These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28240980)

  • 1. Potential Benefits of an Integrated Electric-Acoustic Sound Processor with Children: A Preliminary Report.
    Wolfe J; Neumann S; Schafer E; Marsh M; Wood M; Baker RS
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Feb; 28(2):127-140. PubMed ID: 28240980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
    Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of hearing aid settings for electric-acoustic stimulation.
    Dillon MT; Buss E; Pillsbury HC; Adunka OF; Buchman CA; Adunka MC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 24828214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acceptance and Benefits of Electro-Acoustic Stimulation for Conventional-Length Electrode Arrays.
    Spitzer ER; Waltzman SB; Landsberger DM; Friedmann DR
    Audiol Neurootol; 2021; 26(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 32721977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech perception in noise: Impact of directional microphones in users of combined electric-acoustic stimulation.
    Weissgerber T; Stöver T; Baumann U
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0213251. PubMed ID: 30840668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech Recognition and Subjective Hearing Abilities for Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Users With Unilateral Hearing Loss.
    Dillon MT; Buss E; Thompson NJ; Richter ME; Davis AG; Overton AB; Rooth MA; Canfarotta MW; Selleck AM; Dedmon MM; Brown KD
    Otol Neurotol; 2024 Oct; 45(9):1006-1011. PubMed ID: 39165094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bilateral electric acoustic stimulation: a comparison of partial and deep cochlear electrode insertion. A longitudinal case study.
    Kleine Punte A; Vermeire K; Van de Heyning P
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2010; 67():144-152. PubMed ID: 19955731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improved speech reception and sound quality with the DUET2 audio processor for electric acoustic stimulation.
    Kleine Punte A; Mertens G; Cochet E; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2015; 135(10):1022-9. PubMed ID: 26073650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Outcomes in Children.
    Park LR; Teagle HFB; Gagnon E; Woodard J; Brown KD
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):849-857. PubMed ID: 30252685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
    Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
    Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Integration of acoustic and electric hearing is better in the same ear than across ears.
    Fu QJ; Galvin JJ; Wang X
    Sci Rep; 2017 Oct; 7(1):12500. PubMed ID: 28970567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Combined Electric and Acoustic Stimulation With Hearing Preservation: Effect of Cochlear Implant Low-Frequency Cutoff on Speech Understanding and Perceived Listening Difficulty.
    Gifford RH; Davis TJ; Sunderhaus LW; Menapace C; Buck B; Crosson J; O'Neill L; Beiter A; Segel P
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):539-553. PubMed ID: 28301392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electric-Acoustic Stimulation After Reimplantation: Hearing Preservation and Speech Perception.
    Thompson NJ; Dillon MT; Bucker AL; King ER; Pillsbury HC; Brown KD
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Feb; 40(2):e94-e98. PubMed ID: 30624400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of Additional Low-Pass-Filtered Speech on Listening Effort for Noise-Band-Vocoded Speech in Quiet and in Noise.
    Pals C; Sarampalis A; van Dijk M; Başkent D
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 29757801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Benefit of a commercially available cochlear implant processor with dual-microphone beamforming: a multi-center study.
    Wolfe J; Parkinson A; Schafer EC; Gilden J; Rehwinkel K; Mansanares J; Coughlan E; Wright J; Torres J; Gannaway S
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):553-60. PubMed ID: 22588233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimizing maps for electric acoustic stimulation users.
    Yoon YS; Shin YR; Kim JM; Coltisor A; Chun YM
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 May; 20(3):106-115. PubMed ID: 30694120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Combined electric and acoustic hearing performance with Zebra® speech processor: speech reception, place, and temporal coding evaluation.
    Vaerenberg B; Péan V; Lesbros G; De Ceulaer G; Schauwers K; Daemers K; Gnansia D; Govaerts PJ
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2013 Jun; 14(3):150-7. PubMed ID: 23321588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech Perception With Combined Electric-Acoustic Stimulation: A Simulation and Model Comparison.
    Rader T; Adel Y; Fastl H; Baumann U
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):e314-25. PubMed ID: 25989069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcomes and Predictive Factors of Electroacoustic Stimulation Rehabilitation in Children With Limited Low-Frequency Hearing.
    Nam GS; Song MH; Choi JY; Jung J
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Oct; 40(9):e894-e900. PubMed ID: 31498289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.