These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28240842)

  • 1. Characteristics and Echogenicity of Clinical Ultrasound Contrast Agents: An In Vitro and In Vivo Comparison Study.
    Hyvelin JM; Gaud E; Costa M; Helbert A; Bussat P; Bettinger T; Frinking P
    J Ultrasound Med; 2017 May; 36(5):941-953. PubMed ID: 28240842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of Needle and Catheter Size on Commercially Available Ultrasound Contrast Agents.
    Eisenbrey JR; Daecher A; Kramer MR; Forsberg F
    J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Nov; 34(11):1961-8. PubMed ID: 26384606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Investigation Into the Subharmonic Response of Three Contrast Agents in Static and Dynamic Flow Environments Using a Commercially Available Diagnostic Ultrasound Scanner.
    Mayer H; Kim GW; Machado P; Eisenbrey JR; Vu T; Wallace K; Forsberg F
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2024 Nov; 50(11):1731-1738. PubMed ID: 39217026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surface Charge Measurement of SonoVue, Definity and Optison: A Comparison of Laser Doppler Electrophoresis and Micro-Electrophoresis.
    Ja'afar F; Leow CH; Garbin V; Sennoga CA; Tang MX; Seddon JM
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Nov; 41(11):2990-3000. PubMed ID: 26318559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simultaneous grayscale and subharmonic ultrasound imaging on a modified commercial scanner.
    Eisenbrey JR; Dave JK; Halldorsdottir VG; Merton DA; Machado P; Liu JB; Miller C; Gonzalez JM; Park S; Dianis S; Chalek CL; Thomenius KE; Brown DB; Navarro V; Forsberg F
    Ultrasonics; 2011 Dec; 51(8):890-7. PubMed ID: 21621239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Comparison of the Sensitivity of Contrast-Specific Imaging Modes on Clinical and Preclinical Ultrasound Scanners.
    Moran CM; Arthur C; Quaia E
    Tomography; 2022 Sep; 8(5):2285-2297. PubMed ID: 36136887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro acoustic characterization of three phospholipid ultrasound contrast agents from 12 to 43 MHz.
    Sun C; Sboros V; Butler MB; Moran CM
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Mar; 40(3):541-50. PubMed ID: 24361219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Milestone: Approval of CEUS for Diagnostic Liver Imaging in Adults and Children in the USA.
    Seitz K; Strobel D
    Ultraschall Med; 2016 Jun; 37(3):229-32. PubMed ID: 27276056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gene transfer with microbubble ultrasound and plasmid DNA into skeletal muscle of mice: comparison between commercially available microbubble contrast agents.
    Wang X; Liang HD; Dong B; Lu QL; Blomley MJ
    Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):224-9. PubMed ID: 16081853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of ultrasound pulses combined with Definity for targeted blood-brain barrier disruption: a feasibility study.
    McDannold N; Vykhodtseva N; Hynynen K
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 33(4):584-90. PubMed ID: 17337109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Acoustic Characterization and Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging of Long-Circulating Lipid-Coated Microbubbles.
    Li H; Yang Y; Zhang M; Yin L; Tu J; Guo X; Zhang D
    J Ultrasound Med; 2018 May; 37(5):1243-1256. PubMed ID: 29127707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro acoustic characterisation of four intravenous ultrasonic contrast agents at 30 MHz.
    Moran CM; Watson RJ; Fox KA; McDicken WN
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2002 Jun; 28(6):785-91. PubMed ID: 12113791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Current state of the use of sonographic contrast agents with low acoustic pressure techniques in the study of focal liver lesions.
    Borghi C; Aiani L; Sopransi M; Belloni G; Martegani A
    Radiol Med; 2004 Mar; 107(3):174-86; quiz 187-8. PubMed ID: 15031683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Comparative Study of Commercially Available Ultrasound Contrast Agents for Sub-harmonic-Aided Pressure Estimation (SHAPE) in a Bladder Phantom.
    Kalayeh K; Fowlkes JB; Yeras S; Chen A; Daignault-Newton S; Schultz WW; Sack BS
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2024 Oct; 50(10):1494-1505. PubMed ID: 39054243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Grey-scale contrast enhancement in rabbit liver with SonoVue at different doses.
    Li J; Dong B; Yu X; Wang X; Li C
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Feb; 31(2):185-90. PubMed ID: 15708457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound using SonoVue® (sulphur hexafluoride microbubbles) compared with contrast-enhanced computed tomography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for the characterisation of focal liver lesions and detection of liver metastases: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Westwood M; Joore M; Grutters J; Redekop K; Armstrong N; Lee K; Gloy V; Raatz H; Misso K; Severens J; Kleijnen J
    Health Technol Assess; 2013 Apr; 17(16):1-243. PubMed ID: 23611316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of ultrasound contrast agents on Doppler tissue velocity estimation.
    Ressner M; Brodin LA; Jansson T; Hoff L; Ask P; Janerot-Sjoberg B
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2006 Feb; 19(2):154-64. PubMed ID: 16455419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The safety of deFinity and Optison for ultrasound image enhancement: a retrospective analysis of 78,383 administered contrast doses.
    Wei K; Mulvagh SL; Carson L; Davidoff R; Gabriel R; Grimm RA; Wilson S; Fane L; Herzog CA; Zoghbi WA; Taylor R; Farrar M; Chaudhry FA; Porter TR; Irani W; Lang RM
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2008 Nov; 21(11):1202-6. PubMed ID: 18848430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography: in vitro evaluation of a second-generation ultrasound contrast agent for in vivo optimization.
    Back SJ; Edgar JC; Canning DA; Darge K
    Pediatr Radiol; 2015 Sep; 45(10):1496-505. PubMed ID: 25930084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of a Radiotherapeutic Megavoltage Beam on Ultrasound Contrast Agents.
    Collado-Lara G; Heymans SV; Godart J; D'Agostino E; D'hooge J; Van Den Abeele K; Vos HJ; de Jong N
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2021 Jul; 47(7):1857-1867. PubMed ID: 33810887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.