These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28244218)

  • 1. Improved detection of clinically relevant wound bacteria using autofluorescence image-guided sampling in diabetic foot ulcers.
    Ottolino-Perry K; Chamma E; Blackmore KM; Lindvere-Teene L; Starr D; Tapang K; Rosen CF; Pitcher B; Panzarella T; Linden R; DaCosta RS
    Int Wound J; 2017 Oct; 14(5):833-841. PubMed ID: 28244218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Point-of-care autofluorescence imaging for real-time sampling and treatment guidance of bioburden in chronic wounds: first-in-human results.
    DaCosta RS; Kulbatski I; Lindvere-Teene L; Starr D; Blackmore K; Silver JI; Opoku J; Wu YC; Medeiros PJ; Xu W; Xu L; Wilson BC; Rosen C; Linden R
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0116623. PubMed ID: 25790480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy of a bacterial fluorescence imaging device in an outpatient wound care clinic: a pilot study.
    Hurley CM; McClusky P; Sugrue RM; Clover JA; Kelly JE
    J Wound Care; 2019 Jul; 28(7):438-443. PubMed ID: 31295094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic Accuracy of Point-of-Care Fluorescence Imaging for the Detection of Bacterial Burden in Wounds: Results from the 350-Patient Fluorescence Imaging Assessment and Guidance Trial.
    Le L; Baer M; Briggs P; Bullock N; Cole W; DiMarco D; Hamil R; Harrell K; Kasper M; Li W; Patel K; Sabo M; Thibodeaux K; Serena TE
    Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle); 2021 Mar; 10(3):123-136. PubMed ID: 32870774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Handheld fluorescence imaging device detects subclinical wound infection in an asymptomatic patient with chronic diabetic foot ulcer: a case report.
    Wu YC; Smith M; Chu A; Lindvere-Teene L; Starr D; Tapang K; Shekhman R; Wong O; Linden R; DaCosta RS
    Int Wound J; 2016 Aug; 13(4):449-53. PubMed ID: 25907362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Concordance in diabetic foot ulceration: a cross-sectional study of agreement between wound swabbing and tissue sampling in infected ulcers.
    Nelson EA; Wright-Hughes A; Brown S; Lipsky BA; Backhouse M; Bhogal M; Ndosi M; Reynolds C; Sykes G; Dowson C; Edmonds M; Vowden P; Jude EB; Dickie T; Nixon J
    Health Technol Assess; 2016 Nov; 20(82):1-176. PubMed ID: 27827300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Real-time bacterial fluorescence imaging accurately identifies wounds with moderate-to-heavy bacterial burden.
    Serena TE; Harrell K; Serena L; Yaakov RA
    J Wound Care; 2019 Jun; 28(6):346-357. PubMed ID: 31166857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of a bacterial fluorescence imaging device: wound measurement, bacterial detection and targeted debridement.
    Raizman R; Dunham D; Lindvere-Teene L; Jones LM; Tapang K; Linden R; Rennie MY
    J Wound Care; 2019 Dec; 28(12):824-834. PubMed ID: 31825778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Autofluorescence imaging device for real-time detection and tracking of pathogenic bacteria in a mouse skin wound model: preclinical feasibility studies.
    Wu YC; Kulbatski I; Medeiros PJ; Maeda A; Bu J; Xu L; Chen Y; DaCosta RS
    J Biomed Opt; 2014 Aug; 19(8):085002. PubMed ID: 25089944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High-Resolution Spectral Analysis Accurately Identifies the Bacterial Signature in Infected Chronic Foot Ulcers in People With Diabetes.
    Poosapadi Arjunan S; Tint AN; Aliahmad B; Kumar DK; Shukla R; Miller J; Zajac JD; Wang G; Viswanathan R; Ekinci EI
    Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2018 Jun; 17(2):78-86. PubMed ID: 30012069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The clinical efficacy of two semi-quantitative wound-swabbing techniques in identifying the causative organism(s) in infected cutaneous wounds.
    Angel DE; Lloyd P; Carville K; Santamaria N
    Int Wound J; 2011 Apr; 8(2):176-85. PubMed ID: 21303456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detection of bacteria in burn wounds with a novel handheld autofluorescence wound imaging device: a pilot study.
    Pijpe A; Ozdemir Y; Sinnige JC; Kwa KAA; Middelkoop E; Meij-de Vries A
    J Wound Care; 2019 Aug; 28(8):548-554. PubMed ID: 31393796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sample procurement for cultures of infected wounds: a systematic review.
    Copeland-Halperin LR; Kaminsky AJ; Bluefeld N; Miraliakbari R
    J Wound Care; 2016 Apr; 25(4):S4-6, S8-10. PubMed ID: 27068349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. CODIFI (Concordance in Diabetic Foot Ulcer Infection): a cross-sectional study of wound swab versus tissue sampling in infected diabetic foot ulcers in England.
    Nelson A; Wright-Hughes A; Backhouse MR; Lipsky BA; Nixon J; Bhogal MS; Reynolds C; Brown S;
    BMJ Open; 2018 Jan; 8(1):e019437. PubMed ID: 29391370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical and Antimicrobial Efficacy of a Silver Foam Dressing With Silicone Adhesive in Diabetic Foot Ulcers With Mild Infection.
    Lázaro-Martínez JL; Álvaro-Afonso FJ; Sevillano-Fernández D; Molines-Barroso RJ; García-Álvarez Y; García-Morales E
    Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2019 Sep; 18(3):269-278. PubMed ID: 31379224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Point-of-care fluorescence imaging reveals extent of bacterial load in diabetic foot ulcers.
    Armstrong DG; Edmonds ME; Serena TE
    Int Wound J; 2023 Feb; 20(2):554-566. PubMed ID: 36708275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Significance of bacteria detection with filter paper method on diagnosis of diabetic foot wound infection].
    Zou XH; Zhu YP; Ren GQ; Li GC; Zhang J; Zou LJ; Feng ZB; Li BH
    Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi; 2017 Feb; 33(2):83-88. PubMed ID: 28219141
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Swab cultures accurately identify bacterial pathogens in diabetic foot wounds not involving bone.
    Slater RA; Lazarovitch T; Boldur I; Ramot Y; Buchs A; Weiss M; Hindi A; Rapoport MJ
    Diabet Med; 2004 Jul; 21(7):705-9. PubMed ID: 15209762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risk factors and healing impact of multidrug-resistant bacteria in diabetic foot ulcers.
    Richard JL; Sotto A; Jourdan N; Combescure C; Vannereau D; Rodier M; Lavigne JP;
    Diabetes Metab; 2008 Sep; 34(4 Pt 1):363-9. PubMed ID: 18632297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microbial Community Distribution and Core Microbiome in Successive Wound Grades of Individuals with Diabetic Foot Ulcers.
    Jnana A; Muthuraman V; Varghese VK; Chakrabarty S; Murali TS; Ramachandra L; Shenoy KR; Rodrigues GS; Prasad SS; Dendukuri D; Morschhauser A; Nestler J; Peter H; Bier FF; Satyamoorthy K
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2020 Mar; 86(6):. PubMed ID: 31924616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.