These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28240932)

  • 1. Testing the shared spatial representation of magnitude of auditory and visual intensity.
    Fairhurst MT; Deroy O
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Mar; 43(3):629-637. PubMed ID: 28240932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Explicit spatial compatibility is not critical to the object handle effect.
    Saccone EJ; Churches O; Nicholls ME
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Oct; 42(10):1643-53. PubMed ID: 27668425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automatic selective attention as a function of sensory modality in aging.
    Guerreiro MJ; Adam JJ; Van Gerven PW
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2012 Mar; 67(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 21798856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Common neural substrates for response selection across modalities and mapping paradigms.
    Jiang Y; Kanwisher N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Nov; 15(8):1080-94. PubMed ID: 14709228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Time attracts auditory space representation during development.
    Amadeo MB; Campus C; Gori M
    Behav Brain Res; 2019 Dec; 376():112185. PubMed ID: 31472192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial imagery relies on a sensory independent, though sensory sensitive, functional organization within the parietal cortex: a fMRI study of angle discrimination in sighted and congenitally blind individuals.
    Bonino D; Ricciardi E; Bernardi G; Sani L; Gentili C; Vecchi T; Pietrini P
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Feb; 68():59-70. PubMed ID: 25575449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Different audio spatial metric representation around the body.
    Aggius-Vella E; Campus C; Gori M
    Sci Rep; 2018 Jun; 8(1):9383. PubMed ID: 29925849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A dissociation between visual and auditory hemi-inattention: Evidence from temporal order judgements.
    Sinnett S; Juncadella M; Rafal R; Azañón E; Soto-Faraco S
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb; 45(3):552-60. PubMed ID: 16690089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Steady-state responses in MEG demonstrate information integration within but not across the auditory and visual senses.
    Giani AS; Ortiz E; Belardinelli P; Kleiner M; Preissl H; Noppeney U
    Neuroimage; 2012 Apr; 60(2):1478-89. PubMed ID: 22305992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Different mechanisms of magnitude and spatial representation for tactile and auditory modalities.
    Bollini A; Esposito D; Campus C; Gori M
    Exp Brain Res; 2021 Oct; 239(10):3123-3132. PubMed ID: 34415367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of stimulus order on comparative judgments across stimulus attributes and sensory modalities.
    Ellinghaus R; Ulrich R; Bausenhart KM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Jan; 44(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 29309193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Learning directions of objects specified by vision, spatial audition, or auditory spatial language.
    Klatzky RL; Lippa Y; Loomis JM; Golledge RG
    Learn Mem; 2002; 9(6):364-7. PubMed ID: 12464695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Altered top-down cognitive control and auditory processing in tinnitus: evidences from auditory and visual spatial stroop.
    Araneda R; De Volder AG; Deggouj N; Philippot P; Heeren A; Lacroix E; Decat M; Rombaux P; Renier L
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2015; 33(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 25420904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatial coincidence modulates the Colavita visual dominance effect.
    Koppen C; Spence C
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 May; 417(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 17408855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual-somatotopic interactions in spatial perception.
    Samad M; Shams L
    Neuroreport; 2016 Feb; 27(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 26709693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Priming the mental time line.
    Di Bono MG; Casarotti M; Priftis K; Gava L; Umiltà C; Zorzi M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Aug; 38(4):838-42. PubMed ID: 22564162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Space-independent modality-driven attentional capture in auditory, tactile and visual systems.
    Turatto M; Galfano G; Bridgeman B; Umiltà C
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Apr; 155(3):301-10. PubMed ID: 14658019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Backward spatial perception can be augmented through a novel visual-to-auditory sensory substitution algorithm.
    Netzer O; Heimler B; Shur A; Behor T; Amedi A
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jun; 11(1):11944. PubMed ID: 34099756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatiotemporal Relationships among Audiovisual Stimuli Modulate Auditory Facilitation of Visual Target Discrimination.
    Li Q; Yang H; Sun F; Wu J
    Perception; 2015 Mar; 44(3):232-42. PubMed ID: 26562250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence for crossmodal interactions across depth on target localisation performance in a spatial array.
    Chan JS; Maguinness C; Lisiecka D; Setti A; Newell FN
    Perception; 2012; 41(7):757-73. PubMed ID: 23155729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.