These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

718 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28238177)

  • 21. Adding 3D automated breast ultrasound to mammography screening in women with heterogeneously and extremely dense breasts: Report from a hospital-based, high-volume, single-center breast cancer screening program.
    Wilczek B; Wilczek HE; Rasouliyan L; Leifland K
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Sep; 85(9):1554-63. PubMed ID: 27501888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Factors Associated With Rates of False-Positive and False-Negative Results From Digital Mammography Screening: An Analysis of Registry Data.
    Nelson HD; O'Meara ES; Kerlikowske K; Balch S; Miglioretti D
    Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):226-35. PubMed ID: 26756902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [DEVELOPMENTS IN BREAST IMAGING].
    Akashi-Tanaka S
    Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 2016 Nov; 117(6):483-90. PubMed ID: 30173471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Effect of California's Breast Density Notification Legislation on Breast Cancer Screening.
    Chau SL; Alabaster A; Luikart K; Brenman LM; Habel LA
    J Prim Care Community Health; 2017 Apr; 8(2):55-62. PubMed ID: 27799412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The relationship of mammographic density and age: implications for breast cancer screening.
    Checka CM; Chun JE; Schnabel FR; Lee J; Toth H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Mar; 198(3):W292-5. PubMed ID: 22358028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Retrospective and comparative analysis of (99m)Tc-Sestamibi breast specific gamma imaging versus mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of breast cancer in Chinese women.
    Yu X; Hu G; Zhang Z; Qiu F; Shao X; Wang X; Zhan H; Chen Y; Deng Y; Huang J
    BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():450. PubMed ID: 27401536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Application of the downgrade criteria to supplemental screening ultrasound for women with negative mammography but dense breasts.
    Kim SY; Kim MJ; Moon HJ; Yoon JH; Kim EK
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Nov; 95(44):e5279. PubMed ID: 27858896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Tailoring Breast Cancer Screening Intervals by Breast Density and Risk for Women Aged 50 Years or Older: Collaborative Modeling of Screening Outcomes.
    Trentham-Dietz A; Kerlikowske K; Stout NK; Miglioretti DL; Schechter CB; Ergun MA; van den Broek JJ; Alagoz O; Sprague BL; van Ravesteyn NT; Near AM; Gangnon RE; Hampton JM; Chandler Y; de Koning HJ; Mandelblatt JS; Tosteson AN;
    Ann Intern Med; 2016 Nov; 165(10):700-712. PubMed ID: 27548583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. AI performance by mammographic density in a retrospective cohort study of 99,489 participants in BreastScreen Norway.
    Bergan MB; Larsen M; Moshina N; Bartsch H; Koch HW; Aase HS; Satybaldinov Z; Haldorsen IHS; Lee CI; Hofvind S
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Oct; 34(10):6298-6308. PubMed ID: 38528136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. MR Imaging as an Additional Screening Modality for the Detection of Breast Cancer in Women Aged 50-75 Years with Extremely Dense Breasts: The DENSE Trial Study Design.
    Emaus MJ; Bakker MF; Peeters PH; Loo CE; Mann RM; de Jong MD; Bisschops RH; Veltman J; Duvivier KM; Lobbes MB; Pijnappel RM; Karssemeijer N; de Koning HJ; van den Bosch MA; Monninkhof EM; Mali WP; Veldhuis WB; van Gils CH
    Radiology; 2015 Nov; 277(2):527-37. PubMed ID: 26110667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Parenchymal pattern in women with dense breasts. Variation with age and impact on screening outcomes: observations from a UK screening programme.
    Ward L; Heller S; Hudson S; Wilkinson L
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Nov; 28(11):4717-4724. PubMed ID: 29808426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reducing False-Positive Screening MRI Rate in Women with Extremely Dense Breasts Using Prediction Models Based on Data from the DENSE Trial.
    den Dekker BM; Bakker MF; de Lange SV; Veldhuis WB; van Diest PJ; Duvivier KM; Lobbes MBI; Loo CE; Mann RM; Monninkhof EM; Veltman J; Pijnappel RM; van Gils CH;
    Radiology; 2021 Nov; 301(2):283-292. PubMed ID: 34402665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Optimal Breast Density Characterization Using a Three-Dimensional Automated Breast Densitometry System.
    Yoshida R; Yamauchi T; Akashi-Tanaka S; Matsuyanagi M; Taruno K; Sawada T; Kokaze A; Nakamura S
    Curr Oncol; 2021 Dec; 28(6):5384-5394. PubMed ID: 34940087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Yield of Pre-operative Breast MRI in Patients According to Breast Tissue Density.
    Seely JM; Lamb L; Malik N; Lau J
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Sep; 26(9):3280-9. PubMed ID: 26620958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evidence of the effect of adjunct ultrasound screening in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: interval breast cancers at 1 year follow-up.
    Corsetti V; Houssami N; Ghirardi M; Ferrari A; Speziani M; Bellarosa S; Remida G; Gasparotti C; Galligioni E; Ciatto S
    Eur J Cancer; 2011 May; 47(7):1021-6. PubMed ID: 21211962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41.
    Hooley RJ; Greenberg KL; Stackhouse RM; Geisel JL; Butler RS; Philpotts LE
    Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 22723501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation.
    Nelson HD; Pappas M; Cantor A; Griffin J; Daeges M; Humphrey L
    Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):256-67. PubMed ID: 26756737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Volumetric breast density affects performance of digital screening mammography.
    Wanders JO; Holland K; Veldhuis WB; Mann RM; Pijnappel RM; Peeters PH; van Gils CH; Karssemeijer N
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Feb; 162(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 28012087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Mammographic density and breast cancer risk in breast screening assessment cases and women with a family history of breast cancer.
    Duffy SW; Morrish OWE; Allgood PC; Black R; Gillan MGC; Willsher P; Cooke J; Duncan KA; Michell MJ; Dobson HM; Maroni R; Lim YY; Purushothaman HN; Suaris T; Astley SM; Young KC; Tucker L; Gilbert FJ
    Eur J Cancer; 2018 Jan; 88():48-56. PubMed ID: 29190506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Radiologist-performed hand-held ultrasound screening at average risk of breast cancer: results from a single health screening center.
    Chang JM; Koo HR; Moon WK
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Jun; 56(6):652-8. PubMed ID: 24951614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 36.