These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28246644)

  • 1. Intrinsic paleointensity bias and the long-term history of the geodynamo.
    Smirnov AV; Kulakov EV; Foucher MS; Bristol KE
    Sci Adv; 2017 Feb; 3(2):e1602306. PubMed ID: 28246644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High geomagnetic intensity during the mid-Cretaceous from Thellier analyses of single plagioclase crystals.
    Tarduno JA; Cottrell RD; Smirnov AV
    Science; 2001 Mar; 291(5509):1779-83. PubMed ID: 11230692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Weaker axially dipolar time-averaged paleomagnetic field based on multidomain-corrected paleointensities from Galapagos lavas.
    Wang H; Kent DV; Rochette P
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Dec; 112(49):15036-41. PubMed ID: 26598664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bulk magnetic domain stability controls paleointensity fidelity.
    Paterson GA; Muxworthy AR; Yamamoto Y; Pan Y
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Dec; 114(50):13120-13125. PubMed ID: 29187534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High geomagnetic field intensity recorded by anorthosite xenoliths requires a strongly powered late Mesoproterozoic geodynamo.
    Zhang Y; Swanson-Hysell NL; Avery MS; Fu RR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Jul; 119(29):e2202875119. PubMed ID: 35858328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Cretaceous superchron geodynamo: observations near the tangent cylinder.
    Tarduno JA; Cottrell RD; Smirnov AV
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2002 Oct; 99(22):14020-5. PubMed ID: 12388778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Paleomagnetism indicates that primary magnetite in zircon records a strong Hadean geodynamo.
    Tarduno JA; Cottrell RD; Bono RK; Oda H; Davis WJ; Fayek M; Erve OV'; Nimmo F; Huang W; Thern ER; Fearn S; Mitra G; Smirnov AV; Blackman EG
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Feb; 117(5):2309-2318. PubMed ID: 31964848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. PALEOMAGNETISM. A Hadean to Paleoarchean geodynamo recorded by single zircon crystals.
    Tarduno JA; Cottrell RD; Davis WJ; Nimmo F; Bono RK
    Science; 2015 Jul; 349(6247):521-4. PubMed ID: 26228145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Archaeomagnetism in the Levant and Mesopotamia Reveals the Largest Changes in the Geomagnetic Field.
    Shaar R; Gallet Y; Vaknin Y; Gonen L; Martin MAS; Adams MJ; Finkelstein I
    J Geophys Res Solid Earth; 2022 Dec; 127(12):e2022JB024962. PubMed ID: 37033112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Geomagnetic dipole strength and reversal rate over the past two million years.
    Valet JP; Meynadier L; Guyodo Y
    Nature; 2005 Jun; 435(7043):802-5. PubMed ID: 15944701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Instability of thermoremanence and the problem of estimating the ancient geomagnetic field strength from non-single-domain recorders.
    Shaar R; Tauxe L
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Sep; 112(36):11187-92. PubMed ID: 26305946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Geomagnetic reversal rates following Palaeozoic superchrons have a fast restart mechanism.
    Hounslow MW
    Nat Commun; 2016 Aug; 7():12507. PubMed ID: 27572303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intensity of the Earth's magnetic field: Evidence for a Mid-Paleozoic dipole low.
    Hawkins LMA; Grappone JM; Sprain CJ; Saengduean P; Sage EJ; Thomas-Cunningham S; Kugabalan B; Biggin AJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Aug; 118(34):. PubMed ID: 34404726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Latest pleistocene and holocene geomagnetic paleointensity on hawaii.
    Mankinen EA; Champion DE
    Science; 1993 Oct; 262(5132):412-6. PubMed ID: 17789950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Geodynamo, solar wind, and magnetopause 3.4 to 3.45 billion years ago.
    Tarduno JA; Cottrell RD; Watkeys MK; Hofmann A; Doubrovine PV; Mamajek EE; Liu D; Sibeck DG; Neukirch LP; Usui Y
    Science; 2010 Mar; 327(5970):1238-40. PubMed ID: 20203044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Paleomagnetism and the nature of the geodynamo.
    Merrill RT; McFadden PL
    Science; 1990 Apr; 248(4953):345-50. PubMed ID: 17784488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Early Cambrian renewal of the geodynamo and the origin of inner core structure.
    Zhou T; Tarduno JA; Nimmo F; Cottrell RD; Bono RK; Ibanez-Mejia M; Huang W; Hamilton M; Kodama K; Smirnov AV; Crummins B; Padgett F
    Nat Commun; 2022 Jul; 13(1):4161. PubMed ID: 35853855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Deciphering records of geomagnetic reversals.
    Valet JP; Fournier A
    Rev Geophys; 2016 Jun; 54(2):410-446. PubMed ID: 31423490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Magnetic reversals from planetary dynamo waves.
    Sheyko A; Finlay CC; Jackson A
    Nature; 2016 Nov; 539(7630):551-554. PubMed ID: 27820946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dependence of the duration of geomagnetic polarity reversals on site latitude.
    Clement BM
    Nature; 2004 Apr; 428(6983):637-40. PubMed ID: 15071591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.