BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

639 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28248407)

  • 1. Hemodynamic changes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation during sequential follow-ups in patients with bicuspid aortic valve compared with tricuspid aortic valve.
    Xiong TY; Zheng MX; Wei X; Li YJ; Liao YB; Zhao ZG; Xu YN; Tang H; Feng Y; Chen M
    Cardiol J; 2017; 24(4):350-357. PubMed ID: 28248407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Less pronounced reverse left ventricular remodeling in patients with bicuspid aortic stenosis treated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement compared to tricuspid aortic stenosis.
    Xiong TY; Wang X; Li YJ; Liao YB; Zhao ZG; Wei X; Xu YN; Zheng MX; Zhou X; Peng Y; Wei JF; Feng Y; Chen M
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Nov; 34(11):1761-1767. PubMed ID: 29915878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hemodynamic classification of paravalvular leakage after transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared with angiographic or echocardiographic classification for prediction of 1-year mortality.
    Schoechlin S; Brennemann T; Allali A; Ruile P; Jander N; Allgeier M; Gick M; Richardt G; Neumann FJ; Abdel-Wahab M
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 May; 91(6):E56-E63. PubMed ID: 29105984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of multislice computed tomography findings between bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
    Watanabe Y; Chevalier B; Hayashida K; Leong T; Bouvier E; Arai T; Farge A; Hovasse T; Garot P; Cormier B; Morice MC; Lefèvre T
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Aug; 86(2):323-30. PubMed ID: 25594190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computed tomography characteristics of the aortic valve and the geometry of SAPIEN 3 transcatheter heart valve in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease.
    Kawamori H; Yoon SH; Chakravarty T; Maeno Y; Kashif M; Israr S; Abramowitz Y; Mangat G; Miyasaka M; Rami T; Kazuno Y; Takahashi N; Jilaihawi H; Nakamura M; Cheng W; Friedman J; Berman D; Sharma R; Makkar RR
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Dec; 19(12):1408-1418. PubMed ID: 29315371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bicuspid Aortic Valve Anatomy and Relationship With Devices: The BAVARD Multicenter Registry.
    Tchetche D; de Biase C; van Gils L; Parma R; Ochala A; Lefevre T; Hovasse T; De Backer O; Sondergaard L; Bleiziffer S; Lange R; Kornowski R; Landes U; Norgaard BL; Biasco L; Philippart R; Molina-Martin de Nicolas J; Mylotte D; Lemee C; Dumonteil N; Van Mieghem NM
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Jan; 12(1):e007107. PubMed ID: 30626202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The feasibility of transcatheter aortic valve implantation using the Edwards SAPIEN 3 for patients with severe bicuspid aortic stenosis.
    Arai T; Lefèvre T; Hovasse T; Morice MC; Romano M; Benamer H; Garot P; Hayashida K; Bouvier E; Chevalier B
    J Cardiol; 2017 Sep; 70(3):220-224. PubMed ID: 28209261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Corroborative Autopsy Findings for Current Concerns After Implantation of Self-Expandable Transcatheter Heart Valve.
    Ninomiya K; Yahagi K; Asami M; Tanaka T; Tomii D; Tanaka J; Komiyama K; Yokozuka M; Miura S; Aoki J; Tanabe K
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jan; 13(2):261-262. PubMed ID: 31883722
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Insight on patient specific computer modeling of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease.
    Brouwer J; Gheorghe L; Nijenhuis VJ; Ten Berg JM; Rensing BJWM; van der Heyden JAS; Swaans MJ
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 May; 93(6):1097-1105. PubMed ID: 30461187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Structural Valve Deterioration after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Using J-Valve: A Long-Term Follow-Up.
    Li F; Wang X; Wang Y; Xu F; Wang X; Li X; Wang W
    Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2020 Jun; 26(3):158-165. PubMed ID: 32249256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative study of bicuspid vs. tricuspid aortic valve stenosis.
    Huntley GD; Thaden JJ; Alsidawi S; Michelena HI; Maleszewski JJ; Edwards WD; Scott CG; Pislaru SV; Pellikka PA; Greason KL; Ammash NM; Malouf JF; Enriquez-Sarano M; Nkomo VT
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Jan; 19(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 29029001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 3D-printing assisted closure of paravalvular leak.
    Motwani M; Burley O; Luckie M; Cunnington C; Pisaniello AD; Hasan R; Malik I; Fraser DG
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2020; 14(5):e66-e68. PubMed ID: 30930181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Impact of bicuspid aortic valve or tricuspid aortic valve on hemodynamics and left ventricular reverse remodeling in patients after transcatheter aortic valve replacement].
    Zhang JQ; Chi CW; Zhao WL; Meng QT; Wang LD; Liu JY; Sun FZ; Zhang SL; Liu JH
    Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2022 Dec; 50(12):1193-1200. PubMed ID: 36517440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in bicuspid aortic valve stenosis.
    Perlman GY; Blanke P; Webb JG
    EuroIntervention; 2016 Sep; 12(Y):Y42-5. PubMed ID: 27640030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. VitaFlow™ transcatheter valve system in the treatment of severe aortic stenosis: One-year results of a multicenter study.
    Zhou D; Pan W; Wang J; Wu Y; Chen M; Modine T; Mylotte D; Piazza N; Ge J
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Feb; 95(2):332-338. PubMed ID: 31020788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differences in metabolic profiles between bicuspid and tricuspid aortic stenosis in the setting of transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
    Xiong TY; Liu C; Liao YB; Zheng W; Li YJ; Li X; Ou Y; Wang ZJ; Wang X; Li CM; Zhao ZG; Feng Y; Liu XJ; Chen M
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2020 May; 20(1):229. PubMed ID: 32423380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mid-term outcomes and hemodynamic performance of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in bicuspid aortic valve stenosis: Insights from the bicuSpid TAvi duraBILITY (STABILITY) registry.
    Fiorina C; Massussi M; Ancona M; Montorfano M; Petronio AS; Tarantini G; Castriota F; Chizzola G; Costa G; Tamburino C; Adamo M
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Nov; 102(6):1132-1139. PubMed ID: 37668083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-Term Recovery of Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction after Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Bicuspid Aortic Valve Disease.
    Disha K; Espinoza A; Rouman M; Secknus MA; Kuntze T; Girdauskas E
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Aug; 64(5):418-26. PubMed ID: 26251215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-year clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with bicuspid aortic disease: Comparison between self-expanding and balloon-expandable valves.
    Boiago M; Bellamoli M; De Biase C; Beneduce A; Alonso LG; Laforgia P; Feliachi S; Oliva OA; Dumonteil N; Tchétché D
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2024 May; 103(6):1004-1014. PubMed ID: 38577939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bioprosthetic Valve Performance After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Self-Expanding Versus Balloon-Expandable Valves in Large Versus Small Aortic Valve Annuli: Insights From the CHOICE Trial and the CHOICE-Extend Registry.
    Abdelghani M; Mankerious N; Allali A; Landt M; Kaur J; Sulimov DS; Merten C; Sachse S; Mehilli J; Neumann FJ; Frerker C; Kurz T; El-Mawardy M; Richardt G; Abdel-Wahab M
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Dec; 11(24):2507-2518. PubMed ID: 30503595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.