434 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28238965)
1. Preoperative planning for accurate glenoid component positioning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Berhouet J; Gulotta LV; Dines DM; Craig E; Warren RF; Choi D; Chen X; Kontaxis A
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 May; 103(3):407-413. PubMed ID: 28238965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of three-dimensional planning on decision-making in total shoulder arthroplasty.
Werner BS; Hudek R; Burkhart KJ; Gohlke F
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Aug; 26(8):1477-1483. PubMed ID: 28162884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Proper benefit of a three dimensional pre-operative planning software for glenoid component positioning in total shoulder arthroplasty.
Jacquot A; Gauci MO; Chaoui J; Baba M; Deransart P; Boileau P; Mole D; Walch G
Int Orthop; 2018 Dec; 42(12):2897-2906. PubMed ID: 29968136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three dimensional patient-specific guides for guide pin positioning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: An experimental study on different glenoid types.
Mohammad Sadeghi M; Kececi EF; Kapicioglu M; Aralasmak A; Tezgel O; Basaran MA; Yildiz F; Bilsel K
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2022; 30(1):10225536221079432. PubMed ID: 35220811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of patient-specific guided implantation of the glenoid component in reversed shoulder arthroplasty.
Verborgt O; Hachem AI; Eid K; Vuylsteke K; Ferrand M; Hardy P
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 Oct; 104(6):767-772. PubMed ID: 29505820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Shoulder patient-specific guide: First experience in 10 patients indicates room for improvement.
Berhouet J; Rol M; Spiry C; Slimane M; Chevalier C; Favard L
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 Feb; 104(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 29246481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is preoperative planning effective for intraoperative glenoid implant size and type selection during anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty?
Raiss P; Walch G; Wittmann T; Athwal GS
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Oct; 29(10):2123-2127. PubMed ID: 32340791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 3-dimensionally printed patient-specific glenoid drill guides vs. standard nonspecific instrumentation: a randomized controlled trial comparing the accuracy of glenoid component placement in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.
Dasari SP; Menendez ME; Espinoza Orias A; Khan ZA; Vadhera AS; Ebersole JW; White GM; Forsythe B; Cole BJ; Nicholson GP; Garrigues GE; Verma NN
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Feb; 33(2):223-233. PubMed ID: 37774830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of 3-Dimensional Planning, Implant Templating, and Patient-Specific Instrumentation in Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.
Iannotti JP; Walker K; Rodriguez E; Patterson TE; Jun BJ; Ricchetti ET
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2019 Mar; 101(5):446-457. PubMed ID: 30845039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of patient-specific guided glenoid baseplate positioning for reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Levy JC; Everding NG; Frankle MA; Keppler LJ
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2014 Oct; 23(10):1563-7. PubMed ID: 24739791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surgeon acceptance of an initial 3D glenoid preoperative plan: rates and risk factors.
Hartzler RU; Denard PJ; Griffin JW; Werner BC; Romeo AA
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Apr; 30(4):787-794. PubMed ID: 32650080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient-specific glenoid guides provide accuracy and reproducibility in total shoulder arthroplasty.
Gauci MO; Boileau P; Baba M; Chaoui J; Walch G
Bone Joint J; 2016 Aug; 98-B(8):1080-5. PubMed ID: 27482021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Angled BIO-RSA (bony-increased offset-reverse shoulder arthroplasty): a solution for the management of glenoid bone loss and erosion.
Boileau P; Morin-Salvo N; Gauci MO; Seeto BL; Chalmers PN; Holzer N; Walch G
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Dec; 26(12):2133-2142. PubMed ID: 28735842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The reverse shoulder arthroplasty angle: a new measurement of glenoid inclination for reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Boileau P; Gauci MO; Wagner ER; Clowez G; Chaoui J; Chelli M; Walch G
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 Jul; 28(7):1281-1290. PubMed ID: 30935825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Neutral glenoid alignment in reverse shoulder arthroplasty does not guarantee decreased risk of impingement.
Berhouet J; Gulotta L; Chen X; Dines D; Warren R; Kontaxis A
J Orthop Res; 2018 Apr; 36(4):1213-1219. PubMed ID: 28898448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional preoperative planning software and a novel information transfer technology improve glenoid component positioning.
Iannotti J; Baker J; Rodriguez E; Brems J; Ricchetti E; Mesiha M; Bryan J
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 May; 96(9):e71. PubMed ID: 24806017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patient-specific instrumentation for total shoulder arthroplasty: not as accurate as it would seem.
Lau SC; Keith PPA
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Jan; 27(1):90-95. PubMed ID: 28927670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Design and development of a computer assisted glenoid implantation technique for shoulder replacement surgery.
Nguyen D; Ferreira LM; Brownhill JR; Faber KJ; Johnson JA
Comput Aided Surg; 2007 May; 12(3):152-9. PubMed ID: 17538787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improved accuracy of K-wire positioning into the glenoid vault by intraoperative 3D image intensifier-based navigation for the glenoid component in shoulder arthroplasty.
Theopold J; Pieroh P; Scharge ML; Marquaß B; Hohmann T; Josten C; Hepp P
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 Sep; 102(5):575-81. PubMed ID: 27132036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Determining glenoid component version after total shoulder arthroplasty.
Mehta MP; Vogel LA; Shiu BB; Dennis ER; Petkovic D; Levine WN; Jobin CM
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Sep; 27(9):1588-1595. PubMed ID: 29759906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
