These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28242391)

  • 1. Validation of image cytometry for sperm concentration measurement: Comparison with manual counting of 4010 human semen samples.
    Egeberg Palme DL; Johannsen TH; Petersen JH; Skakkebæk NE; Juul A; Jørgensen N; Almstrup K
    Clin Chim Acta; 2017 May; 468():114-119. PubMed ID: 28242391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Image cytometer method for automated assessment of human spermatozoa concentration.
    Egeberg DL; Kjaerulff S; Hansen C; Petersen JH; Glensbjerg M; Skakkebaek NE; Jørgensen N; Almstrup K
    Andrology; 2013 Jul; 1(4):615-23. PubMed ID: 23606456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A multicenter study evaluating the flowcytometric-based kit for semen analysis.
    Shai S; Roudebush W; Powers D; Dirnfeld M; Lamb DJ
    Fertil Steril; 2005 Apr; 83(4):1034-8. PubMed ID: 15820817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is flow cytometry really adapted to the determination of sperm concentration?
    Lu JC; Chen F; Xu HR; Wu YM; Xia XY; Huang YF; Lu NQ
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2007; 67(4):394-401. PubMed ID: 17558894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of Makler counting chamber and improved Neubauer hemocytometer in sperm concentration measurement.
    Sukcharoen N; Ngeamjirawat J; Chanprasit Y; Aribarg A
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1994 Sep; 77(9):471-6. PubMed ID: 7706966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of computer-assisted semen analysis (CASA) with IDENT stain to determine sperm concentration.
    Zinaman MJ; Uhler ML; Vertuno E; Fisher SG; Clegg ED
    J Androl; 1996; 17(3):288-92. PubMed ID: 8792219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In search of an accurate and rapid method for sperm counting.
    Haugen TB
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2007; 67(4):436-8. PubMed ID: 17558899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of the sperm class analyser CASA system for sperm counting in a busy diagnostic semen analysis laboratory.
    Dearing CG; Kilburn S; Lindsay KS
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2014 Mar; 17(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 24359435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of the FACSCount AF system for determination of sperm concentration in boar semen.
    Hansen C; Christensen P; Stryhn H; Hedeboe AM; Rode M; Boe-Hansen G
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2002 Dec; 37(6):330-4. PubMed ID: 12464070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of flow cytometric methods to measure human sperm concentration.
    Eustache F; Jouannet P; Auger J
    J Androl; 2001; 22(4):558-67. PubMed ID: 11451352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computerized semen analysis with sperm tail detection.
    Neuwinger J; Behre HM; Nieschlag E
    Hum Reprod; 1990 Aug; 5(6):719-23. PubMed ID: 2254406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automation is the key to standardized semen analysis using the automated SQA-V sperm quality analyzer.
    Agarwal A; Sharma RK
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Jan; 87(1):156-62. PubMed ID: 17081526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Manual versus computer-automated semen analyses. Part II. Determination of the working range of a computer-automated semen analyzer.
    Johnson JE; Boone WR; Blackhurst DW
    Fertil Steril; 1996 Jan; 65(1):156-9. PubMed ID: 8557133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determination of sperm concentration using flow cytometry with simultaneous analysis of sperm plasma membrane integrity in zebrafish Danio rerio.
    Yang H; Daly J; Tiersch TR
    Cytometry A; 2016 Apr; 89(4):350-6. PubMed ID: 26580311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of FACSCount AF system, Improved Neubauer hemocytometer, Corning 254 photometer, SpermVision, UltiMate and NucleoCounter SP-100 for determination of sperm concentration of boar semen.
    Hansen C; Vermeiden T; Vermeiden JP; Simmet C; Day BC; Feitsma H
    Theriogenology; 2006 Dec; 66(9):2188-94. PubMed ID: 16920186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of automated imaging and analysis technology for the detection of aneuploidy in human sperm.
    Carrell DT; Emery BR
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Aug; 90(2):434-7. PubMed ID: 17936284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of a fluorescent computer-assisted spermatozoal quantification method and a comparison of results for manual counting with a haemocytometer and computer-assisted semen analysis in dogs.
    Watts J
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2019 Nov; 54(11):1477-1488. PubMed ID: 31441976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The precision and accuracy of six different methods to determine sperm concentration.
    Prathalingam NS; Holt WW; Revell SG; Jones S; Watson PF
    J Androl; 2006; 27(2):257-62. PubMed ID: 16330662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the accuracy of different sperm counting chambers by performing strict counts of photographed beads.
    Shiran E; Stoller J; Blumenfeld Z; Feigin PD; Makler A
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 1995 Aug; 12(7):434-42. PubMed ID: 8574071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic accuracy of an initial azoospermic reading compared with results of post-centrifugation semen analysis after vasectomy.
    Steward B; Hays M; Sokal D
    J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):2119-23. PubMed ID: 18804227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.