These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
718 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28238177)
1. Digital volumetric measurement of mammographic density and the risk of overlooking cancer in Japanese women. Sawada T; Akashi S; Nakamura S; Kuwayama T; Enokido K; Yoshida M; Hashimoto R; Ide T; Masuda H; Taruno K; Oyama H; Takamaru T; Kanada Y; Ikeda M; Kosugi N; Sato H; Nakayama S; Ata A; Tonouchi Y; Sakai H; Matsunaga Y; Matsutani A Breast Cancer; 2017 Sep; 24(5):708-713. PubMed ID: 28238177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in comparison to conventional full-field digital mammography in a population of women with dense breasts. Mori M; Akashi-Tanaka S; Suzuki S; Daniels MI; Watanabe C; Hirose M; Nakamura S Breast Cancer; 2017 Jan; 24(1):104-110. PubMed ID: 26942415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated Volumetric Analysis of Mammographic Density in a Screening Setting: Worse Outcomes for Women with Dense Breasts. Moshina N; Sebuødegård S; Lee CI; Akslen LA; Tsuruda KM; Elmore JG; Hofvind S Radiology; 2018 Aug; 288(2):343-352. PubMed ID: 29944088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does three-dimensional functional infrared imaging improve breast cancer detection based on digital mammography in women with dense breasts? Hellgren RJ; Sundbom AE; Czene K; Izhaky D; Hall P; Dickman PW Eur Radiol; 2019 Nov; 29(11):6227-6235. PubMed ID: 31115623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A prospective comparative trial of adjunct screening with tomosynthesis or ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts (ASTOUND-2). Tagliafico AS; Mariscotti G; Valdora F; Durando M; Nori J; La Forgia D; Rosenberg I; Caumo F; Gandolfo N; Sormani MP; Signori A; Calabrese M; Houssami N Eur J Cancer; 2018 Nov; 104():39-46. PubMed ID: 30316869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Positive predictive values by mammographic density and screening mode in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program. Moshina N; Ursin G; Roman M; Sebuødegård S; Hofvind S Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):248-254. PubMed ID: 26724673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast Cancer Risk and Mammographic Density Assessed with Semiautomated and Fully Automated Methods and BI-RADS. Jeffers AM; Sieh W; Lipson JA; Rothstein JH; McGuire V; Whittemore AS; Rubin DL Radiology; 2017 Feb; 282(2):348-355. PubMed ID: 27598536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Invasive cancers detected after breast cancer screening yielded a negative result: relationship of mammographic density to tumor prognostic factors. Roubidoux MA; Bailey JE; Wray LA; Helvie MA Radiology; 2004 Jan; 230(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 14695385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection (CAD) of breast cancer]. Yang KY; Liu XJ; Zhai RY Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 May; 34(5):360-3. PubMed ID: 22883457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Melnikow J; Fenton JJ; Whitlock EP; Miglioretti DL; Weyrich MS; Thompson JH; Shah K Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):268-78. PubMed ID: 26757021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection for breast cancer. Brem RF; Hoffmeister JW; Rapelyea JA; Zisman G; Mohtashemi K; Jindal G; Disimio MP; Rogers SK AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Feb; 184(2):439-44. PubMed ID: 15671360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparative study of breast-specific gamma imaging with the conventional imaging modality in breast cancer patients with dense breasts. Kim BS; Moon BI; Cha ES Ann Nucl Med; 2012 Dec; 26(10):823-9. PubMed ID: 22922890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast-specific gamma imaging or ultrasonography as adjunct imaging diagnostics in women with mammographically dense breasts. Zhang Z; Wang W; Wang X; Yu X; Zhu Y; Zhan H; Chen Z; Li B; Huang J Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6062-6071. PubMed ID: 32524221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ultrasound and Clinical Characteristics of False-negative Results in Mammography Screening of Dense Breasts. Pu H; Peng J; Xu F; Liu N; Wang F; Huang X; Jia Y Clin Breast Cancer; 2020 Aug; 20(4):317-325. PubMed ID: 32229176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Consistency of breast density categories in serial screening mammograms: A comparison between automated and human assessment. Holland K; van Zelst J; den Heeten GJ; Imhof-Tas M; Mann RM; van Gils CH; Karssemeijer N Breast; 2016 Oct; 29():49-54. PubMed ID: 27420382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of volumetric breast density on the risk of screen-detected and interval breast cancers: a cohort study. Wanders JOP; Holland K; Karssemeijer N; Peeters PHM; Veldhuis WB; Mann RM; van Gils CH Breast Cancer Res; 2017 Jun; 19(1):67. PubMed ID: 28583146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of supplemental ultrasonography screening for women with dense breasts. Sprague BL; Stout NK; Schechter C; van Ravesteyn NT; Cevik M; Alagoz O; Lee CI; van den Broek JJ; Miglioretti DL; Mandelblatt JS; de Koning HJ; Kerlikowske K; Lehman CD; Tosteson AN Ann Intern Med; 2015 Feb; 162(3):157-66. PubMed ID: 25486550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Identifying women with dense breasts at high risk for interval cancer: a cohort study. Kerlikowske K; Zhu W; Tosteson AN; Sprague BL; Tice JA; Lehman CD; Miglioretti DL; Ann Intern Med; 2015 May; 162(10):673-81. PubMed ID: 25984843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]