446 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28238543)
1. Comparison of auscultatory and oscillometric BP measurements in children with obesity and their effect on the diagnosis of arterial hypertension.
Fonseca-Reyes S; Romero-Velarde E; Torres-Gudiño E; Illescas-Zarate D; Forsyth-MacQuarrie AM
Arch Cardiol Mex; 2018; 88(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 28238543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of oscillometric blood pressure measurements at the wrist with an upper-arm auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer.
Rogers P; Burke V; Stroud P; Puddey IB
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 1999; 26(5-6):477-81. PubMed ID: 10386242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability of resting blood pressure measurement and classification using an oscillometric device in children with chronic kidney disease.
Flynn JT; Pierce CB; Miller ER; Charleston J; Samuels JA; Kupferman J; Furth SL; Warady BA;
J Pediatr; 2012 Mar; 160(3):434-440.e1. PubMed ID: 22048052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Replacing the mercury manometer with an oscillometric device in a hypertension clinic: implications for clinical decision making.
Stergiou GS; Lourida P; Tzamouranis D
J Hum Hypertens; 2011 Nov; 25(11):692-8. PubMed ID: 21107434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Similarity between blood pressure values assessed by auscultatory method with mercury sphygmomanometer and automated oscillometric digital device.
Pavan MV; Saura GE; Korkes HA; Nascimento KM; Madeira Neto ND; Dávila R; Rodrigues CI; Almeida FA
J Bras Nefrol; 2012 Mar; 34(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 22441181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Blood pressure randomized methodology study comparing automatic oscillometric and mercury sphygmomanometer devices: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009-2010.
Ostchega Y; Zhang G; Sorlie P; Hughes JP; Reed-Gillette DS; Nwankwo T; Yoon S
Natl Health Stat Report; 2012 Oct; (59):1-15. PubMed ID: 24984529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing the validity of oscillometric device for blood pressure measurement in a large population-based epidemiologic study.
Chen Z; Wang X; Wang Z; Zhang L; Hao G; Dong Y; Zhu M; Gao R;
J Am Soc Hypertens; 2017 Nov; 11(11):730-736.e4. PubMed ID: 29032943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Invasive and Oscillometric Blood Pressure Measurement in Obese and Nonobese Children.
Fundora MP; Beshish AG; Rao N; Berry CM; Figueroa J; McCracken C; Maher KO
Am J Hypertens; 2021 Jun; 34(6):619-625. PubMed ID: 33693473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An Assessment of the Accuracy of Home Blood Pressure Monitors When Used in Device Owners.
Ringrose JS; Polley G; McLean D; Thompson A; Morales F; Padwal R
Am J Hypertens; 2017 Jul; 30(7):683-689. PubMed ID: 28430848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of automated oscillometric versus auscultatory blood pressure measurement.
Landgraf J; Wishner SH; Kloner RA
Am J Cardiol; 2010 Aug; 106(3):386-8. PubMed ID: 20643251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can electronic sphygmomanometers be used for measurement of blood pressure at high altitudes?
Li S; Zhao X; Ba S; He F; Lam CT; Ke L; Li N; Yan LL; Li X; Wu Y
Blood Press Monit; 2012 Apr; 17(2):62-8. PubMed ID: 22343751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of Cuff Design on Auscultatory and Oscillometric Blood Pressure Measurements.
Ringrose JS; McLean D; Ao P; Yousefi F; Sankaralingam S; Millay J; Padwal R
Am J Hypertens; 2016 Sep; 29(9):1063-9. PubMed ID: 27099256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Oscillometric and auscultatory blood pressure measurement methods in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Duncombe SL; Voss C; Harris KC
J Hypertens; 2017 Feb; 35(2):213-224. PubMed ID: 27870656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Blood pressure measurement in pediatric population: comparison between automated oscillometric devices and mercury sphygmomanometers-a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Araujo-Moura K; Souza LG; Mello GL; De Moraes ACF
Eur J Pediatr; 2022 Jan; 181(1):9-22. PubMed ID: 34272985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of two sphygmomanometers that may replace the traditional mercury column in the healthcare workplace.
Elliott WJ; Young PE; DeVivo L; Feldstein J; Black HR
Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 17303984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of oscillometric devices in children and adults.
Chiolero A; Paradis G; Lambert M
Blood Press; 2010 Aug; 19(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 20156034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparisons of auscultatory hybrid and automated sphygmomanometers with mercury sphygmomanometry in hypertensive and normotensive pregnant women: parallel validation studies.
Davis GK; Roberts LM; Mangos GJ; Brown MA
J Hypertens; 2015 Mar; 33(3):499-505; discussion 505-6. PubMed ID: 25380148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Auscultatory versus oscillometric blood pressure measurement in patients with atrial fibrillation and arterial hypertension.
Šelmytė-Besusparė A; Barysienė J; Petrikonytė D; Aidietis A; Marinskis G; Laucevičius A
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2017 Mar; 17(1):87. PubMed ID: 28335730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of aneroid and oscillometric blood pressure measurements in children.
Eliasdottir SB; Steinthorsdottir SD; Indridason OS; Palsson R; Edvardsson VO
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2013 Nov; 15(11):776-83. PubMed ID: 24112661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
