696 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28238177)
1. Digital volumetric measurement of mammographic density and the risk of overlooking cancer in Japanese women.
Sawada T; Akashi S; Nakamura S; Kuwayama T; Enokido K; Yoshida M; Hashimoto R; Ide T; Masuda H; Taruno K; Oyama H; Takamaru T; Kanada Y; Ikeda M; Kosugi N; Sato H; Nakayama S; Ata A; Tonouchi Y; Sakai H; Matsunaga Y; Matsutani A
Breast Cancer; 2017 Sep; 24(5):708-713. PubMed ID: 28238177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in comparison to conventional full-field digital mammography in a population of women with dense breasts.
Mori M; Akashi-Tanaka S; Suzuki S; Daniels MI; Watanabe C; Hirose M; Nakamura S
Breast Cancer; 2017 Jan; 24(1):104-110. PubMed ID: 26942415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated Volumetric Analysis of Mammographic Density in a Screening Setting: Worse Outcomes for Women with Dense Breasts.
Moshina N; Sebuødegård S; Lee CI; Akslen LA; Tsuruda KM; Elmore JG; Hofvind S
Radiology; 2018 Aug; 288(2):343-352. PubMed ID: 29944088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does three-dimensional functional infrared imaging improve breast cancer detection based on digital mammography in women with dense breasts?
Hellgren RJ; Sundbom AE; Czene K; Izhaky D; Hall P; Dickman PW
Eur Radiol; 2019 Nov; 29(11):6227-6235. PubMed ID: 31115623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A prospective comparative trial of adjunct screening with tomosynthesis or ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts (ASTOUND-2).
Tagliafico AS; Mariscotti G; Valdora F; Durando M; Nori J; La Forgia D; Rosenberg I; Caumo F; Gandolfo N; Sormani MP; Signori A; Calabrese M; Houssami N
Eur J Cancer; 2018 Nov; 104():39-46. PubMed ID: 30316869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Positive predictive values by mammographic density and screening mode in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program.
Moshina N; Ursin G; Roman M; Sebuødegård S; Hofvind S
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):248-254. PubMed ID: 26724673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast Cancer Risk and Mammographic Density Assessed with Semiautomated and Fully Automated Methods and BI-RADS.
Jeffers AM; Sieh W; Lipson JA; Rothstein JH; McGuire V; Whittemore AS; Rubin DL
Radiology; 2017 Feb; 282(2):348-355. PubMed ID: 27598536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors Associated With Rates of False-Positive and False-Negative Results From Digital Mammography Screening: An Analysis of Registry Data.
Nelson HD; O'Meara ES; Kerlikowske K; Balch S; Miglioretti D
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):226-35. PubMed ID: 26756902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Invasive cancers detected after breast cancer screening yielded a negative result: relationship of mammographic density to tumor prognostic factors.
Roubidoux MA; Bailey JE; Wray LA; Helvie MA
Radiology; 2004 Jan; 230(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 14695385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection (CAD) of breast cancer].
Yang KY; Liu XJ; Zhai RY
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 May; 34(5):360-3. PubMed ID: 22883457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcomes of screening mammography by frequency, breast density, and postmenopausal hormone therapy.
Kerlikowske K; Zhu W; Hubbard RA; Geller B; Dittus K; Braithwaite D; Wernli KJ; Miglioretti DL; O'Meara ES;
JAMA Intern Med; 2013 May; 173(9):807-16. PubMed ID: 23552817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
Melnikow J; Fenton JJ; Whitlock EP; Miglioretti DL; Weyrich MS; Thompson JH; Shah K
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):268-78. PubMed ID: 26757021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection for breast cancer.
Brem RF; Hoffmeister JW; Rapelyea JA; Zisman G; Mohtashemi K; Jindal G; Disimio MP; Rogers SK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Feb; 184(2):439-44. PubMed ID: 15671360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative study of breast-specific gamma imaging with the conventional imaging modality in breast cancer patients with dense breasts.
Kim BS; Moon BI; Cha ES
Ann Nucl Med; 2012 Dec; 26(10):823-9. PubMed ID: 22922890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast-specific gamma imaging or ultrasonography as adjunct imaging diagnostics in women with mammographically dense breasts.
Zhang Z; Wang W; Wang X; Yu X; Zhu Y; Zhan H; Chen Z; Li B; Huang J
Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6062-6071. PubMed ID: 32524221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ultrasound and Clinical Characteristics of False-negative Results in Mammography Screening of Dense Breasts.
Pu H; Peng J; Xu F; Liu N; Wang F; Huang X; Jia Y
Clin Breast Cancer; 2020 Aug; 20(4):317-325. PubMed ID: 32229176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Consistency of breast density categories in serial screening mammograms: A comparison between automated and human assessment.
Holland K; van Zelst J; den Heeten GJ; Imhof-Tas M; Mann RM; van Gils CH; Karssemeijer N
Breast; 2016 Oct; 29():49-54. PubMed ID: 27420382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of volumetric breast density on the risk of screen-detected and interval breast cancers: a cohort study.
Wanders JOP; Holland K; Karssemeijer N; Peeters PHM; Veldhuis WB; Mann RM; van Gils CH
Breast Cancer Res; 2017 Jun; 19(1):67. PubMed ID: 28583146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of supplemental ultrasonography screening for women with dense breasts.
Sprague BL; Stout NK; Schechter C; van Ravesteyn NT; Cevik M; Alagoz O; Lee CI; van den Broek JJ; Miglioretti DL; Mandelblatt JS; de Koning HJ; Kerlikowske K; Lehman CD; Tosteson AN
Ann Intern Med; 2015 Feb; 162(3):157-66. PubMed ID: 25486550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
