These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28238178)
1. Verification of recall criteria for masses detected on ultrasound breast cancer screening. Ban K; Tsunoda H; Suzuki S; Takaki R; Sasaki K; Nakagawa M J Med Ultrason (2001); 2018 Jan; 45(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 28238178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. B-mode ultrasound diagnostic flowchart for solid breast masses: JABTS BC-01 study. Watanabe T; Yamaguchi T; Tohno E; Tsunoda H; Kaoku S; Ban K; Watanabe R; Umemoto T; Hirokaga K; Ito T J Med Ultrason (2001); 2021 Jan; 48(1):71-81. PubMed ID: 33389372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of adding screening ultrasonography to screening mammography on patient recall and cancer detection rates: a retrospective study in Japan. Tohno E; Umemoto T; Sasaki K; Morishima I; Ueno E Eur J Radiol; 2013 Aug; 82(8):1227-30. PubMed ID: 23465737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Analysis of the results of 137 subclinical breast lesions excisions. Value of ultrasonography in the early diagnosis of breast cancer]. Jacob D; Brombart JC; Muller C; Lefèbvre C; Massa F; Depoerck A J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997; 26(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 9091540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic value of halo sign in young women (aged 45 to 49 years) in a breast screening programme with synthesized 2D mammography. Sánchez-Camacho González-Carrato MP; Romero Castellano C; Aguilar Angulo PM; Cruz Hernández LM; Sánchez Casado M; Ruiz Martín J; Fraile Alonso I; Pinto Varela JM; Martínez-Vizcaíno V Br J Radiol; 2018 Dec; 91(1092):20180444. PubMed ID: 30059237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ultrasound as the Primary Screening Test for Breast Cancer: Analysis From ACRIN 6666. Berg WA; Bandos AI; Mendelson EB; Lehrer D; Jong RA; Pisano ED J Natl Cancer Inst; 2016 Apr; 108(4):. PubMed ID: 26712110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Recall criteria for ultrasound breast cancer screening. Terminology and Diagnostic Criteria Committee, Japan Society of Ultrasonics in Medicine J Med Ultrason (2001); 2016 Apr; 43(2):301-13. PubMed ID: 26883856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Criteria of dignity in ultrasound mammography using a 10-MHz-transducer, also with regard to tumor size]. Marquet KL; Wolter M; Handt S; Rath W; Stressig R; Kozlowski P; Funk A Ultraschall Med; 2002 Dec; 23(6):383-7. PubMed ID: 12514754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing improvement in detection of breast cancer with three-dimensional automated breast US in women with dense breast tissue: the SomoInsight Study. Brem RF; Tabár L; Duffy SW; Inciardi MF; Guingrich JA; Hashimoto BE; Lander MR; Lapidus RL; Peterson MK; Rapelyea JA; Roux S; Schilling KJ; Shah BA; Torrente J; Wynn RT; Miller DP Radiology; 2015 Mar; 274(3):663-73. PubMed ID: 25329763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automated Breast Volume Scanning: Identifying 3-D Coronal Plane Imaging Features May Help Categorize Complex Cysts. Wang HY; Jiang YX; Zhu QL; Zhang J; Xiao MS; Liu H; Dai Q; Li JC; Sun Q Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Mar; 42(3):689-98. PubMed ID: 26742895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of ultrasound in breast imaging. Hatfield GP; Hogan MT W V Med J; 2009 Oct; 105 Spec No():64-6. PubMed ID: 19999269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relative and combined performance of mammography and ultrasonography for breast cancer screening in the general population: a pilot study in Tochigi Prefecture, Japan. Honjo S; Ando J; Tsukioka T; Morikubo H; Ichimura M; Sunagawa M; Hasegawa T; Watanabe T; Kodama T; Tominaga K; Sasagawa M; Koyama Y Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2007 Sep; 37(9):715-20. PubMed ID: 17766996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of classification of breast ultrasound findings based on criteria used for BI-RADS. Heinig J; Witteler R; Schmitz R; Kiesel L; Steinhard J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 32(4):573-8. PubMed ID: 18421795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis (3D mammography) with acquired or synthetic 2D mammography compared with 2D mammography alone (STORM-2): a population-based prospective study. Bernardi D; Macaskill P; Pellegrini M; Valentini M; Fantò C; Ostillio L; Tuttobene P; Luparia A; Houssami N Lancet Oncol; 2016 Aug; 17(8):1105-1113. PubMed ID: 27345635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening for Breast Cancer. Niell BL; Freer PE; Weinfurtner RJ; Arleo EK; Drukteinis JS Radiol Clin North Am; 2017 Nov; 55(6):1145-1162. PubMed ID: 28991557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41. Hooley RJ; Greenberg KL; Stackhouse RM; Geisel JL; Butler RS; Philpotts LE Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 22723501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Promotion of quality-controlled mammography alone as a screening modality in Japan. Morimoto T; Tangoku A; Yamakawa T; Tsuruno M; Takashima S Breast Cancer; 2014 Jul; 21(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 23515946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. ACR Appropriateness Criteria Breast Cancer Screening. Mainiero MB; Lourenco A; Mahoney MC; Newell MS; Bailey L; Barke LD; D'Orsi C; Harvey JA; Hayes MK; Huynh PT; Jokich PM; Lee SJ; Lehman CD; Mankoff DA; Nepute JA; Patel SB; Reynolds HE; Sutherland ML; Haffty BG J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Nov; 13(11S):R45-R49. PubMed ID: 27814813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Magnetic resonance imaging and breast ultrasonography as an adjunct to mammographic screening in high-risk patients. Le-Petross HT; Shetty MK Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2011 Aug; 32(4):266-72. PubMed ID: 21782116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]