166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28241362)
1. Adjusted Analyses in Studies Addressing Therapy and Harm: Users' Guides to the Medical Literature.
Agoritsas T; Merglen A; Shah ND; O'Donnell M; Guyatt GH
JAMA; 2017 Feb; 317(7):748-759. PubMed ID: 28241362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of observational studies in the presence of treatment selection bias: effects of invasive cardiac management on AMI survival using propensity score and instrumental variable methods.
Stukel TA; Fisher ES; Wennberg DE; Alter DA; Gottlieb DJ; Vermeulen MJ
JAMA; 2007 Jan; 297(3):278-85. PubMed ID: 17227979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Randomization, matching, and propensity scores in the design and analysis of experimental studies with measured baseline covariates.
Loux TM
Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(4):558-70. PubMed ID: 25384851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can statistic adjustment of OR minimize the potential confounding bias for meta-analysis of case-control study? A secondary data analysis.
Liu T; Nie X; Wu Z; Zhang Y; Feng G; Cai S; Lv Y; Peng X
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):179. PubMed ID: 29284414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of instrumental variable analysis using a new instrument with risk adjustment methods to reduce confounding by indication.
Fang G; Brooks JM; Chrischilles EA
Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Jun; 175(11):1142-51. PubMed ID: 22510277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Instrumental variable analysis.
Stel VS; Dekker FW; Zoccali C; Jager KJ
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2013 Jul; 28(7):1694-9. PubMed ID: 22833620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Propensity score methods for creating covariate balance in observational studies].
Pattanayak CW; Rubin DB; Zell ER
Rev Esp Cardiol; 2011 Oct; 64(10):897-903. PubMed ID: 21872981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Propensity Score Methods: Theory and Practice for Anesthesia Research.
Schulte PJ; Mascha EJ
Anesth Analg; 2018 Oct; 127(4):1074-1084. PubMed ID: 29750691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Examination of the treatment selection process in a multicenter observational study.
Anstrom KJ; Brennan JM; Eisenstein EL; Federspiel JJ; Dai D; Peterson ED; Douglas PS
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2014 Sep; 7(5):764-9. PubMed ID: 25116898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correction of confounding bias in non-randomized studies by appropriate weighting.
Schmoor C; Gall C; Stampf S; Graf E
Biom J; 2011 Mar; 53(2):369-87. PubMed ID: 21308726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimators and confidence intervals for the marginal odds ratio using logistic regression and propensity score stratification.
Stampf S; Graf E; Schmoor C; Schumacher M
Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):760-9. PubMed ID: 20213703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. When do confounding by indication and inadequate risk adjustment bias critical care studies? A simulation study.
Sjoding MW; Luo K; Miller MA; Iwashyna TJ
Crit Care; 2015 Apr; 19(1):195. PubMed ID: 25925165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of balancing scores using the ANCOVA approach for estimating average treatment effect: a simulation study.
Tu C; Koh WY
J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(3):508-515. PubMed ID: 30561245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evidence from nonrandomized studies: a case study on the estimation of causal effects.
Schmoor C; Caputo A; Schumacher M
Am J Epidemiol; 2008 May; 167(9):1120-9. PubMed ID: 18334500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An overview of the objectives of and the approaches to propensity score analyses.
Heinze G; Jüni P
Eur Heart J; 2011 Jul; 32(14):1704-8. PubMed ID: 21362706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. IRINI: random group allocation of multiple prognostic factors.
Kasturi J; Geisler JG; Liu J; Kirchner T; Amaratunga D; Lubomirski M
Contemp Clin Trials; 2011 May; 32(3):372-81. PubMed ID: 21187163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance evaluation of regression splines for propensity score adjustment in post-market safety analysis with multiple treatments.
Tian Y; Baro E; Zhang R
J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(5):810-821. PubMed ID: 31502924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. High-dimensional propensity score algorithm in comparative effectiveness research with time-varying interventions.
Neugebauer R; Schmittdiel JA; Zhu Z; Rassen JA; Seeger JD; Schneeweiss S
Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(5):753-81. PubMed ID: 25488047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Simulation study comparing exposure matching with regression adjustment in an observational safety setting with group sequential monitoring.
Stratton KG; Cook AJ; Jackson LA; Nelson JC
Stat Med; 2015 Mar; 34(7):1117-33. PubMed ID: 25510526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The reverse propensity score to detect selection bias and correct for baseline imbalances.
Berger VW
Stat Med; 2005 Sep; 24(18):2777-87. PubMed ID: 15981305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
