254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28244420)
1. Is Dose Deformation-Invariance Hypothesis Verified in Prostate IGRT?
Simon A; Le Maitre A; Nassef M; Rigaud B; Castelli J; Acosta O; Haigron P; Lafond C; de Crevoisier R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Mar; 97(4):830-838. PubMed ID: 28244420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A feature alignment score for online cone-beam CT-based image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
Hargrave C; Deegan T; Poulsen M; Bednarz T; Harden F; Mengersen K
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):2898-2911. PubMed ID: 29772077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Associations between volume changes and spatial dose metrics for the urinary bladder during local versus pelvic irradiation for prostate cancer.
Casares-Magaz O; Moiseenko V; Hopper A; Pettersson NJ; Thor M; Knopp R; Deasy JO; Muren LP; Einck J
Acta Oncol; 2017 Jun; 56(6):884-890. PubMed ID: 28401808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dosimetric and volumetric changes in the rectum and bladder in patients receiving CBCT-guided prostate IMRT: analysis based on daily CBCT dose calculation.
Pearson D; Gill SK; Campbell N; Reddy K
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 17(6):107-117. PubMed ID: 27929486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does rectum and bladder dose vary during the course of image-guided radiotherapy in the postprostatectomy setting?
Akin M; Öksüz DC; Iktueren B; Ambarcioglu P; Karacam S; Koca S; Dincbas FÖ
Tumori; 2014; 100(5):529-35. PubMed ID: 25343548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment and management of interfractional variations in daily diagnostic-quality-CT guided prostate-bed irradiation after prostatectomy.
Liu F; Ahunbay E; Lawton C; Li XA
Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031710. PubMed ID: 24593714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fractionated changes in prostate cancer radiotherapy using cone-beam computed tomography.
Huang TC; Chou KT; Yang SN; Chang CK; Liang JA; Zhang G
Med Dosim; 2015; 40(3):222-5. PubMed ID: 25683282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of online/offline image guidance/adaptation approaches for prostate cancer radiation therapy.
Qin A; Sun Y; Liang J; Yan D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Apr; 91(5):1026-33. PubMed ID: 25832693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing prostate, bladder and rectal doses during image guided radiation therapy--need for plan adaptation?
Varadhan R; Hui SK; Way S; Nisi K
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 10(3):56-74. PubMed ID: 19692971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does the planning dose-volume histogram represent treatment doses in image-guided prostate radiation therapy? Assessment with cone-beam computerised tomography scans.
Hatton JA; Greer PB; Tang C; Wright P; Capp A; Gupta S; Parker J; Wratten C; Denham JW
Radiother Oncol; 2011 Feb; 98(2):162-8. PubMed ID: 21295873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Testicular doses in image-guided radiotherapy of prostate cancer.
Deng J; Chen Z; Yu JB; Roberts KB; Peschel RE; Nath R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Jan; 82(1):e39-47. PubMed ID: 21489702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetric and radiobiological consequences of computed tomography-guided adaptive strategies for intensity modulated radiation therapy of the prostate.
Battista JJ; Johnson C; Turnbull D; Kempe J; Bzdusek K; Van Dyk J; Bauman G
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Dec; 87(5):874-80. PubMed ID: 23978708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A study on planning organ at risk volume for the rectum using cone beam computed tomography in the treatment of prostate cancer.
Prabhakar R; Oates R; Jones D; Kron T; Cramb J; Foroudi F; Geso M; Gill S
Med Dosim; 2014; 39(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24412028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predicting rectal and bladder overdose during the course of prostate radiotherapy using dose-volume data from initial treatment fractions.
Murthy V; Shukla P; Adurkar P; Master Z; Mahantshetty U; Shrivastava S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Sep; 84(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 22300567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimation of rectal dose using daily megavoltage cone-beam computed tomography and deformable image registration.
Akino Y; Yoshioka Y; Fukuda S; Maruoka S; Takahashi Y; Yagi M; Mizuno H; Isohashi F; Ogawa K
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Nov; 87(3):602-8. PubMed ID: 24074934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantification of dose uncertainties in cumulated dose estimation compared to planned dose in prostate IMRT.
Nassef M; Simon A; Cazoulat G; Duménil A; Blay C; Lafond C; Acosta O; Balosso J; Haigron P; de Crevoisier R
Radiother Oncol; 2016 Apr; 119(1):129-36. PubMed ID: 26993416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Probabilistic dose distribution from interfractional motion in carbon ion radiation therapy for prostate cancer shows rectum sparing with moderate target coverage degradation.
Bridges D; Kawamura H; Kanai T
PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0203289. PubMed ID: 30169520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of daily imaging on plan quality and normal tissue toxicity for prostate cancer radiotherapy.
Bell K; Heitfeld M; Licht N; Rübe C; Dzierma Y
Radiat Oncol; 2017 Jan; 12(1):7. PubMed ID: 28069053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monte Carlo calculation of imaging doses from diagnostic multidetector CT and kilovoltage cone-beam CT as part of prostate cancer treatment plans.
Ding A; Gu J; Trofimov AV; Xu XG
Med Phys; 2010 Dec; 37(12):6199-204. PubMed ID: 21302776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of on-board kV cone beam computed tomography-based dose calculation with deformable image registration using Hounsfield unit modifications.
Onozato Y; Kadoya N; Fujita Y; Arai K; Dobashi S; Takeda K; Kishi K; Umezawa R; Matsushita H; Jingu K
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Jun; 89(2):416-23. PubMed ID: 24685445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
