cancer in the US.
Graham CN; Christodoulopoulou A; Knox HN; Sabatelli L; Hechmati G; Garawin T; Strickler JH
J Med Econ; 2018 Nov; 21(11):1075-1083. PubMed ID: 30091652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. First- and second-line bevacizumab in addition to chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a United States-based cost-effectiveness analysis.
Goldstein DA; Chen Q; Ayer T; Howard DH; Lipscomb J; El-Rayes BF; Flowers CR
J Clin Oncol; 2015 Apr; 33(10):1112-8. PubMed ID: 25691669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness analysis of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in Japan.
Shiroiwa T; Fukuda T; Tsutani K
Clin Ther; 2007 Oct; 29(10):2256-67. PubMed ID: 18042483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer: evaluation of National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group CO.17 trial.
Mittmann N; Au HJ; Tu D; O'Callaghan CJ; Isogai PK; Karapetis CS; Zalcberg JR; Evans WK; Moore MJ; Siddiqui J; Findlay B; Colwell B; Simes J; Gibbs P; Links M; Tebbutt NC; Jonker DJ; ;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Sep; 101(17):1182-92. PubMed ID: 19666851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Maintenance treatment with capecitabine and bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer (CAIRO3): a phase 3 randomised controlled trial of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group.
Simkens LH; van Tinteren H; May A; ten Tije AJ; Creemers GJ; Loosveld OJ; de Jongh FE; Erdkamp FL; Erjavec Z; van der Torren AM; Tol J; Braun HJ; Nieboer P; van der Hoeven JJ; Haasjes JG; Jansen RL; Wals J; Cats A; Derleyn VA; Honkoop AH; Mol L; Punt CJ; Koopman M
Lancet; 2015 May; 385(9980):1843-52. PubMed ID: 25862517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-Effectiveness of Cetuximab as First-line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in the United States.
Shankaran V; Ortendahl JD; Purdum AG; Bolinder B; Anene AM; Sun GH; Bentley TGK
Am J Clin Oncol; 2018 Jan; 41(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 26398184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Incremental cost-effectiveness of the pre- and post-bevacizumab eras of metastatic colorectal cancer therapy in British Columbia, Canada.
Hedden L; Kennecke H; Villa D; Johnston K; Speers C; Kovacic L; Renouf DJ; Peacock S
Eur J Cancer; 2012 Sep; 48(13):1969-76. PubMed ID: 22325838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Bevacizumab plus Paclitaxel versus Bevacizumab plus Capecitabine for HER2-Negative Locally Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer.
Wu Q; Wang X; Zhang M; Liao W; Wang F; Li Q
Oncol Res Treat; 2020; 43(4):153-159. PubMed ID: 32187596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness of Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab vs Sorafenib for Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
Zhang X; Wang J; Shi J; Jia X; Dang S; Wang W
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Apr; 4(4):e214846. PubMed ID: 33825837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness analysis of selective first-line use of biologics for unresectable
Wong WWL; Zargar M; Berry SR; Ko YJ; Riesco-Martínez M; Chan KKW
Curr Oncol; 2019 Oct; 26(5):e597-e609. PubMed ID: 31708653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bevacizumab Continuation Versus Treatment Holidays After First-Line Chemotherapy With Bevacizumab in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Health Economic Analysis of a Randomized Phase 3 Trial (SAKK 41/06).
Matter-Walstra K; Schwenkglenks M; Betticher D; von Moos R; Dietrich D; Baertschi D; Koeberle D
Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2016 Dec; 15(4):314-320.e2. PubMed ID: 27117056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Everolimus plus exemestane versus bevacizumab-based chemotherapy for second-line treatment of hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer in Greece: An economic evaluation study.
Kourlaba G; Rapti V; Alexopoulos A; Relakis J; Koumakis G; Chatzikou M; Maniadakis N; Georgoulias V
BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 Aug; 15():307. PubMed ID: 26239115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
