153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28247931)
1. Dimensions of the South Oaks Gambling Screen in Finland: A cross-sectional population study.
Salonen AH; Rosenström T; Edgren R; Volberg R; Alho H; Castrén S
Scand J Psychol; 2017 Jun; 58(3):228-237. PubMed ID: 28247931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The suitability of the South Oaks Gambling Screen-Revised for Adolescents (SOGS-RA) as a screening tool: IRT-based evidence.
Chiesi F; Donati MA; Galli S; Primi C
Psychol Addict Behav; 2013 Mar; 27(1):287-93. PubMed ID: 23025708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using a Rasch model to examine the utility of the South Oaks Gambling Screen across clinical and community samples.
Strong DR; Lesieur HR; Breen RB; Stinchfield R; Lejuez CW
Addict Behav; 2004 May; 29(3):465-81. PubMed ID: 15050667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Problem and probable pathological gambling among older adults assessed by the SOGS-R.
Wiebe JM; Cox BJ
J Gambl Stud; 2005; 21(2):205-21. PubMed ID: 15870987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability, validity and classification accuracy of the South Oaks Gambling Screen in a Brazilian sample.
de Oliveira MP; da Silveira DX; de Carvalho SV; Collakis ST; Bizeto J; Silva MT
J Gambl Stud; 2009 Dec; 25(4):557-68. PubMed ID: 19774450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Presence of problematic and disordered gambling in older age and validation of the South Oaks Gambling Scale.
Granero R; Jiménez-Murcia S; Fernández-Aranda F; Del Pino-Gutiérrez A; Mena-Moreno T; Mestre-Bach G; Gómez-Peña M; Moragas L; Aymamí N; Giroux I; Grall-Bronnec M; Sauvaget A; Codina E; Vintró-Alcaraz C; Lozano-Madrid M; Camozzi M; Agüera Z; Sánchez-González J; Casalé-Salayet G; Sánchez I; López-González H; Valenciano-Mendoza E; Mora B; Baenas I; Menchón JM
PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0233222. PubMed ID: 32428026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Gambling Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS): development, confirmatory factor validation and psychometric properties.
Raylu N; Oei TP
Addiction; 2004 Jun; 99(6):757-69. PubMed ID: 15139874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Problematic and pathologic gambling in Hungary: the Hungarian version and use of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS-HU)].
Gyollai A; Urbán R; Kun B; Paksi B; Arnold P; Balázs H; Kökönyei G; Oláh A; Demetrovics Z
Psychiatr Hung; 2011; 26(4):230-40. PubMed ID: 22058255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The South Oaks Gambling Screen-revised Adolescent (SOGS-RA) revisited: a cut-point analysis.
Boudreau B; Poulin C
J Gambl Stud; 2007 Sep; 23(3):299-308. PubMed ID: 17180721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Reliability and validity of the modified Japanese version of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS)].
Kido M; Shimazaki T
Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2007 Feb; 77(6):547-52. PubMed ID: 17447464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability of Instruments Measuring At-Risk and Problem Gambling Among Young Individuals: A Systematic Review Covering Years 2009-2015.
Edgren R; Castrén S; Mäkelä M; Pörtfors P; Alho H; Salonen AH
J Adolesc Health; 2016 Jun; 58(6):600-15. PubMed ID: 27151759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The Hungarian version of the Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI-HU)].
Gyollai A; Urbán R; Farkas J; Kun B; Kökönyei G; Eisinger A; Magi A; Demetrovics Z
Psychiatr Hung; 2013; 28(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 24142293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability, validity, and cut scores of the south oaks gambling screen (SOGS) for Chinese.
Tang CS; Wu AM; Tang JY; Yan EC
J Gambl Stud; 2010 Mar; 26(1):145-58. PubMed ID: 19680794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating the problem gambling severity index.
Holtgraves T
J Gambl Stud; 2009 Mar; 25(1):105-20. PubMed ID: 18704661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Co-occurrence of addictive behaviours: personality factors related to substance use, gambling and computer gaming.
Walther B; Morgenstern M; Hanewinkel R
Eur Addict Res; 2012; 18(4):167-74. PubMed ID: 22398819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS).
Stinchfield R
Addict Behav; 2002; 27(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 11800216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using the Rasch model to evaluate the South Oaks Gambling Screen for use with nonpathological gamblers.
Strong DR; Breen RB; Lesieur HR; Lejuez CW
Addict Behav; 2003 Oct; 28(8):1465-72. PubMed ID: 14512069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An Item Response Theory-Based Scoring of the South Oaks Gambling Screen-Revised Adolescents.
Anselmi P; Colledani D; Andreotti A; Robusto E; Fabbris L; Vian P; Genetti B; Mortali C; Minutillo A; Mastrobattista L; Pacifici R
Assessment; 2022 Oct; 29(7):1381-1391. PubMed ID: 34036842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The NODS-CLiP: a rapid screen for adult pathological and problem gambling.
Toce-Gerstein M; Gerstein DR; Volberg RA
J Gambl Stud; 2009 Dec; 25(4):541-55. PubMed ID: 19603259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. GamTest: Psychometric Evaluation and the Role of Emotions in an Online Self-Test for Gambling Behavior.
Jonsson J; Munck I; Volberg R; Carlbring P
J Gambl Stud; 2017 Jun; 33(2):505-523. PubMed ID: 28265831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
