933 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28241261)
21. Wide local excision vs. Mohs Tübingen technique in the treatment of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a two-centre retrospective study and literature review.
Veronese F; Boggio P; Tiberio R; Gattoni M; Fava P; Caliendo V; Colombo E; Savoia P
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2017 Dec; 31(12):2069-2076. PubMed ID: 28573714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Nail Unit Melanoma In Situ Treated With Mohs Micrographic Surgery.
Matsumoto A; Strickland N; Nijhawan RI; Srivastava D
Dermatol Surg; 2021 Jan; 47(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 32796325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Mohs micrographic surgery versus wide local excision for eyelid melanoma: An analysis of a national database.
Ramachandran V; Phan K
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 Dec; 75(12):4410-4415. PubMed ID: 36257889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Local Recurrence of Melanoma Is Higher After Wide Local Excision Versus Mohs Micrographic Surgery or Staged Excision: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Pride RLD; Miller CJ; Murad MH; Erwin PJ; Brewer JD
Dermatol Surg; 2022 Feb; 48(2):164-170. PubMed ID: 34889212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A comparison between Mohs micrographic surgery and wide surgical excision for the treatment of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans.
Gloster HM; Harris KR; Roenigk RK
J Am Acad Dermatol; 1996 Jul; 35(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 8682970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Surgical margins for melanoma in situ.
Kunishige JH; Brodland DG; Zitelli JA
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2012 Mar; 66(3):438-44. PubMed ID: 22196979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Mohs micrographic surgery is accurate 95.1% of the time for melanoma in situ: a prospective study of 167 cases.
Bene NI; Healy C; Coldiron BM
Dermatol Surg; 2008 May; 34(5):660-4. PubMed ID: 18261099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Localized sebaceous carcinoma treatment: Wide local excision verses Mohs micrographic surgery.
Elias ML; Skula SR; Behbahani S; Lambert WC; Schwartz RA
Dermatol Ther; 2020 Nov; 33(6):e13991. PubMed ID: 32645237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Low recurrence rates for in situ and invasive melanomas using Mohs micrographic surgery with melanoma antigen recognized by T cells 1 (MART-1) immunostaining: tissue processing methodology to optimize pathologic staging and margin assessment.
Etzkorn JR; Sobanko JF; Elenitsas R; Newman JG; Goldbach H; Shin TM; Miller CJ
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2015 May; 72(5):840-50. PubMed ID: 25774012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. No Recurrence in Primary Invasive Stage 1a and 1b Melanoma and Melanoma in Situ Treated With Serial Disk Staged Excision.
Ahn GS; Pousti B; Singh G; Elsensohn A; Jiang SIB
Dermatol Surg; 2022 Mar; 48(3):276-282. PubMed ID: 34935746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Invasive Melanoma and Melanoma in Situ Treated With Modified Mohs Micrographic Surgery With En Face Permanent Sectioning: A 10-Year Retrospective Review.
Heath M; Woody M; Leitenberger J; Latour E; Bar A
Dermatol Surg; 2020 Aug; 46(8):1004-1013. PubMed ID: 31714384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Treatment of Cutaneous Melanoma of the Head and Neck With Wide Local Excision Versus Mohs.
Namin AW; Oudin EM; Tassone PT; Galloway TLI; Dooley LM; Zitsch RP
Laryngoscope; 2021 Nov; 131(11):2490-2496. PubMed ID: 33844289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Factors Influencing General Dermatologists When Referring Patients With Head and Neck Melanoma for Mohs Micrographic Surgery: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey.
Neill BC; Siscos SM; Bar AA; Seger EW; Latour E; Tolkachjov SN
Dermatol Surg; 2023 May; 49(5):451-455. PubMed ID: 36989088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Differences in sentinel lymph node biopsy utilization in eligible melanoma patients treated with Mohs micrographic surgery or wide local excision: A population-based logistic regression model and survival analysis.
Knackstedt TJ
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2023 Apr; 88(4):848-855. PubMed ID: 36368376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Cutaneous head and neck melanoma treated with Mohs micrographic surgery.
Bricca GM; Brodland DG; Ren D; Zitelli JA
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2005 Jan; 52(1):92-100. PubMed ID: 15627086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The Current State of Mohs Surgery for the Treatment of Melanoma: A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Survey of Mohs Surgeons.
Siscos SM; Neill BC; Seger EW; Hooton TA; Hocker TLH
Dermatol Surg; 2020 Oct; 46(10):1267-1271. PubMed ID: 32740213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Wide local excision, Mohs micrographic surgery, and reconstructive options for treatment of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans of the breast: A retrospective case series from Mayo Clinic.
Saifuddin H; Yan M; Jakub J; Martinez-Jorge J; Roenigk R; Vijayasekaran A
World J Surg Oncol; 2023 May; 21(1):141. PubMed ID: 37147611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Outcomes for Invasive Melanomas Treated With Mohs Micrographic Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Degesys CA; Powell HB; Hsia LB; Merritt BG
Dermatol Surg; 2019 Feb; 45(2):223-228. PubMed ID: 30199430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Mohs micrographic surgery versus wide local excision for sebaceous adenocarcinoma of the eyelid : Analysis of a national database.
Phan K; Loya A
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Jun; 72(6):1007-1011. PubMed ID: 30894313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Modified Mohs micrographic surgery for periocular melanoma and melanoma in situ: long-term experience at Scripps Clinic.
Shumaker PR; Kelley B; Swann MH; Greenway HT
Dermatol Surg; 2009 Aug; 35(8):1263-70. PubMed ID: 19438663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
