These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28241798)

  • 1. Leveraging the EHR4CR platform to support patient inclusion in academic studies: challenges and lessons learned.
    Girardeau Y; Doods J; Zapletal E; Chatellier G; Daniel C; Burgun A; Dugas M; Rance B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Feb; 17(1):36. PubMed ID: 28241798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Piloting the EHR4CR feasibility platform across Europe.
    Doods J; Bache R; McGilchrist M; Daniel C; Dugas M; Fritz F;
    Methods Inf Med; 2014; 53(4):264-8. PubMed ID: 24954881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Federated electronic health records research technology to support clinical trial protocol optimization: Evidence from EHR4CR and the InSite platform.
    Claerhout B; Kalra D; Mueller C; Singh G; Ammour N; Meloni L; Blomster J; Hopley M; Kafatos G; Garvey A; Kuhn P; Lewi M; Vannieuwenhuyse B; Marchal B; Patel K; Schindler C; Sundgren M
    J Biomed Inform; 2019 Feb; 90():103090. PubMed ID: 30611012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Business analysis for a sustainable, multi-stakeholder ecosystem for leveraging the Electronic Health Records for Clinical Research (EHR4CR) platform in Europe.
    Dupont D; Beresniak A; Sundgren M; Schmidt A; Ainsworth J; Coorevits P; Kalra D; Dewispelaere M; De Moor G
    Int J Med Inform; 2017 Jan; 97():341-352. PubMed ID: 27919393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using electronic health records for clinical research: the case of the EHR4CR project.
    De Moor G; Sundgren M; Kalra D; Schmidt A; Dugas M; Claerhout B; Karakoyun T; Ohmann C; Lastic PY; Ammour N; Kush R; Dupont D; Cuggia M; Daniel C; Thienpont G; Coorevits P
    J Biomed Inform; 2015 Feb; 53():162-73. PubMed ID: 25463966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-benefit assessment of using electronic health records data for clinical research versus current practices: Contribution of the Electronic Health Records for Clinical Research (EHR4CR) European Project.
    Beresniak A; Schmidt A; Proeve J; Bolanos E; Patel N; Ammour N; Sundgren M; Ericson M; Karakoyun T; Coorevits P; Kalra D; De Moor G; Dupont D
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2016 Jan; 46():85-91. PubMed ID: 26600286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Electronic Healthcare Record for Clinical Research (EHR4CR) information model and terminology.
    Ouagne D; Hussain S; Sadou E; Jaulent MC; Daniel C
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 180():534-8. PubMed ID: 22874248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficiency and effectiveness evaluation of an automated multi-country patient count cohort system.
    Soto-Rey I; Trinczek B; Girardeau Y; Zapletal E; Ammour N; Doods J; Dugas M; Fritz F
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 May; 15():44. PubMed ID: 25928269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electronic health records (EHRs) in clinical research and platform trials: Application of the innovative EHR-based methods developed by EU-PEARL.
    Lombardo G; Couvert C; Kose M; Begum A; Spiertz C; Worrell C; Hasselbaink D; Didden EM; Sforzini L; Todorovic M; Lewi M; Brown M; Vaterkowski M; Gullet N; Amasi-Hartoonian N; Griffon N; Pais R; Rodriguez Navarro S; Kremer A; Maes C; Tan EH; Moinat M; Ferrer JG; Pariante CM; Kalra D; Ammour N; Kalko S
    J Biomed Inform; 2023 Dec; 148():104553. PubMed ID: 38000766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of electronic health record system functionalities to support the patient recruitment process in clinical trials.
    Schreiweis B; Trinczek B; Köpcke F; Leusch T; Majeed RW; Wenk J; Bergh B; Ohmann C; Röhrig R; Dugas M; Prokosch HU
    Int J Med Inform; 2014 Nov; 83(11):860-8. PubMed ID: 25189709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Value of hospital electronic health records for clinical research: contribution of the European project EHR4CR].
    Dupont D; Beresniak A; Kalra D; Coorevits P; De Moor G
    Med Sci (Paris); 2018 Nov; 34(11):972-977. PubMed ID: 30526834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Leveraging Real-World Data for the Selection of Relevant Eligibility Criteria for the Implementation of Electronic Recruitment Support in Clinical Trials.
    Melzer G; Maiwald T; Prokosch HU; Ganslandt T
    Appl Clin Inform; 2021 Jan; 12(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 33440429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A European inventory of common electronic health record data elements for clinical trial feasibility.
    Doods J; Botteri F; Dugas M; Fritz F;
    Trials; 2014 Jan; 15():18. PubMed ID: 24410735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using Electronic Health Records to Support Clinical Trials: A Report on Stakeholder Engagement for EHR4CR.
    McCowan C; Thomson E; Szmigielski CA; Kalra D; Sullivan FM; Prokosch HU; Dugas M; Ford I
    Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():707891. PubMed ID: 26539523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. User Satisfaction Evaluation of the EHR4CR Query Builder: A Multisite Patient Count Cohort System.
    Soto-Rey I; N'Dja A; Cunningham J; Newe A; Trinczek B; Lafitte C; Sedlmayr B; Fritz F
    Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():801436. PubMed ID: 26539525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A European inventory of data elements for patient recruitment.
    Doods J; Lafitte C; Ulliac-Sagnes N; Proeve J; Botteri F; Walls R; Sykes A; Dugas M; Fritz F
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 210():506-10. PubMed ID: 25991199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Web-based multi-site feasibility questionnaire tool.
    Soto-Rey I; Trinczek B; Amo JI; Bauselas J; Dugas M; Fritz F
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 212():88-93. PubMed ID: 26063262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An eligibility criteria query language for heterogeneous data warehouses.
    Bache R; Taweel A; Miles S; Delaney BC
    Methods Inf Med; 2015; 54(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 24985949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Protocol feasibility workflow using an automated multi-country patient cohort system.
    Soto-Rey I; Trinczek B; Karakoyun T; Dugas M; Fritz F
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2014; 205():985-9. PubMed ID: 25160335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computable Phenotype Implementation for a National, Multicenter Pragmatic Clinical Trial: Lessons Learned From ADAPTABLE.
    Ahmad FS; Ricket IM; Hammill BG; Eskenazi L; Robertson HR; Curtis LH; Dobi CD; Girotra S; Haynes K; Kizer JR; Kripalani S; Roe MT; Roumie CL; Waitman R; Jones WS; Weiner MG
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2020 Jun; 13(6):e006292. PubMed ID: 32466729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.